- Hi, About 5 years ago I decided to create a crossover module, and realized that to maintain a 2 percent grade or less, I needed about 6 feet length for theMessage 1 of 38 , Apr 4, 2013View SourceHi,
About 5 years ago I decided to create a crossover module, and realized that to maintain a 2 percent grade or less, I needed about 6 feet length for the module. One set of tracks had to be cut lower into the foam and the other set raised to clear the lower ones. There are photos in the CrossoverModule photo folder on this website, and complete details in two Ztrack articles from 2008. After I built it, I realized that I had the same cross wiring issue, and solved it by creating an end module that was wired differently to accommodate the crossover wiring. Trains run fine with this combination. This obviously won't help if you're trying to do all this in a briefcase layout. So, it can be done, but you just need a lot more space.
- Thanks Mark. I saw the layout in the file section of the Yahoo Group. I could not get the link you provided in your responce to work though. EddieMessage 38 of 38 , Apr 11, 2013View SourceThanks Mark. I saw the layout in the file section of the Yahoo Group. I could not get the link you provided in your responce to work though.
From: mark2playz <mark.markham@...>
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2013 2:44 PM
Subject: [Z_Scale] Re: Track crossing question
I've re-posted you image with notes for VERY basic electrical wiring:
There's a lot of ways of doing this, including adding the Marklin track swicthes to make the operation automatic to auto-sensing reversing circuits.
For a quick interesting layout I've always liked a figure-eight folded over at the crossing (either over/under or the 13-degree track).
--- In mailto:z_scale%40yahoogroups.com, Eddie Hen <southridge90@...> wrote:
> Ok, like I said, let the laughter begin! What looked good on paper, did not
> cross over to the real world. When I hooked up one of the inter loops,
> minus the intersection part, the train would not run. Guess I was creating a
> major short. Oh well, back to my original boring layout, unless of course someone
> can stop laughing enought toÂ come up with a solution.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]