71161Re: [Z_Scale] Why 1:220 ?
- Sep 1, 2012*Try Rob Kluz. Since Marklin started it I'd suspect it has something to do
with so many EVEN millimeters to scale size. Just a guess.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, mark2playz <mark.markham@...>wrote:
> Recently I was asked a question about Z scale I couldn't answer: why is it
> 1:220 scale? Why not 1:200 or 1:250? I really didn't have an answer and was
> wondering if anyone here has a good story to go with "why 1:220?"
*...don a * * **- Northern Ohio, USA*
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>