FBI interrogated anti-war activists
- FBI illegally interrogated anti-war activists
Washington Post article reveals flagrant civil liberties violations
The article below reports on information uncovered from a lawsuit
filed by the Partnership for Civil Justice (PCJ) in defense of
anti-war protesters who were arrested in Washington DC on April 20,
2002 and then illegally interrogated by an FBI Intelligence Unit. The
ANSWER Coalition had organized a mass demonstration of over 100,000
people that day in support of the Palestinian people.
Those arrested were simply participating in a mass assembly protest
and were detained and interrogated by the FBI when they went back to
the parking garage where their vehicles were parked. The demonstrators
were young and "dressed in black" which made them the target of this
now exposed FBI secret police tactic.
The Partnership for Civil Justice is a member group of the ANSWER
Coalition Steering Committee. PCJ attorneys have filed a number of
groundbreaking legal actions on behalf of wrongfully arrested
demonstrators, in support of the right to use Central Park for mass
assembly protests in New York City, the right of anti-war protestors
to demonstrate along the parade route at the Inauguration of George W.
Bush, and in a host of other major Free Speech battles. To get more
information and regular email updates about this and other legal
actions in defense of the Bill of Rights you can go to
<http://www.pephost.org/site/R?i=340Iysd9wBYhU0CqAI2Rvg..> and sign up
for email updates. Only the aggressive action of the people, in the
courts and in the streets, can serve as defense against the repressive
actions of the government.
Police Log Confirms FBI Role In Arrests
Group Detained, Questioned During D.C. War Protest*
By Carol D. Leonnig
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 3, 2007; B01
A secret FBI intelligence unit helped detain a group of war protesters
in a downtown Washington parking garage in April 2002 and interrogated
some of them on videotape about their political and religious beliefs,
newly uncovered documents and interviews show.
The revelations, combined with protester accounts, provide the first
public evidence that Washington-based FBI personnel used their
intelligence-gathering powers in the District to collect purely
For years, law enforcement authorities suggested it never happened.
The FBI and D.C. police said they had no records of such an incident.
And police told a federal court that no FBI agents were present when
officers arrested more than 20 protesters that afternoon for
trespassing; police viewed them as suspicious for milling around the
parking garage entrance.
But a civil lawsuit, filed by the protesters, recently unearthed D.C.
police logs that confirm the FBI's role in the incident. Lawyers for
the demonstrators said the logs, which police say they just found,
bolster their allegations of civil rights violations.
The probable cause to arrest the protesters as they retrieved food
from their parked van? They were wearing black -- a color choice the
FBI and police associated with anarchists, according to the police
FBI agents dressed in street clothes separated members to question
them one by one about protests they attended, whom they had spent time
with recently, what political views they espoused and the significance
of their tattoos and slogans, according to interviews and court records.
Ultimately, the protesters were not prosecuted because there wasn't
sufficient evidence of trespassing, and their arrest records were
Similar intelligence-gathering operations have been reported in New
York, where a local police intelligence unit tried to infiltrate
groups planning to protest at the Republican National Convention in
2004, and in Colorado, where records surfaced showing that the FBI
collected names and license plates of people protesting timber
industry practices at a 2002 industry convention.
Several federal courts have ruled that intelligence agencies can
monitor domestic groups only when there is reason to believe the group
is engaged in criminal activity. Experts in police conduct say it is
hard to imagine how asking questions about a person's political views
would be appropriate in a trespassing case.
The Washington case centers on activities that took place April 20,
2002 -- a day of three cacophonic but generally orderly rallies that
drew an estimated 75,000 people to the Mall. They included groups
demonstrating against the prospect of war in Iraq, numerous supporters
of the war, and Palestinians and others rallying for an end to U.S.
aid to Israel and for peace in the Middle East.
The police logs for that day show how events developed: Secret Service
agents had some concern about a group near the JBG Co. building's
garage at 1275 K St. NW just after 5 p.m.
"Intell 53 advises that five members of the anarchist group have
entered a parking garage," reads an entry from 5:12 p.m.
Ten minutes later, an entry notes the FBI's role.
"FBI, JOCC advises that an FBI intell team is responding to area of
13th and K/L Streets regarding a report of alleged anarchists in the
vicinity," it reads. "There are reportedly 15 anarchists at 13th and K
being interviewed. The subjects reportedly had a passkey to a
building, but it's unknown how they came to be in possession of it."
The entry notes that D.C. police also were at the site. The protesters
were detained at the garage for more than an hour, logs show, until
police decided to arrest them for alleged unlawful entry.
D.C. police officials acknowledged in 2003 that the department had a
secret intelligence unit that infiltrated and monitored protest groups
in the Washington area, even if authorities had no evidence of
criminal activity. The practice drew complaints from the D.C. Council,
and police promised to develop guidelines.
The Partnership for Civil Justice, a civil liberties group, helped 11
protesters sue D.C. police in 2003 and the FBI last year, alleging
that the questioning and detentions violated their civil rights.
In response to the suit, D.C. police at first said that no police
intelligence officials were involved in the arrests. Last year, city
officials revealed under additional questioning that five members of
the police intelligence unit were present.
The plaintiffs argue that the newly released police logs make clear
that the FBI, working hand in hand with local police, is engaged in a
concerted effort to spy on and intimidate U.S. citizens who are
lawfully exercising their free-speech rights. They contend that this
is a national effort that abuses the FBI's broad counterterrorism
powers and equates political speech with a risk to national security.
"It really is a secret police: This is an effort to suppress political
dissent," said Mara Verheyden-Hilliard of the Partnership for Civil
Justice. "If this was happening in another country that the U.S. was
targeting, U.S. officials at the highest levels would be decrying this
as a violation of human rights,"
FBI spokeswoman Debbie Weierman said the agency stands by its
assertion in court filings that it maintains no records of the incident.
A law enforcement official familiar with joint operations during
protests said it would be typical for the FBI to hand over records of
questioning to the lead agency -- in this case, the D.C. police.
D.C. police said authorities only recently found the logs of police
responses to that day's events. That discovery came after three years
of police assurances in federal court that no such records or logs
existed showing the FBI's role.
The records turned up on the eve of a deposition in which a police
records technician was to be questioned about the existence of a
routine log that his office is responsible for maintaining during any
mass protest in Washington.
Sgt. Joe Gentile, a D.C. police spokesman, referred questions to the
D.C. attorney general's office.
Traci Hughes, a spokeswoman for the attorney general's office, said
the city's lawyers never intentionally misrepresent evidence to the
court and come forward when discrepancies turn up.
"We have to rely upon information that the client gives us," Hughes
said, adding that police turned over the log as soon as they learned
In November, as the Partnership for Civil Justice continued to try to
get police records of the event, the FBI officials argued that the
lawsuit against the agency should be dismissed. They said that the
bureau had no relevant records and that if the FBI ever had any
records, they had been disposed of when protesters' arrest records
were expunged, or "they remain unidentifiable for other reasons."
Justice Department attorneys noted, however, that questioning people
in a criminal investigation was not improper.
In their lawsuit, the partnership and protesters said the FBI's
political and religious questioning was "wholly unrelated to any
legitimate activities of law enforcement" and violated their free
speech rights under the First Amendment. They noted that some of the
protesters had parked their van in the garage and were merely
Staff researcher Meg Smith contributed to this report.
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: