Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Disclosure of documents would harm US/UK relations

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Releasing details about a prisoner held in Guantánamo Bay would damage UK relations with America, court told Disclosure of prisoner details would harm
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 4, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Releasing details about a prisoner held in Guantánamo Bay would
      damage UK relations with America, court told

      Disclosure of prisoner details would harm national security, says US
      Duncan Campbell

      Binyam Mohamed, a UK resident held in Guantánamo Bay. Photograph: PA

      The US state department today warned that disclosure of secret
      information in the case of a British resident said to have been
      tortured before he was sent to Guantánamo Bay would cause "serious
      and lasting damage" to security relations between the two countries.

      In a last-minute court intervention, a legal adviser to the US state
      department also claimed that the "national security of the UK" would
      be affected by disclosure of the details of the detention and
      interrogation of Binyam Mohamed, who is being held in Guantánamo Bay
      accused of conspiring with al-Qaida.

      Lawyers for the 30-year-old Ethiopian national, backed by the
      organisation Reprieve, took legal action to demand access to details
      of the whereabouts and manner of his interrogation from the time he
      was detained in 2002 until he was taken to Guantánamo Bay in 2004.
      Mohamed claims that his torture included having his penis cut with a
      razor blade.

      In an email to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, which was sent
      on to the court, Stephen Mathias, a legal adviser to the US state
      department, said that the disclosure of information would
      cause "serious and lasting damage to the US-UK intelligence-sharing
      relationship and thus the national security of the UK, and the
      aggressive and unprecedented intervention in the apparently
      functioning adjudicatory processes of a longtime ally of the UK, in
      contravention of well-established principles of international

      Counsel for Mohamed, Ben Jaffey, read out the email to Lord Justice
      Thomas and Mr Justice Lloyd Jones. He told the court that the US
      authorities had informed them that 44 documents would be made
      available to the "convening authoritity" in the US which will decide
      on Mohamed's prosecution but not to his legal representatives, Lt-
      Col Yvonne Bradley, an Air Force reservist from Pennsylvania, and
      Clive Stafford-Smith of Reprieve, although both had been security-
      cleared in the US.

      Jaffey told a packed court that there was "no movement on the
      central question - where was Mr Mohamed between 2002 and 2004." He
      said that the offer to make the 44 documents available to convening
      authority was "consirably lacking in substance".

      Tim Eicke, for the government, said that the US authorities had made
      concessions by offering to make the documents available to the
      convening authority. He added that it was clear that, in doing so,
      they had acted "in good faith".

      After hearing from both sides in open court, the judges retired to
      chambers to hear further arguments in private. No decision was made
      last night but a ruling is expected on Friday.

      Mohamed, a UK resident, was initially held in Pakistan in 2002 and
      was later secretly rendered to Morocco, where he claimed that he was
      tortured and had his penis lacerated while further threats were
      made. He was then flown by the US authorities to Afghanistan, where
      he claims he was subjected to further ill-treatment and
      interrogation, at the end of which he said that he would have said
      anything to avoid further punishment.

      In September 2004, he was taken to Guantánamo Bay, where he is still
      held. He claims that all his confessions were a result of the
      torture. He faces the death penalty if convicted.

      Last week, in the initial hearing of the case, the high court found
      that MI5 had participated in the unlawful interrogation of Mohamed
      <http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/22/uksecurity.guantanamo>. It
      emerged that one MI5 officer was so concerned about incriminating
      himself that he initially declined to answer questions from the
      judges even in private. Although the judges said that "no adverse
      conclusions" should be drawn by the plea against self-incrimination,
      it was disclosed that the officer, Witness B, was questioned about
      alleged war crimes, including torture, under the international
      criminal court act.

      David Miliband, the foreign secretary, has provided the US with
      documents about the case. Miliband has declined to release further
      evidence about the case on grounds of national security, arguing
      that disclosure would harm Britain's intelligence relationship with
      the US.

      NOTE: This article is backstory for yesterday's article,
      "British Gitmo Detainee Wins Documents" http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/message/9517



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To leave this list, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.