Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Biblical Archaeology vs Arthurian Archaeology

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Biblical Archaeology versus Arthurian Archaeology Joachim Martillo, Boston - ThorsProvoni @ aol.com Mon 10/01/07 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eaazi/ Biblical
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 1, 2007
      Biblical Archaeology versus Arthurian Archaeology
      Joachim Martillo, Boston - ThorsProvoni @ aol.com
      Mon 10/01/07

      Biblical Archaeology is as much a serious scientific and academic
      field as Arthurian archaeology based on the legends of King Arthur
      would be.

      Eric H. Cline, who is chair of the department of classical and Semitic
      languages and literature at the George Washington University, writes
      the following in "Raiders of the faux ark" (Boston Globe, September
      30, 2007, http://tinyurl.com/2h67q7):

      During the past century or so, archeologists have found the first
      mention of Israel outside the Bible, in an Egyptian inscription carved
      by the Pharaoh Merneptah in the year 1207 BC. They have found mentions
      of Israelite kings, including Omri, Ahab, and Jehu, in neo-Assyrian
      inscriptions from the early first millennium BC. And they have found,
      most recently, a mention of the House of David in an inscription from
      northern Israel dating to the ninth century BC. These are conclusive
      pieces of evidence that these people and places once existed and that
      at least parts of the Bible are historically accurate.

      The use of old names in a compendium of legendary material proves
      neither the historicity of Biblical Israel nor of Arthur's Camelot.

      Cline later asks the following question.

      If so, who was there first and to whom does the land [of Canaan]
      really belong today? Does it matter? It does to many Palestinians, who
      exert a (dubious) claim as descendants of the Canaanites and
      Jebusites, and to many Israelis, who exert a similar claim based on
      their own understanding of their ancestors' history.

      The absence of the "dubious" qualifier with regard to Israeli claims
      is striking. Non-biblical archeology, diachronic linguistics,
      historical texts, and onomastics are completely clear on the issue.
      Modern Palestinians are descendants of the ancient Greco-Roman
      Palestinian populations that included Judeans, Galileans, Idumeans,
      Nabateans, Philistines et. al. just as modern Syrians and Egyptians
      are descendants of ancient Syrians and Egyptians.

      Likewise, the archeological, linguistic, historical textual and
      onomastic evidence is crystal clear on the origin of the modern
      Eastern European Ashkenazi Jewish population. It descends from
      Eastern European and Southern Russian populations that started to
      practice various forms of Judaism in late antiquity and the early
      Middle Ages. Israeli archaeologists that want to learn about their own
      origins should dig in Europe.

      Cline's article focuses on trivialities. The misuse of "academic"
      Biblical Archaeology by European settler colonists and their American
      supporters to justify the theft of Palestine from the native
      population has far less connection to genuine scholarship and has
      resulted in far more evil than the mildly ridiculous claims of "pop"
      Biblical Archaeologists, whom Cline criticizes.


      Surge in students studying Arabic outstrips supply of teachers

      By Tali Yahalom, USA TODAY


      A shortage of Arabic-language teachers across the country is shedding
      light on a classic economics question: What happens when there is
      plenty of demand and not enough supply?

      Since 9/11, the number of students interested in the Middle Eastern
      language has been skyrocketing. More than 20,000 people in the USA
      enrolled in an Arabic-language higher-education program in 2006,
      double the number who signed up from 1998 to 2002, according to
      projections from a study the Modern Language Association expects to
      release this fall.

      "Other languages will show an increase (in the fall report), but the
      only language that might be as dramatic as Arabic might be Chinese,"
      says association executive director Rosemary Feal.

      Interest has also trickled down to the pre-collegiate level as
      secondary schools and summer language camps surface across the

      But generating student interest and enrollment is not the problem.

      "There's definitely more demand for courses than there are qualified
      instructors," Feal says. "There's no doubt."

      Education experts agree that Arabic is a difficult language to learn,
      more so than French or Spanish, the traditional alternatives.

      Not surprisingly, the student dropout rate is high.

      "We estimate that 20,000 students are studying Arabic at the
      collegiate level, but not even 5% are likely to graduate with
      functional speaking proficiency," says R. Kirk Belnap, director of
      the National Resource Center at Brigham Young University in Provo,

      In an attempt to fix the problem, programs are sprouting to provide
      Arabic lessons to younger students.

      More than 100 public, Islamic and other private schools nationwide
      now offer pre-collegiate Arabic-language programs of three to five
      sessions a week throughout the academic year, according to the
      National Capital Language Resource Center.

      Doing so does not come without risks, however. New York City this
      week opened its Khalil Gibran International Academy, which requires
      that its students study Arabic language. But the school has been
      greeted with protests by some who consider it a training ground for
      radical Islam. Others defend the school and say it helps meet the
      need for more Arabic speakers in the USA.

      This summer, STARTALK, a BYU-sponsored summer camp, offered a full
      session in Arabic for the first time in its 46-year history. This
      move represents further measures by the National Security Language
      Initiative — President Bush's 2006 effort to allot $114 million
      toward the study of Arabic, Farsi, Hindi and Urdu — to increase the
      learning of "critical" foreign languages. Minnesota's Concordia
      Language Villages recently completed its second annual Arabic
      language camp.

      Whether creative and younger classrooms are the solutions is yet to
      be determined. The dropout rate at the K-12 level is 75%, says Dora
      Johnson of the Center for Applied Linguistics, an organization based
      in Washington, D.C., that researches and promotes the teaching and
      learning of languages.

      But despite these numbers, academics say that there is potential for

      "I don't think they're frustrated," University of Texas Arabic
      professor Mahmoud al-Batal says of his "self-selected" Arabic
      students. "This is a national challenge for us. The most important
      thing is to provide teacher training for all those involved … and
      (create) more programs (overseas) and intensive programs in the U.S."

      Concordia's director, Christine Schulze, adds: "Arabic is a language
      in great demand in many areas of society. … People are more
      interested, curious and want to reach out."



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To leave this list, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.