Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: MTL sleeper designation

Expand Messages
  • mark2playz
    Lindley, Glad I could help. I wouldn t worry too much about the F7. In researching one of my projects: the City of San Francisco I found that about the only
    Message 1 of 4 , Oct 26 8:46 PM
      Lindley,
      Glad I could help.
      I wouldn't worry too much about the F7. In researching one of my projects: the "City of San Francisco" I found that about the only time the COSF F3 loco was used was for publicity photos. Otherwise SP's motive power was GPs F7s, whatever they could find.
      Mark

      --- In z_scale@yahoogroups.com, "Lindley Ruddick" <elruddick@...> wrote:
      >
      > Thanks Mark.
      > I am doing a pseudo Golden State (GS) using the MTL sleepers and an MTL F7! I am well aware that a GS F7 never existed but as the old saying goes - it's my railroad. I would like to name the cars with appropriate names as an old MicroScale N scale decal instruction sheet gives names for various sleeper configurations. According to that sheet, the GS 6-6-4 sleepers were Golden Valley, Sea, Plain, Cloud, Creek and Canyon. That should be more than enough to make a nice looking train even if it is not prototypical.
      > Lindley
      >
      > --- In z_scale@yahoogroups.com, "mark2playz" <mark.markham@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Lindley,
      > > I would call it a 6-6-4 at first glance, from the window configuration. However some RRs would remodel the interiors and might have called it something else.
      > > Mark
      > >
      > > --- In z_scale@yahoogroups.com, "Lindley Ruddick" <elruddick@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > > Can someone tell me the designation of the Z scale MTL sleeper cars?
      > > > Things like 12, 10-6, 4-4-2, 6-6-4, etc.
      > > >
      > >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.