Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

US Bombs Pakisan Again. Hello?

Expand Messages
  • World View
    US Military Bombards Targets Inside Pakistan By Peter Symonds 29 August, 2007 WSWS.org http://www.countercurrents.org/symonds290807.htm In an aggressive new
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 31, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      US Military Bombards Targets Inside Pakistan
      By Peter Symonds
      29 August, 2007

      In an aggressive new step, the US military shelled and destroyed
      targets across the Afghan border inside Pakistan on Sunday. While it
      has received scant coverage in the American and international media,
      the attack foreshadows more extensive US cross-border operations that
      have the potential to further destabilise Pakistani President Pervez
      Musharraf's uncertain grip on power.

      The US-led coalition in Afghanistan issued a statement declaring that
      Pakistan had given permission for an attack on Taliban positions
      inside its borders. Occupation forces in the eastern province of
      Paktika used artillery and mortar fire to destroy six positions—three
      inside Afghanistan, and three across the border in Pakistan. According
      to the statement, at least 12 insurgents were killed in the barrage.
      Pakistani officials emphatically denied giving approval for the
      assault. Military spokesman Major General Waheed Arshad declared,
      "There was no attack [from Pakistan], no firing from our side of the
      border. And there was no permission asked by them or given by us."
      Pakistani Foreign Office spokesperson Tasnim Aslam dismissed further
      US claims that Washington had an understanding with Islamabad to allow
      cross-border attacks as "speculative and fabricated".

      Late Monday, the US military belatedly conceded that no permission had
      been given. "We regret the miscommunications in this event," Brigadier
      General Joseph Votel, deputy commander of NATO's eastern region,
      declared. However, he made no apology for the attack itself and gave
      no guarantee that US forces would not engage in further cross-border

      The incident follows a series of statements by Bush administration
      officials indicating that the US military would take unilateral action
      inside Pakistan against Taliban and Al Qaeda targets. Late last month,
      Bush's Homeland Security Adviser Frances Townsend was asked on Fox
      News why the US was not sending predator drones and special forces
      into Pakistan. "Well, just because we don't speak about things
      publicly doesn't mean we're not doing many of the things you're
      talking about," she replied.

      During a press conference earlier this month, President Bush dodged a
      question about seeking Pakistani approval before sending in US troops.
      While noting the Pakistani president's past cooperation and shared
      concerns about "terrorism", Bush stressed: "I'm confident, with real
      actionable intelligence, we will get the job done." US and Afghan
      officials had been demanding for months that Musharraf take tougher
      action against anti-US insurgents based in Pakistan's tribal areas
      along the border with Afghanistan.

      There is no doubt that the US military has already taken action inside
      Pakistan. An Associated Press report published last week revealed
      that, as early as 2004, the rules of engagement for elite US special
      forces had authorised "hot pursuit" of anti-occupation fighters into
      Pakistan without seeking prior approval from Islamabad. The documents
      laid out circumstances in which US troops could penetrate up to 10
      kilometres into Pakistani territory. Pakistani villagers have
      protested on a number of occasions against US incursions and attacks,
      including aerial bombings.

      To date, the Bush administration has played down cross-border
      operations to minimise the political fall-out for Musharraf, who
      confronts widespread domestic opposition over his support for the US
      occupation of Afghanistan and the bogus "war on terror". For its part,
      the Pakistani regime has trod a fine line: publicly insisting that the
      US military observe its borders, while collaborating closely behind
      the scenes. The Associated Press article reported that the US military
      had established a liaison office in Islamabad that was responsible for
      notifying local authorities of US incursions into Pakistan.

      US demands for tougher Pakistani action against Islamist militants
      have made Musharraf's position even more precarious. Last month's
      bloody end to the siege of Islamabad's Red Mosque, or Lal Masjid, in
      which more than 100 people were killed, provoked widespread revulsion,
      denunciations of Musharraf as an American stooge and calls for his
      ousting. Attacks on Pakistani security forces by Islamic extremists
      have sharply escalated, with clashes taking place on a daily basis in
      tribal border areas. Major General Arshad told the media last Friday
      that around 250 militants and 60 troops had died over the previous
      month, including in suicide attacks on soldiers and police.

      Musharraf is also facing concerted pressure from the major opposition
      parties. Exiled former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who was ousted by
      Musharraf in a military coup in 1999, declared he would contest
      national elections after the country's Supreme Court ruled last week
      that there was no barrier to his return. Another exiled former prime
      minister, Benazir Bhutto, has engaged in talks with Musharraf to reach
      an arrangement that would enable her to return and take part in elections.

      Musharraf is confronting growing demands to step aside as the
      country's military commander if he seeks re-election as president. In
      the first sign of overt opposition in his own administration, one of
      Musharraf's cabinet ministers resigned on Monday and called for him to
      step down as head of the army. The dilemma for the increasingly
      beleaguered military strongman is that the army will only remain as a
      secure base of support if he stays at its head. The fighting in border
      areas has already opened up rifts in the army, which has had close
      ties to Islamist groups, includes significant numbers of Pashtuns, and
      previously backed the Taliban in Pashtun areas of Afghanistan.

      US cross-border attacks into Pakistan will only compound Musharraf's
      political problems. While the clash on Sunday has been minimised,
      Washington has not ruled out further attacks. Faced with a
      deteriorating military situation in Afghanistan and the contorted
      logic of his "war on terror", President Bush is under pressure to act
      against so-called Al Qaeda sanctuaries. Earlier his month, Democratic
      presidential contender Barack Obama publicly called for US troops to
      move against Al Qaeda forces inside Pakistan—with or without
      Islamabad's approval.

      Inside Afghanistan, US and coalition troops are confronting a rising
      tide of attacks by insurgents as well as widespread popular opposition
      to the five years of occupation, which has brought nothing but death
      and destruction to large parts of the country. Another five foreign
      troops died in fighting on Monday, taking the death toll for the year
      to more than 150. The 2007 figure is set to pass last year's toll of
      more than 190—the highest since the 2001 invasion.

      Last Sunday's attack on alleged Taliban positions inside Pakistan may
      indicate the start of more aggressive US interventions, regardless of
      the impact on the country's stability. One of the first casualties of
      such American action could well be Musharraf, who has been an
      important ally in legitimising and prosecuting the Bush
      administration's "war on terror".



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To leave this list, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.