Can bad fences make good neighbours?:
- Can bad fences make good neighbours?:
Israel's separation wall is being used to annex territory
By Neve Gordon in Jerusalem
The Guardian - 29 May 2003
Although Mazmuriah is located less than 20 minutes' drive from my
Jerusalem apartment, all roads connecting the small village to the
city have been blocked off.
Using roundabout roads that wind across the hilly terrain of the
southern Jerusalem municipal border, we took more than an hour to
reach the village. The Palestinian residents invited us. They wanted
to tell Israeli peace activists about their imminent expulsion,
about their fear of being forced to move from their ancestral land.
They wanted to tell us about the bad fence. But first some
background. After the 1967 war, Israel annexed some 70sq km of land
to the municipal boundaries of West Jerusalem, imposing Israeli law
on this area. These annexed territories included not only the part
of Jerusalem that had been under Jordanian rule but also an
additional 64sq km, most of which had belonged to 28 villages in the
Unlike most of the inhabitants of the annexed villages, who were
subsequently registered by the Israeli civil administration as
Israeli residents (as opposed to citizens), the inhabitants of
Mazmuriah were given West Bank identity cards.
This created a juridical situation straight out of Kafka. The
Mazmuriah residents and their houses belong to different legal and
administrative systems: the houses and land are part of the
Jerusalem municipal system, while the inhabitants are residents of
the West Bank and therefore subjected to Israeli military rule.
Using its juridical control of the land, in 1992 Israel classified
the area in which the village is located as "green land" - land that
cannot be built on and is basically a nature reserve. The idea was
to strangle the local population, prohibiting them from constructing
any new houses.
Simultaneously the Jerusalem municipality also refused to provide
basic services to the village such as extending water and sewage
lines. Later, after the eruption of the second intifada, all roads
between the village and Jerusalem were closed off, thus forcing the
residents to become dependent on the West Bank for their livelihood
and their children's education.
What appeared to be a "legal anomaly" slowly became the grim reality
of everyday life. Although they live on land annexed by Israel, for
all practical purposes the Palestinian residents themselves do not
belong to Jerusalem; they are West Bankers. The only "defect" in
this grand plan is that they still reside in the annexed area. It is
this so-called defect that Israel now intends to fix.
Accompanied by border policemen, a coordinator for the Israeli
housing ministry, defence ministry, and Jerusalem municipality
recently showed the residents a map of where the separation fence
will pass. The fence, the residents learned, would surround the
village on its southern side and thus separate it from the West
Bank. Even if the residents are allowed to stay, their water
supplies will be cut off, they will not be able to reach work and
their children will be unable to go to school. To make things clear,
however, the Israeli official notified the Palestinian residents
that, because of the village's proximity to the planned separation
fence, they would have to move.
Israel's goal, it appears, is to expropriate the land "uninhabited".
It is highly unlikely, however, that the villagers will actually be
forced out of their homes. A more intricate strategy will be
Creating a physical barrier between the village and the West Bank
and not allowing the inhabitants any contact with either the
Palestinian Authority or the Jerusalem Municipality will undermine
their existence. Ultimately they will have to leave the village of
"their own accord".
This scheme of expelling a whole population from their land is in
blatant violation of basic rights as well as all the agreements that
Israel has signed, not least the principles laid out in the "road
map". In Israel we call this policy "transfer".
While the end of this story has yet to be told, the first 145km of
the separation fence will be completed in two months' time,
violating the rights of more than 210,000 Palestinians residing in
67 villages, towns and cities, according to the Israeli human rights
The crux of the matter is that the fence is not being erected on the
1967 borders, but is being used as a mechanism to expropriate
Palestinian land and create facts on the ground that will affect any
future arrangement between Israel and the Palestinians. Already in
this early stage, 13 communities - home to 11,700 people - have
become enclaves or bantustans imprisoned between the fence and
Israel. Thirty-six communities, in which 72,200 Palestinians reside,
will be separated from their farmlands that lie west of the fence.
Yehezkel Lein from B'tselem concludes: "In the past, Israel used
'imperative military needs' to establish settlements on expropriated
Palestinian land and argued that the action was temporary. The
settlements have for some time been facts on the ground and Israel
now demands that most of them be annexed to Israel. As in the case
of the settlements, it is reasonable to assume that the separation
fence will also be used to support Israel's future claim to annex
Good fences, the American poet Robert Frost once wrote, make good
neighbours. The question the Israeli government must ask itself is,
"What do bad fences make?"
Neve Gordon teaches politics and human rights at Ben-Gurion
NEWS AND VIEWS DISTRIBUTED HERE ARE THE AUTHOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OF WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Yahoo ads are not under WVNS control.