Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

"Hell no, we won't go!' say U.S. diplomats

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Hell no, we won t go! say U.S. diplomats MATTHEW LEE Associated Press October 31, 2007
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 1, 2007
      "Hell no, we won't go!' say U.S. diplomats
      Associated Press
      October 31, 2007

      WASHINGTON — The usually staid corridors of the U.S. State Department
      erupted Wednesday with the sounds of a diplomatic revolt over a
      management decision to force foreign service officers to take jobs in
      Iraq under threat of dismissal.

      With some likening it to a "potential death sentence," several hundred
      U.S. diplomats vented anger and frustration at the largest diplomatic
      call-up since Vietnam. In a contentious hour-long "town hall meeting,"
      diplomats faced off with officials behind the order that will require
      some to serve at the embassy in Baghdad and outlying provinces.

      Many expressed serious concern about the ethics of sending diplomats
      against their will to work in a war zone — where the embassy staff is
      largely confined to the protected "Green Zone" — as the department
      reviews use of private security guards to protect its staff.

      "Incoming is coming in every day, rockets are hitting the Green Zone,"
      said Jack Croddy, a senior foreign service officer who once worked as
      a political adviser with NATO forces.

      He and others directly confronted Foreign Service Director General
      Harry Thomas, who approved the move to "directed assignments" late
      last Friday to make up for a lack of volunteers willing to go to Iraq.

      "It's one thing if someone believes in what's going on over there and
      volunteers, but it's another thing to send someone over there on a
      forced assignment," Mr. Croddy said. "I'm sorry, but basically that's
      a potential death sentence and you know it. Who will raise our
      children if we are dead or seriously wounded?"

      His remarks were met with loud and sustained applause from the
      approximately 300 diplomats at the meeting.

      Mr. Thomas responded by saying the comments were "filled with
      inaccuracies" but did not elaborate until challenged by the head of
      the diplomats' union, the American Foreign Service Association (AFSA),
      who, like Mr. Croddy and others, demanded to know why many learned of
      the decision from news reports.

      Mr. Thomas took full responsibility for the late notification but
      objected when AFSA President John Naland said a recent survey found
      only 12 per cent of the union's membership believed Secretary of State
      Condoleezza Rice was "fighting for them."

      "That's their right but they're wrong," Mr. Thomas said, prompting a
      testy exchange.

      "Sometimes, if it's 88 to 12, maybe the 88 per cent are correct," Mr.
      Naland said.

      "88 per cent of the country believed in slavery at one time, was that
      correct?" shot back Mr. Thomas, who is black, in a remark that drew
      boos from the crowd. "Don't you or anybody else stand there and tell
      me I don't care about my colleagues. I am insulted," Mr. Thomas added.

      Ms. Rice was not present for the meeting, but her top adviser on Iraq,
      David Satterfield, did attend.

      State Department spokesman Sean McCormack acknowledged the session had
      been "pretty emotional" but praised Mr. Thomas for holding it. He also
      stressed that all diplomats sign an oath to serve the country that
      obligates them to be available to work anywhere in the world.

      "It's a pretty sensitive topic and understandably, some people are
      going to have some pretty strong feelings about it," Mr. McCormack
      told reporters after the meeting. "Ultimately, our mission in Iraq is
      national policy, it is the foreign policy set out by the secretary as
      well as the president of the United States.

      He added that the results of the AFSA poll about Ms. Rice were "very
      unfortunate" because "she is deeply concerned with, by and involved in
      the management decisions regarding the foreign service (and) working
      as hard as she possibly can to get the resources for the State

      Other diplomats at the meeting did not object to the idea of directed
      assignments but questioned why the State Department had been slow to
      respond to the medical needs of those who had served in dangerous posts.

      "I would just urge you, now that now we are looking at compulsory
      service in a war zone, that we have a moral imperative as an agency to
      take care of people who ... come back with war wounds," said Rachel
      Schnelling, a diplomat who served in Basra, Iraq and said the
      department had been unresponsive to requests for mental heath care.

      "I asked for treatment and I didn't get any of it," she said in
      comments greeted with a standing ovation.

      Mr. Thomas, who has been in his current job for just a few months,
      said the department was working on improving its response to
      stress-related disorders that "we did not anticipate."

      Under the new order, 200 to 300 diplomats have been identified as
      "prime candidates" to fill 48 vacancies that will open next year at
      the Baghdad embassy and in the provinces. Those notified have 10 days
      to accept or reject the position. If not enough say yes, some will be
      ordered to go.

      Only those with compelling reasons, such as a medical condition or
      extreme personal hardship, will be exempt from disciplinary action.
      Diplomats forced into service in Iraq will receive the same extra
      hardship pay, vacation time and choice of future assignments as those
      who have volunteered.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To leave this list, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.