Re: [xml-dbms] C++ alternative
- KRUMPOLEC Martin wrote:
> I seems I will have to "port" xmldbms to C++ :-)If you do this, you may want to wait until 2.0 is available. It fixes a
lot of problems from 1.0 and adds a number of new features.
> btw, iCONNECTOR from infoteria looks useable too ...I though it used a table-based mapping. However, I could be wrong.
> It seems I'll take a look at ADO first and maybe considerAssuming the C++ version of ADO is comparable to the VB version, it's
> minimalistic xml dbms port if time allows ...
pretty nice. The features are somewhat different from XML-DBMS, but the
overall functionality is similar.
Of course, a C++ port of XML-DBMS would be nice...
> Assuming the C++ version of ADO is comparable to the VB version,I think ADO covers only small subset of XML-DBMS because
> it's pretty nice. The features are somewhat different from
> XML-DBMS, but the overall functionality is similar.
it can obly persist recordset to/from XML with fixed schema
so I'll have to transform (XSLT) in/out documents ...
Plus I have to supply query statements when DB -> XML
because I can't supply own model to infer them from ...
Btw, ADO.NET looks much much better, but .NET framework
is still not final (only first RC right now) ...
So it seems I have to stick with XML-DBMS 1 subset
(ported to C++) for now ...
Martin Krumpolec <krumpo@...>