Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Sudan demands African Union peacekeeping force

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Despite U.S. threat of sanctions, Sudan demands African Union peacekeeping force By Saeed Shabazz May 15, 2007
    Message 1 of 1 , Jun 3, 2007
      Despite U.S. threat of sanctions,
      Sudan demands African Union peacekeeping force
      By Saeed Shabazz
      May 15, 2007

      Secretary General of the United Nations Ban Ki-moon, second from
      right, greets Oumar Konare, 2nd left, Chairman of the African Union
      and former President of Mali and AU's Salim Ahmed Salim, left, and
      U.N.'s Jan Eliasson at the beginning of an informal meeting regar ding
      Sudan at U.N. Headquarters in New York Monday, Apr. 16.
      Photo: AP/World Wide Photos

      UNITED NATIONS (FinalCall.com) - African Union chairman Alpha Oumar
      Konare and United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon recently met
      in New York for high-level discussions about problems in Sudan,
      particularly in the Darfur region.

      "We have had very intensive discussions on how to address the Darfur
      situation; and we are encouraged by the positive signs we have
      received from the Sudanese government," the secretary-general told
      reporters on Apr. 17.

      The day before, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir agreed to accept
      deployment of the United Nation's "heavy support package," which will
      supplement the 7,000-man African Union peacekeeping force in Darfur.
      Included in the heavy support package are 2,250 UN troops, 750
      international police, and logistical and aviation equipment including
      six helicopter gun ships.

      The Sudanese government has been accused of genocide in the Darfur
      region of the country as part of a civil war. Western nations, in
      particular, have been pushing the UN to take action. The deployment of
      an African peacekeeping force to protect civilians in Darfur has been
      seen as a compromise. The Sudanese government has denied that genocide
      has been committed.

      The AU called for the "consideration of sustainable funding for the
      African Union Mission in Sudan" following the two-day talks.
      Ambassador Said Djinnit, AU commissioner for peace and security, told
      reporters AMIS is costing the AU $25 million a month.

      "I share all the views that the secretary-general expressed and we
      will continue to strengthen this partnership between the African Union
      and the United Nations," Mr. Konare said. The meeting between the AU
      leader and UN secretary-general was held Apr. 16-17.

      The New York Times published a story Apr. 16 claiming that a
      "confidential report" leaked to the paper accused the Sudanese
      government of "painting" its own military planes to disguise them as
      United Nations or African Union aircraft.

      "The freshly painted planes are being operated out of all three of
      Darfur's principal airports and are being used for aerial surveillance
      and bombardments of villages," the Times said. The article also
      charged the Bashir administration with flying "ammunition and weapons
      into the western region" in violation of a 2005 arms embargo.

      The confidential report to the Panel of Experts, which is still being
      studied by the UN Sanctions Committee, was the reputed source for the
      Times story. The newspaper said the report was leaked by a member of
      the 15-member Security Council. The Associated Press said the report
      was given to their UN correspondent, and was originally leaked to the
      London-based Guardian on Mar. 28.

      "The Sudan was shocked and outraged to see the report fully leaked to
      The New York Times," Sudanese Ambassador Abdelmahmood Abdelhaleem
      said, in a prepared statement. As he walked through the corridors of
      the United Nations, Amb. Abdelhaleem called those responsible for the
      leak "enemies of peace and stability" in his nation.

      The ambassador denounced the charges as false, saying they had
      previously been discussed. "The publication of the report in the
      aforesaid newspaper and its timing, raises serious questions about the
      real intentions behind such leaks," he said.

      "Leaking of the report not only jeopardizes and compromises required
      professionalism, but also seriously hurt the image of the United
      Nations and its Security Council," added the Sudanese statement,
      released Apr. 18.

      President George W. Bush warned Apr. 18 that the U.S. was poised to
      "take unilateral steps against Sudan, including sanctions against 29
      government-controlled Sudanese companies and the blocking of any
      dollar-based transactions conducted by Khartoum." The president said
      Sudan had "one last chance" to accept a 20,000 strong UN peacekeeping
      force approved by the Security Council.

      A Wall Street Journal op-ed called for "destroying of Khartoum's air
      force on the ground" the "next time evidence emerges that Pres. Bashir
      is using it against Darfur."

      U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said, "It's a positive
      thing that this report is coming out because it is important
      information that will inform the debate about what diplomatic steps
      should be taken concerning Darfur."

      "This information is baseless," countered Sudanese Army spokesman
      Brigadier General Othman Mohammed al-Aghbach in an AFP article. "This
      type of accusation is unacceptable and can put an end to cooperation
      with the parties initiating them," he said.

      Secretary-General Ban called on Sudan to "clarify the accusations" in
      a press statement.

      Calls to the AU office in New York for comment were not returned at
      Final Call press time.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.