Who's the real Hindu?
Does the VHP have the right to speak for you or I? Do they reflect our
views? Do we endorse their behaviour? They call themselves the Vishwa
Hindu Parishad, but who says they represent all of us? This Sunday
morning, I want to draw a clear line of distinction between them and
everyone else. My hunch is many of you will agree.
Let me start with the question of conversion an issue that greatly
exercises the VHP. I imagine there are hundreds of millions of Hindus
who are peaceful, tolerant, devoted to their faith, but above all, happy
to live alongside Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains and Jews.
If any one of us were to change our faith how does it affect the next
man or woman? And even if that happens with inducements, it can only
prove that the forsaken faith had a tenuous and shallow hold. So why do
the VHP and its unruly storm troopers, the Bajrang Dal, froth at the
mouth if you, I or our neighbours convert? What is it to do with them?
Let me put it bluntly, even crudely. If I want to sell my soul and
trade in my present gods for a new lot why shouldn't I? Even if
the act diminishes me in your eyes, it's my right to do so. So if
thousands or even millions of Dalits, who have been despised and
ostracised for generations, choose to become Christian, Buddhist or
Muslim, either to escape the discrimination of their Hindu faith or
because some other has lured them with food and cash, it's their right.
Arguably you may believe you should ask them to reconsider, although I
would call that interference, but you certainly have no duty or right to
stop them. In fact, I doubt if you are morally correct in even seeking
to place obstacles in their way. The so-called Freedom of Religion Acts,
which aim to do just that, are, in fact, tantamount to obstruction of
conversion laws and therefore, at the very least, questionable.
However, what's even worse is how the VHP responds to this matter.
Periodically they resort to violence including outright murder. What
happened to Graham Staines in Orissa was not unique. Last week it
happened again. Apart from the utter and contemptible criminality of
such behaviour, is this how we Hindus wish to behave? Is this how we
want our faith defended? Is this how we want to be seen? I have no doubt
the answer is no. An unequivocal, unchanging and ever-lasting NO!
The only problem is it can't be heard. And it needs to be. I therefore
believe the time has come for the silent majority of Hindus both
those who ardently practice their faith as well as those who were born
into it but may not be overtly religious or devout to speak out.
We cannot accept the desecration of churches, the burning to death of
innocent caretakers of orphanages, the storming of Christian and Muslim
hamlets even if these acts are allegedly done in defence of our faith.
Indeed, they do not defend but shame Hinduism. That's my central point.
I'm sorry but when I read that the VHP has ransacked and killed I'm not
just embarrassed, I feel ashamed. Never of being hindu but of what some
Hindus do in our shared faith's name.
This is why its incumbent on Naveen Patnaik, Orissa's Chief Minister, to
take tough, unremitting action against the VHP and its junior wing, the
Bajrang Dal. This is a test not just of his governance, but of his
character. And I know and accept this could affect his political
survival. But when it's a struggle between your commitment to your
principles and your political convenience is there room for choice? For
ordinary politicians, possibly, but for the Naveen I know, very
So let me end by saying: I'm waiting, Naveen. In fact, I want to say I'm
not alone. There are hundreds of millions of Hindus, like you and me,
waiting silently but increasingly impatiently. Please act for all
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
To leave this list, send an email to:
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]