Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Politics must not interfere with 100-year war

Expand Messages
  • World View
    US general issues warning: politics must not interfere with 100-year war on terror By Bill Van Auken http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/dec2006/gene-d19.shtml
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 1, 2007
      US general issues warning: politics must not interfere with 100-year
      "war on terror"
      By Bill Van Auken
      http://www.wsws.org/articles/2006/dec2006/gene-d19.shtml


      One of the Pentagon's senior uniformed strategists warned last week
      that the "global war on terror" will go on for another 50 to 100 years
      and voiced concern that "politics" not be allowed to interfere with
      the protracted struggle.

      The remarks were made by Brig. Gen. Mark O. Schissler, an Air Force
      commander and the Defense Department's deputy director for the "war on
      terrorism." He made them in an exclusive interview with the Washington
      Times, the right-wing daily owned by the Unification Church of Rev.
      Sun Myung Moon.

      "We're in a generational war," he told the paper. "You can try and
      fight the enemy where they are and where they're attacking you, or
      prevent them and defend your own homeland," he said. "But that's not
      enough to stop it."

      The Washington Times went on to report, "Gen. Schissler said he is
      concerned that Washington politics is weakening the will of the nation."

      "I don't care about the politics," he told the newspaper. "I care
      about people understanding the facts of what our enemy is thinking
      about, what's our strategy to defeat them, and for [Americans] to
      understand that it will take a long fight, mostly because our enemy is
      committed to the long fight." He added, "They're absolutely committed
      to the 50-, 100-year plan."

      "One of my concerns is how to maintain the American will, the public
      will over that duration," the general said. He described this task as
      "very difficult."

      Difficult indeed. How is the "public will" to wage global warfare for
      the next century to be maintained, particularly when "politics" gets
      in the way?

      Given the political context of Schissler remarks, his warnings have
      unmistakable and chilling implications.

      Barely six weeks ago, the Bush administration, which initiated the
      "war on terror" and proclaimed Iraq to be its most important front,
      suffered a stunning defeat at the polls. The Republican Party's loss
      of both houses of the US Congress was the result of mass popular
      opposition to the Iraq war.

      This opposition has only deepened in the intervening weeks, as a
      series of opinion polls have demonstrated. A CBS News poll, for
      example, found that just 4 percent of Americans believe that terrorism
      is the most important problem confronting the country. The same poll
      found that a record 35 percent believe that the war in Iraq is the
      principal problem, with 71 percent saying the war is going badly and
      only 9 percent believing that the US is very likely to succeed in Iraq.

      A USA Today poll found that two-thirds believe that the costs of the
      US succeeding in Iraq outweigh the benefits. A clear majority wants
      all US troops withdrawn from the country within the next year, while
      74 percent say all combat troops should be withdrawn by March 2008.

      Not only is the American public unwilling to support a century of wars
      of aggression, it has reached the conclusion that the
      three-and-a-half-year-old war in Iraq should never have been launched
      and should be brought to a speedy end. This is the threat to the
      "American will" about which Gen. Schissler is so concerned.

      This supposed "will" to wage war—what could better be described as a
      temporary and forced acquiescence—was achieved through political
      deception and intimidation, by terrorizing the population with the
      supposed threat of attack in the wake of the September 11, 2001 tragedy.

      As all of the pretexts used to promote the war—weapons of mass
      destruction, Baghdad-Al Qaeda ties, etc.—were exposed as lies, and as
      the war itself turned into an ever-more bloody debacle, claiming the
      lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and either killing or
      wounding 25,000 US troops, the demand for withdrawal of US forces from
      Iraq was embraced by millions of Americans, including many in uniform.

      The issue posed is not really sustaining the "will" to wage a 100-year
      war, but suppressing the mass opposition to war that has already found
      powerful political expression.

      Among masses of American working people, there never was a will to
      wage wars of aggression. That outlook reflected the aims and schemes
      developed within the corporate and financial elite that rules America.
      This ruling layer has utilized the "global war on terror," in which
      Gen. Schissler is a senior strategist, as the pretext for carrying out
      a military campaign aimed at imposing US domination over the oil-rich
      regions of the Persian Gulf and Central Asia as part of American
      capitalism's pursuit of global hegemony.

      In the aftermath of the 2006 midterm elections, it has become
      increasingly apparent that this ruling elite has no intention of
      bowing to the actual will of the people, as reflected at the polls, by
      bringing an end to the war and withdrawing US troops from Iraq. It is
      driven by its own economic necessity to offset a declining position on
      the world market by means of military force. And it fears that a
      withdrawal from Iraq will expose the underlying weakness of American
      imperialism, raising the danger of revolutionary crises both at home
      and abroad.

      In his interview with the Washington Times, Schissler said that the
      century-long struggle he foresees will be waged against extremists
      determined to establish a global "caliphate" stretching from Spain to
      Indonesia. While there are, no doubt, a small number of radical
      Islamists who believe in such a crackpot scheme, this supposed threat
      has nothing to do with the military interventions now being carried
      out by Washington in the regions possessing the largest reserves of
      petroleum in the world.

      The attempt to cast the wars being waged in Afghanistan and Iraq in
      religious terms has become an increasingly common refrain within the
      most right-wing sections of the political establishment in Washington,
      as well as within the military command. There is no doubt that this
      depiction of events is aimed at solidifying a base of support for war
      among a layer of Christian fundamentalists.

      The most notorious example of this attempt to drum up a
      religious-based "will" to wage war came to light in 2003 with press
      reports of speeches delivered by Lt. Gen. William "Jerry" Boykin, the
      deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence, to audiences
      assembled by the Christian right.

      Boykin repeatedly told audiences that the war was being waged by a
      "Christian army" and a "Christian nation" against Islamic forces
      aligned with Satan. He proclaimed that his own confidence in victory
      over a Muslim foe was based on the knowledge that "my God was bigger
      than his . . . my God was a real god and his was an idol." He likewise
      declared that George W. Bush was "appointed by God," despite having
      failed to win the majority of the votes in 2000, and indicated that he
      saw himself as answerable only to God's commands.

      While the general's anti-Islamic bigotry and profoundly
      anti-democratic remarks provoked outrage, the Republican right and the
      Bush administration leapt to his defense. The general himself asked
      that a Pentagon inspector general investigate the controversy. The
      result was a report that avoided the content of Boykin's remarks,
      delivering only the mildest rebuke for his failure to assert that they
      were his personal opinion and to clear them first with superiors.

      General Boykin remains to this day the senior uniformed officer in
      military intelligence and a top policy-maker in the "war on terror,"
      overseeing assassination squads, illegal abductions and torture.

      Schissler is not known to have delivered any similar
      religious-political diatribes. His service record posted on the
      Defense Department's web site does, however, include the notation that
      in 1998, while climbing the promotional ladder to the Pentagon's inner
      circle, the Air Force officer found time to complete a master's degree
      in "pastoral studies."

      The politically protected ravings of Boykin as well as the expressions
      of concern by Schissler that "politics"—that is, the real will of the
      people—not be allowed to interfere with the official will to wage war
      are indicative of the right-wing and authoritarian tendencies that are
      being nurtured by American militarism and colonial-style occupation.

      In the end, imposing upon the American people the "will" to sustain a
      100-year war could be achieved only by dictatorial means similar to
      those utilized by the Nazis in their attempt to generate the "will" of
      the German people to sustain a 1,000-year Reich.

      The danger posed by such right-wing tendencies is not that they have
      any substantial base of popular support, but that they emerge under
      conditions of deepening social and political polarization in which the
      opposition of American working people to war and repression can find
      no genuine expression within the political establishment and its
      two-party system.

      *********************************************************************

      WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
      wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
      http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.