Robert Fisk: Torture does not work
- The Americans are just apeing their predecessors in the Inquisition
Torture does not work, as history shows
Tue Feb 5, 2008
"Torture works," an American special forces major now, needless to
say, a colonel boasted to a colleague of mine a couple of years ago.
It seems that the CIA and its hired thugs in Afghanistan and Iraq
still believe this. There is no evidence that rendition and beatings
and waterboarding and the insertion of metal pipes into men's anuses
and, of course, the occasional torturing to death of detainees has
ended. Why else would the CIA admit in January that it had destroyed
videotapes of prisoners being almost drowned the "waterboarding"
technique before they could be seen by US investigators?
Yet only a few days ago, I came across a medieval print in which a
prisoner has been strapped to a wooden chair, a leather hosepipe
pushed down his throat and a primitive pump fitted at the top of the
hose where an ill-clad torturer is hard at work squirting water down
the hose. The prisoner's eyes bulge with terror as he feels himself
drowning, all the while watched by Spanish inquisitors who betray not
the slightest feelings of sympathy with the prisoner. Who said
"waterboarding" was new? The Americans are just apeing their
predecessors in the inquisition.
Anther medieval print I found in a Canadian newspaper in November
shows a prisoner under interrogation in what I suspect is medieval
Germany. In this case, he has been strapped backwards to the outer
edge of a wheel. Two hooded men are administering his agony. One is
using a bellows to encourage a fire burning at the bottom of the wheel
while the other is turning the wheel forwards so that the prisoner's
feet are moving into the flames. The eyes of this poor man naked
save for a cloth over his lower torso are tight shut in pain. Two
priests stand beside him, one cowled, the other wearing a robe over
his surplice, a paper and pen in hand to take down the prisoner's words.
Anthony Grafton, who has been working on a book about magic in
Renaissance Europe, says that in the 16th and 17th centuries, torture
was systematically used against anyone suspected of witchcraft, his or
her statements taken down by sworn notaries the equivalent, I
suppose, of the CIA's interrogation officers and witnessed by
officials who made no pretence that this was anything other than
torture; no talk of "enhanced interrogation" from the lads who turned
the wheel to the fire.
As Grafton recounts, "The pioneering medievalist Henry Charles Lea ...
wrote at length about the ways in which inquisitors had used torture
to make prisoners confess heretical views and actions. An enlightened
man writing in what he saw as an enlightened age, he looked back in
horror at these barbarous practices and condemned them with a clarity
that anyone reading public statements must now envy."
There were professionals in the Middle Ages who were trained to use
pain as a method of enquiry as well as an ultimate punishment before
death. Men who were to be "hanged, drawn and quartered" in medieval
London, for example, would be shown the "instruments" before their
final suffering began with the withdrawal of their intestines in front
of vast crowds of onlookers. Most of those tortured for information in
medieval times were anyway executed after they had provided the
necessary information to their interrogators. These inquisitions
with details of the torture that accompanied them were published and
disseminated widely so that the public should understand the threat
that the prisoners had represented and the power of those who
inflicted such pain upon them. No destroying of videotapes here.
Illustrated pamphlets and songs, according to Grafton, were added to
the repertory of publicity.
Ronnie Po-chia Hsia and Italian scholars Diego Quaglioni and Anna
Esposito have studied the 15th-century Trent inquisition whose victims
were usually Jews. In 1475, three Jewish households were accused of
murdering a Christian boy called Simon to carry out the supposed
Passover "ritual" of using his blood to make "matzo" bread. This
"blood libel" it was, of course, a total falsity is still, alas,
believed in many parts of the Middle East although it is frightening
to discover that the idea was well established in 15th century Europe.
As usual, the podestà a city official was the interrogator, who
regarded external evidence as providing mere clues of guilt. Europe
was then still governed by Roman law which required confessions in
order to convict. As Grafton describes horrifyingly, once the
prisoner's answers no longer satisfied the podestà, the torturer tied
the man's or woman's arms behind their back and the prisoner would
then be lifted by a pulley, agonisingly, towards the ceiling. "Then,
on orders of the podestà, the torturer would make the accused 'jump'
or 'dance' pulling him or her up, then releasing the rope,
dislocating limbs and inflicting stunning pain."
When a member of one of the Trent Jewish families, Samuel, asked the
podestà where he had heard that Jews needed Christian blood, the
interrogator replied and all this while, it should be remembered,
Samuel was dangling in the air on the pulley that he had heard it
from other Jews. Samuel said that he was being tortured unjustly. "The
truth, the truth!" the podestà shouted, and Samuel was made to "jump"
up to eight feet, telling his interrogator: "God the Helper and truth
help me." After 40 minutes, he was returned to prison.
Once broken, the Jewish prisoners, of course, confessed. After another
torture session, Samuel named a fellow Jew. Further sessions of
torture finally broke him and he invented the Jewish ritual murder
plot and named others guilty of this non-existent crime. Two tortured
women managed to exonerate children but eventually, in Grafton's
words, "they implicated loved ones, friends and members of other
Jewish communities". Thus did torture force innocent civilians to
confess to fantastical crimes. Oxford historian Lyndal Roper found
that the tortured eventually accepted the view that they were guilty.
Grafton's conclusion is unanswerable. Torture does not obtain truth.
It will make most ordinary people say anything the torturer wants.
Why, who knows if the men under the CIA's "waterboarding" did not
confess that they could fly to meet the devil. And who knows if the
CIA did not end up believing him.
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.
To leave this list, send an email to: