Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.


Expand Messages
  • World View
    Coverage from the Financial Times to The Economist suggests that Aipac s power over the Middle East debate is fading THE ISRAEL LOBBY IS RAPIDLY LOSING SUPPORT
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 3, 2007
      Coverage from the Financial Times to The Economist suggests that
      Aipac's power over the Middle East debate is fading

      Alex Brummer
      Jewish Chronicle

      The power of the Israel lobby in the United States is indisputable.
      Two decades ago, I witnessed it personally when covering an election
      for the Senate in South Dakota, where the Jewish population is
      virtually nonexistent. In this remote corner of the country, a Senator
      of Arab-American descent found himself under assault in television
      commercials because of a vote he had cast against the supply of
      equipment for advanced F-16 fighter aircraft to Israel. James
      Abourezk, now an ex-senator, learned to his peril that you take on the
      American Israel Public Affairs Committee (Aipac), one of Washington's
      most effective lobby groups, at your peril.

      Yet there is growing evidence that the power of Aipac ­ which has just
      held its annual gathering in Washington DC ­ may not be as
      overwhelming as it once was.

      Criticism of Israel has become more fashionable. Jimmy Carter's book,
      Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid, has sold a remarkable 200,000 copies
      and recently won a surprisingly favourable review from Joseph
      Lelyveld, a former executive editor of the New York Times, in the New
      York Review of Books.

      An essay by American academics John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt
      claiming that the Israel lobby threatened America's security interests
      caused a furor last year when it was published in the London Review of

      Aipac may still have political pull and financial muscle, but its
      overwhelming domination of the debate about the future of the Middle
      East seems to be fading. Even the "Lexington" column in The Economist
      questioned Aipac's power.

      In the Financial Times, writer Graham Bowley chose Tony Judt, a
      leading British-born historian of Europe, for the weekly "Lunch with
      the FT" feature.

      Judt is increasingly lauded in the media as a dissident on the Middle
      East, whom the American Israel lobby failed to silence.

      As the FT writer reported, Judt has drawn the ire of Jewish groups in
      America for unexceptional suggestions that the Jewish lobby influences
      US policy towards Israel and shuts down debate. But the hostility
      almost certainly dates back to a piece in the New York Review of Books
      where Judt made the case for a "one state" solution to the
      Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

      In the interview, Judt recounts how he and his family received death
      threats and how he found himself ostracised by the American Jewish
      establishment for allegedly seeking the abolition of the Jewish state.

      But as a young man, the child of middleclass Jewish parents, he tells
      the FT, he volunteered to go to Israel in June 1967 to work as a
      translator and drive captured Syrian tanks.

      He adds that "Israel exists" and the "only question is what kind of
      state it will be in future years, what kind of laws is it going to
      have for first- and second-class citizens."

      For views like these, he argues, he has lost close friends, including
      Leon Wieseltier, the influential literary editor of the liberal
      political magazine The New Republic, for which Judt used to write.

      Certainly on a superficial level, the power of the pro-Israel lobby,
      as experienced by Judt, is as strong as ever. At the Aipac meeting,
      more than 6,000 enthusiastic delegates turned up to hear from the top
      people on Capitol Hill. The Economist notes that they could admire
      their work: Jewish numbers in Congress are at record levels, with 30
      in the House of Representatives (out of 435 members) and 13 out of 100
      members of the Senate. The magazine, which has a large readership in
      the US, notes there are now more Jews on Capitol Hill than
      Episcopalians, the American adherents to Anglicanism.

      So why does the magazine claim that Jewish power is not what it once
      was? The association of Aipac with support for the Iraq war, which is
      increasingly unpopular, had encouraged critics to publicly question
      America's alliance with Israel. Two retired members of Congress, Paul
      Findley and James Abourezk, have formed the Council for the National
      Interest, which bills itself as an anti-Aipac group.

      Then there is the growing number of Arab- Americans in the US. Turmoil
      in the Middle East, since the first intifada, provoked heavy
      emigration from the West Bank to the rustbelt states of Ohio and
      Michigan, where more than 3.5 million Arabs now reside.

      The Arab-Americans are creating their own pale versions of Aipac,
      including the Arab American Institute and the Council on
      American-Islamic Relations.

      So far, The Economist reports, they have been ineffectual, donating
      just $788,968 to favoured Congressional candidates against the
      astonishing $56.8 million raised by Aipac and other pro-Israel groups.

      But an even bigger threat looms from more liberal Jewish groups, who
      find their voice through publications like Tikkun. The more prominent
      of these include the Religious Action Centre for Reform Judaism,
      Americans for Peace Now and the Israel Policy Forum. They claim
      responsibility, for example, for watering down Aipac legislation which
      would have forbidden American contact with the current
      Hamas-sympathising Palestinian leadership.

      The majority of Americans may still be philo-Jewish. But the tide of
      media opinion, particularly among the intellectual chattering classes,
      could be turning.

      [NOTE: While AIPAC and the ADL are laying low lately due to public
      criticism of their anti-American and un-American activities, the
      Israeli pressure on American public officials and organizations
      remains strong through other Zionist organizations like the JCRC, AJC,
      and CJP, who participate in "Interfaith" activities to manipulate
      policy within Christian and Muslim organizations and institutions,
      thus by-passing democratic discussion with the general public. -WVNS]



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.