70517Re: [Z_Scale] Re: THE BIG NEWS AT DENVER...
- May 9, 2012HI David,
I worked in Nn3 for a while and all in all, it's pretty close to actual "scale parameters" modeling...
(turnouts hand-built with code 40 or code 30 rail, etc) but even then, there are always fudge
factors to up with put. Hand building track and turnouts is very time consuming but it's fun
once you've collimated all the adjustments that make the layout operational.
I agree: To do similar "fine-scale" modeling in Z scale would require the resources
of a Swiss watchmaker and a layout built and operating in an Intel "clean room".
Even now, accumulations of dust and dander adversely affect my "off-the-shelf"
Z scale operations. And I can't imagine building code 20 track and turnouts!
Your new design for a Z scale coupler looks very promising and I wish you the
greatest success in manufacturing this elegant solution to our coupling & de-coupling woes.
Viva the innovator!
On May 8, 2012, at 10:27 PM, david.davidksmith wrote:
> There's nothing to prevent scaling down wheels and rails precisely to 1:220 (long ago I did it for N scale). For it to function, however, the trackwork must be nothing less than absolutely perfect, and the cars weighted well above standard practice. Sprung trucks and drivers are also a necessity. By this time, costs would be astronomical--over a hundred dollars per wheelset; a few hundred for one truck; perhaps a thousand for one car, and the track--I cannot even imagine it. In the end, though, for someone with bottomless pockets, completely accurate wheels and track are indeed feasible. Practical, however, they are not.
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, Kevin Brady <kbvrod@...> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > There was a Z-scale modeler in England,I recall years ago who did
> > exactly that.
> > Dr D
> > the point where things like wheel flanges cannot be in scale because
> > > it would never run reliably.
> > >
> > >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- << Previous post in topic