Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Is the Pentagon Funding Likudist Fronts?

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Is the Pentagon Policy Shop Funding Likudist Fronts? Jim Lobe 3/19/2008 Inter Press Service http://www.ips.org/blog/jimlobe/?p=118 Remember the curious and
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 25, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      Is the Pentagon Policy Shop Funding Likudist Fronts?
      Jim Lobe
      Inter Press Service

      Remember the curious and intriguing interconnections between One
      Jerusalem, a Likud/settler group chaired by Natan Sharansky, and two
      U.S-led "NGOs" with overlapping or interchangeable directorates — the
      "Policy Forum on International Security Affairs (PF)" and the newly
      minted "Case for Freedom" — that we discovered in the participants
      list of the "Prague Democracy and Security" conference where George W.
      Bush appeared despite the concerns of his State Department last June?
      I wrote about the conference twice, once describing it as a
      "Neo-Conservative International" and a second time focusing on those
      very same connections under the title, "More on that Meeting in Prague."

      Well, there are some new developments that raise fresh questions about
      these groups, their provenance, and interrelationships. At the time of
      the conference, the websites of both the Policy Forum (PF) and the
      Case for Freedom (CCF) were "under construction," but now they're up
      (click on their names and you'll see them), although the PF site seems
      somewhat comatose. The second piece of news is that the Pentagon's
      policy office — formerly run by Doug Feith (a co-founder with
      Sharansky of One Jerusalem) and currently directed by one of the
      remaining neo-cons at the Pentagon, Undersecretary of Defense for
      Policy Eric Edelman — awarded a $79,416 no-bid contract to the Policy
      Forum and its director, Devon Gaffney Cross (yes, that's Frank
      Gaffney's sister) last September.

      As I pointed out last June, Cross, who remains a member of the the
      Pentagon's Defense Policy Board (DPB), a voluntary group that is
      supposed to give policy advice (presumably untainted by any conflicts
      of interest) to the secretary of defense, has been arranging
      exclusive, off-the-record get-togethers between senior Pentagon
      officials and prominent neo-conservatives and fellow-travelers at even
      more exclusive venues in London and Paris. Among her guests have been
      Edelman himself; former Assistant Secretary of Defense Peter Rodman;
      ret. Gen. (and Surge architect) Jack Keane; neo-con heavyweights James
      Woolsey and Michael Barone; and even sometime-neo-con/sometime-realist
      Henry Kissinger. (Like Cross, Keane and Kissinger also serve on the
      DPB.) But, because their sessions are off the record, we don't know
      who else has been featured at these tetes-a-tete. Here are the group's
      purpose and performance as laid out on the PF website:

      "Our aim is to create an open channel of dialogue between those
      who create the international news and those who report it, in an
      effort to articulate more clearly and accurately the animating forces
      behind American foreign policy.

      The response to our efforts, among the media, has been both prompt
      and enthusiastic â€" [sic] editors of The Financial Times, The Daily
      Telegraph, The London Times, The Economist, The Sun and The Spectator
      have all participated in our discussions."

      Leading columnists and members of editorial boards have at various
      times been included, and visiting participants have written to us
      emphasizing how important our gatherings have been in elevating the
      level of discourse in the British press about American politics and

      Until now, I had the impression that these little chats were privately
      funded; as a former senior of several far-right foundations, a former
      president of the Donor's Forum on International Affairs, and the
      spouse of New York Jets president Jay Cross, Devon Cross is clearly a
      woman of means who would presumably not have to resort to the public
      treasury to spread the word to elite journalists about Washington's
      good intentions in the Middle East. But here are the relevant excerpts
      of the July 23, 2007 "presolicitation notice" put out by the
      Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) Acquisition and Procurement
      Office of the Pentagon:

      "The Washington Headquarters Services (WHS) on behalf of the Under
      Secretary of Defense for Policy plans to award a sole source contract
      to Policy Forum on International Security Affairs (PFISA), a small
      business, under FAR PART 13.5 in conjunction with FAR Part 12. The
      purposed contract action is for services which the Government intends
      to solicit with only one source in accordance with FAR Part 6.302-1.
      This procurement is for technical support and consulting services for
      public liaison and media outreach services in support of the diplomacy
      mission including addressing and informing European and Middle Eastern
      audiences on the challenges facing U.S. National Security policies.
      The awardee will engage London based European and Arab media in candid
      discussions on a wide variety of national security issues of interest
      to senior Department of Defense (DoD) officials. No solicitation will
      be issued. This notice is not a request for competitive quotations.
      Performance period is for a 12-month base period and (4) 12-month
      option periods. Award is imminent."

      The award actually was made two months later, according to WHS
      officials, who told me that the total contract was for some $79,000
      and made out for Devon Cross herself.

      Now, admittedly, this is not an enormous amount of taxpayer money at
      stake, but I'm intrigued by a number of questions raised by this
      transaction. These include:

      1) Is there a conflict of interest between her membership in the
      DPB and her receiving a contract from the office on whose behalf the
      DPB volunteers its time?

      2) Do other members of the DPB also receive "honoraria" for their
      appearances arranged by Cross?

      3) Are the members of the press invited to these events informed
      of the Pentagon's financial sponsorship?

      4) Is the Pentagon financing the appearances of "unofficial"
      guests, such as Woolsey and Barone (whose views may not reflect those
      of the administration at any given moment)?

      5) Why is this being contracted out to a private group when the
      Pentagon presumably can use its own public- and media-affairs
      personnel to arrange dinners and coffees in London and Paris? (They
      can certainly run a more up-to-date website!)

      6) And, recalling the fact that Cross also serves as an adviser to
      the Lincoln Group — the Pentagon contractor that paid Iraqi newspapers
      to print pro-U.S. propaganda — is this little program part of a larger
      information operation in the Rumsfeldian sense of the phrase? (Bear in
      mind that Amir Taheri, one of Cross's closest collaborators and a
      frequent invitee at these affairs, has a long history of disseminating
      disinformation about the Iranian regime, the most recent being the
      widely circulated story about Tehran requiring religious minorities,
      including Jews, to wear different colored ribbons on their outer
      garments (a la Third Reich) to distinguish them from Muslims.)

      Finally, if, indeed, as it asserts, the website is supposed to promote
      discussion of U.S. foreign policy to the general public in Europe, as
      well as to opinion-shapers in the elite media, why is it so lacking in
      transparency? There's not a word about the organization's directors or
      officers or its financial sources or governance or just about anything
      else of an institutional nature.

      It's not that we don't know about other individuals involved in PF's
      work, although we have to rely on other sources, like the Prague
      Conference's Participants List, to identify them.

      Thus, we learned from the list that an Allen Roth also represented the
      Policy Forum at the Prague Conference. As we noted last June, Roth, a
      New York-based attorney was also serving as president of Sharansky's
      One Jerusalem at that time (although onejerusalem's website has since
      been changed in a way that makes it very difficult, if not impossible,
      to determine its current directors or staff. The same goes for the new
      PF and CFF websites.) Roth's association with PF was confirmed by
      another source: a Nexis search found a business profile by the
      London-based ICC Information Group of the "Policy Forum on
      International Security Issues". In a December 13 2007 entry, it named
      Devon Gaffney Cross as the group's "Foundation Director" and Allen
      Roth as its "Public Policy Analyst."

      Another Prague attendee who was identified on the Participants List as
      PF's "director" was Steven Schneier. As I pointed out last June,
      Schneier was identified by a 1999 Jewish Week investigative article
      entitled "Likud's Tangled Charity Web" as a key U.S. fund-raiser for
      and top adviser to former Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu. His job
      was apparently to funnel campaign contributions from Likud's
      supporters in the U.S. — among them, "Casino King" Irving Moskowitz, a
      major backer of the most radical Jewish settler groups in East
      Jerusalem and the West Bank and, not coincidentally perhaps, also a
      big contributor to Frank Gaffney's Center for Security Policy (CSP)
      and to the American Enterprise Institute (where he funded David
      Wurmser's work in the late 1990s) — through various Likud-controlled
      charities. Schneier also helped handle the "charitable contributions"
      of Manfred Lehmann, identified by the Week as "the late philanthropist
      who defended Dr. Baruch Goldstein's murder of 29 Palestinians in
      Hebron in 1994." So a quick glance at the Prague participants list
      might have suggested to Sec. Edelman or his staff that some heavy-duty
      settler/Likudniks were associated in some way with the organization to
      which his office was about to give a no-bid renewable contract.

      There is one other individual who has been publicly identified with
      the Policy Forum, a rather mysterious German national named Zacharias
      Gertler who, according to another ICC profile served as a "managing
      director" of "The Policy Forum on International Security Issues" from
      December 18, 2003 — that is, soon after Cross set up shop in London —
      until he resigned on March 1, 2007. Gertler, who clearly shuns
      publicity, appears to be the same "Zac Gertler" described by the May 1
      2007 edition of London's Evening Standard as one of "London's Secret
      Rich." With some 200 million pounds sterling in real estate, according
      to the Standard, "Zacharias Gertler is a leading member of a
      German-Jewish family with large property holdings. the Gertlers have
      major property investments in the former East Germany. In London,
      their portfolio includes chunks of King's Cross and the City as well
      as a number of buildings in Baker Street. They also own hotels in
      Israel. Gertler lives quietly in St. John's Wood. He has only three
      publicly-listed UK directorships, one of which is the German-British

      So back to the Prague Conference where, curiously, Cross herself was
      not, as you would expect, identified as executive director of the
      Policy Forum, but rather as a representative of "Case for Freedom," a
      new organization that appears to have been launched at the conference.
      Strangely, however, a search for "devon" on CFF's new site yields
      nothing, although "The Policy Forum for International Affairs" — along
      with a number of other interesting sites — appears on its "recommended
      links" list. And, while the CFF site describes the organization as "a
      dynamic community for dissidents and freedom's advocates across the
      globe," there doesn't appear to be any information about who runs it.
      Moreover, the community which is supposed to be mobilized by CFF
      appears to be virtually non-existent. According to its "forums"
      section, there are only five registered users. Like onejerusalem, the
      CFF's home page is lively and seemingly up to date, but the actual
      content beyond the home page, besides the "latest news" section, is

      One of the strangest things about the site is the "Interview with Gary
      Kasparov" which is featured in the center of the home page. The
      interviewer is Jeffrey Gedmin, who introduces himself correctly as the
      president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), but then
      adds that he is conducting the interview "for the caseforfreedom.org"
      — a rather bizarre introduction for the head of a U.S. government
      agency — unless, of course, the caseforfreedom is an RFE/RL project.
      If you search the rferl website, however, nothing comes up either for
      "Case for Freedom" or "caseforfreedom.org." The CFF home page also
      features an audio interview with Kambiz Tavana, acting deputy director
      of Radio Farda, the RFERL entity that broadcasts to Iran, which
      appears to be a major preoccupation of the site, as it was at the
      Prague Conference itself.

      Gedmin, who headed AEI's New Atlantic Initiative and subsequently
      headed the Aspen Institute in Berlin, was appointed to his current
      position in early 2007. A dyed-in-the-wool neo-con, he was also a
      charter signatory (along with Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Libby,
      etc.) of the Project for the New American Century in 1997 and of a
      letter (co-signed by Richard Perle, Frank Gaffney, Doug Feith, and
      David Wurmser, among others) from "the Committee for Peace and
      Security in the Gulf" that advocated overthrowing Saddam Hussein the
      following year. He signed the September 20 2001 PNAC letter, which
      called for Saddam to be ousted as part of the "war on terror," and the
      subsequent April 2002 PNAC letter (along with all the hard-line
      neo-cons, including the Likudniks at AEI, Gaffney, and John McCain's
      foreign policy spokesman, Randy Scheunemann) that concluded, "Israel's
      fight against terrorism is our fight."

      I also have it on excellent authority that Gedmin has a longstanding
      and close working relationship with Gaffney Cross. After all, not only
      have they been running in the same hard-line neo-con circles for
      years, but, with Cross in London and Gedmin in Berlin and now Prague
      (RFE/RL's European headquarters), their mission to alter Europe's
      negative attitudes toward Bush administration policies in the Middle
      East has been very similar. One wonders whether RFE/RL, in addition to
      Edelman's shop, is also providing support in some way to Cross'
      efforts in her PF or CFF capacity — a question that will have to go
      begging for now because no press officer at RFE/RL is returning my calls.

      Now, what was particularly intriguing about the interrelationships
      between PF and CFF and One Jerusalem back in June was the fact that,
      until May, Cross' PF email account, press@..., was
      hosted by the "onejerusalem.org" mail server in Israel, as shown by
      the screen capture we reproduced in the June 16 post. Shortly after
      the screen capture was taken, however, Cross appears to have changed
      her organization's email server to gmail.

      What we've now found, however, is that onejerusalem.org,
      policyforumuk.com, and caseforfreedom.org are not only all hosted by
      the same Israel-based ISP, but they also share exactly the same IP
      address, (along with carolineglick.com, the personal
      blog by the pro-settler editor of the Jerusalem Post by the same
      name). Theoretically, this could be a total coincidence, but experts
      I've spoken to insist that all of these sites are almost certainly
      managed, hosted and owned by the same organization or individual
      which, we believe, must be onejerusalem. (It was the first to register
      the domain, back in 2000.) One Jerusalem was the the only one of the
      three sites that listed an actual phone number on its registration,
      and, when we called it, the receptionist answered, "Allen Roth's
      office," presumably the same Allen Roth who last year was listed as
      One Jerusalem's president nine months ago. This would add to the
      impression that we first gained last June: that the CFF and Cross' PF
      work very closely with and may well be fronts for One Jerusalem.

      Now, let us recall what One Jerusalem stands for and who its founders
      were, at least according to its website last June. It was founded
      during the Camp David negotiations in late 2000 to rally public
      opinion in Israel and in the United States, in particular, against any
      peace deal — indeed, any negotiation — that could conceivably result
      in ceding any part of Jerusalem, including Arab East Jerusalem, to the
      Palestinians. It is thus opposed to the official policies, at least in
      principle, of both the current Israeli and U.S. governments. Indeed,
      in the run-up to last November's Annapolis summit hosted by Bush
      himself, One Jerusalem ran a well-financed (thanks to Netanyahu buddy,
      Ronald Lauder), public campaign designed to discredit and undermine it
      in advance. One Jerusalem's founders included Sharansky, Netanyahu
      adviser Dore Gold, Feith (who even opposed the original Camp David
      Accords between Israel and Egypt), David Horowitz (of Islamofascism
      Awareness Week); and David Steinmann, the former chairman of the
      ultra-hawkish Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA),
      among other hardline Likudists.

      So, you may ask, why is the Pentagon policy office awarding a no-bid
      contract to an organization whose institutional relationships and
      affiliations appear so opposed to official U.S. policy and which is so
      utterly lacking in transparency? And how is that such clearly
      pro-Likud individuals as Cross and Gedmin (not to mention the new
      Undersecretary of State for Public Diplomacy, James Glassman who, like
      Gedmin, is an AEI alumnus) are put in charge of U.S. public-diplomacy
      efforts in Europe, let alone the Middle East? How does this happen?



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To leave this list, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.