Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Norman Finkelstein Shames Human Rights Watch

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Human Rights Watch Must Retract Its Shameful Press Release By NORMAN G. FINKELSTEIN http://www.counterpunch.org/finkelstein11292006.html Even by the grim
    Message 1 of 1 , Dec 1, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Human Rights Watch Must Retract Its Shameful Press Release
      By NORMAN G. FINKELSTEIN
      http://www.counterpunch.org/finkelstein11292006.html


      Even by the grim standards of Gaza, the past five months have been
      cruel ones.

      Some four hundred Palestinians, mostly unarmed civilians, have been
      killed during Israeli attacks. (Four Israeli soldiers and two
      civilians have been killed.) Israel has sealed off Gaza from the
      outside world while the international community has imposed brutal
      sanctions, ravaging Gaza's already impoverished economy.

      "Gaza is dying," Patrick Cockburn reported in CounterPunch, "its
      people are on the edge of starvation.A whole society is being
      destroyed.The sound that Palestinians most dread is an unknown voice
      on their cell phone saying they have half an hour to leave their home
      before it is hit by bombs or missiles. There is no appeal. "

      "Gaza is in its worst condition ever," Gideon Levy wrote in Haaretz,
      "The Israeli army has been rampaging through Gaza--there's no other
      word to describe it--killing and demolishing, bombing and shelling
      indiscriminately....This is disgraceful and shocking collective
      punishment."

      Predictably Gaza teetered on the precipice of fratricidal civil war.
      "The experiment was a success: The Palestinians are killing each
      other," Amira Hass wryly observed in Ha'aretz , "They are behaving as
      expected at the end of the extended experiment called 'what happens
      when you imprison 1.3 million human beings in an enclosed space like
      battery hens.'"

      It is at times like this that we expect human rights organizations to
      speak out.

      How has Human Rights Watch responded to the challenge? It criticized
      Israel for destroying Gaza's only electrical plant, and also called on
      Israel to "investigate" why its forces were targeting Palestinian
      medical personnel in Gaza and to "investigate" the Beit Hanoun massacre.

      On the other hand, it accused Palestinians of committing a "war crime"
      after they captured an Israeli soldier and offered to exchange him for
      Palestinian women and children held in Israeli jails. (Israel was
      holding 10,000 Palestinians prisoner.) It demanded that Palestinians
      "bring an immediate end to the lawlessness and vigilante violence" in
      Gaza. (Compare Amira Hass's words.) It issued a 101-page report
      chastising the Palestinian Authority for failing to protect women and
      girls. It called on the Palestinian Authority to take "immediate steps
      to halt" Palestinian rocket attacks on Israel.

      Were this record not shameful enough, HRW crossed a new threshold at
      the end of November.

      After Palestinians spontaneously responded to that "unknown voice on a
      cell phone" by putting their own bare bodies in harm's way, HRW rushed
      to issue a press release warning that Palestinians might be committing
      a "war crime" and might be guilty of "human shielding." ("Civilians
      Must Not Be Used to Shield Homes Against Military Attacks")

      In what must surely be the most shocking statement ever issued by a
      human rights organization, HRW indicted Palestinian leaders for
      supporting this nonviolent civil disobedience:

      Prime Minister Haniyeh and other Palestinian leaders should be
      renouncing, not embracing, the tactic of encouraging civilians to
      place themselves at risk.

      The international community has for decades implored Palestinian
      leaders to forsake armed struggle in favor of nonviolent civil
      disobedience. Why is a human rights organization now attacking them
      for adopting this tactic?

      Is it a war crime to protect one's home from collective punishment?

      Is it human shielding if a desperate and forsaken populace chooses to
      put itself at deadly risk in order to preserve the last shred of its
      existence?

      Indeed, although Israeli soldiers have frequently used Palestinians as
      human shields in life-threatening situations, and although HRW has
      itself documented this egregious Israeli practice, HRW has never once
      called it a war crime.

      It took weeks before HRW finally issued a report condemning Israeli
      war crimes in Lebanon. Although many reliable journalists were daily
      documenting these crimes, HRW said it first had to conduct an
      independent investigation of its own.

      But HRW hastened to deplore the nonviolent protests in Gaza based on
      anonymous press reports which apparently got crucial facts wrong.

      Why this headlong rush to judgment?

      Was HRW seeking to appease pro-Israel critics after taking the heat
      for its report documenting Israeli war crimes in Lebanon?

      After Martin Luther King delivered his famous speech in 1967
      denouncing the war in Vietnam, mainstream Black leaders rebuked him
      for jeopardizing the financial support of liberal whites. "You might
      get yourself a foundation grant," King retorted, "but you won't get
      yourself into the Kingdom of Truth."

      HRW now also stands poised at a crossroads: foundation grants or the
      Kingdom of Truth?

      A first step in the right direction would be for it to issue a
      retraction of its press release and an apology.

      HRW executive director Kenneth Roth "commended" Israel during its last
      invasion for warning people in south Lebanon to flee--before turning
      it into a moonscape, slaughtering the old, infirm and poor left
      behind. It would seem that Palestinian leaders and people, too, merit
      some recognition for embracing the tactics of Gandhi and King in a
      last desperate bid to save themselves from annihilation.


      Email HRW Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson--whitsos @ hrw.org -
      and HRW executive director Kenneth Roth--RothK @ hrw.org .

      Norman Finkelstein's most recent book is Beyond Chutzpah: On the
      misuse of anti-Semitism and the abuse of history (University of
      California Press). His web site is www.NormanFinkelstein.com.

      *********************************************************************

      WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
      wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
      http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.