Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Reporters find Afghan witnesses US couldn't

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Guardian finds Afghan witnesses US couldn t Declan Walsh in Gardez Friday June 30, 2006 The Guardian, UK The US government said it could not find the men that
    Message 1 of 1 , Jul 5, 2006
      Guardian finds Afghan witnesses US couldn't
      Declan Walsh in Gardez
      Friday June 30, 2006
      The Guardian, UK

      The US government said it could not find the men that Guantánamo
      detainee Abdullah Mujahid believes could help set him free. The
      Guardian found them in three days.

      Two years ago the US military invited Mr Mujahid, a former Afghan
      police commander accused of plotting against the United States, to
      prove his innocence before a special military tribunal. As was his
      right, Mr Mujahid called four witnesses from Afghanistan.

      But months later the tribunal president returned with bad news: the
      witnesses could not be found. Mr Mujahid's hopes sank and he was
      returned to the wire-mesh cell where he remains today.

      The Guardian searched for Mr Mujahid's witnesses and found them
      within three days. One was working for President Hamid Karzai.
      Another was teaching at a leading American college. The third was
      living in Kabul. The fourth, it turned out, was dead. Each witness
      said he had never been approached by the Americans to testify in Mr
      Mujahid's hearing.

      The case illustrates the egregious flaws that have discredited
      Guantánamo-style justice and which led the US supreme court to
      declare such trials illegal on Thursday in a major rebuke to the Bush
      administration. Mr Mujahid is one of 380 Guantánamo detainees whose
      cases were reviewed at "combatant-status review tribunals" in 2004
      and 2005. The tribunals were hastily set up following a court ruling
      that the prisoners, having been denied all normal legal rights,
      should be allowed to prove their innocence. Ten of the hearings
      proceeded to full trials, including that of Osama bin Laden's aide,
      Salim Ahmed Hamdan, who brought the successful supreme court appeal.

      But by the time the review tribunals ended last year the US
      government had located just a handful of the requested witnesses.
      None was brought from overseas to testify. The military lawyers
      simply said they were "non-contactable".

      That was not entirely true.

      Abdullah Mujahid was originally identified by Washington-based
      reporters from the Boston Globe after trawling through thousands of
      pages of testimony from the controversial military trials. US forces
      arrested Mr Mujahid in the southern Afghan city of Gardez in
      mid-2003, claiming he had been fired as police chief due to suspicion
      of "collusion with anti-government forces", according to official
      documents. Later, they alleged, he attacked US forces in retaliation.

      In the military tribunal Mr Mujahid protested his innocence. He
      enjoyed good relations with American soldiers and had been promoted,
      not fired, he said. The three living witnesses he requested were
      easily located with a telephone, an internet connection and a few
      days work.

      Shahzada Massoud was at the presidential palace, where he advises Mr
      Karzai on tribal affairs. Gul Haider, a former defence ministry
      official, was found through the local government in Gardez.

      The interior ministry gave an email address for the former minister,
      Ahmed Ali Jalali, although he could as easily been found on the
      internet - he teaches at the National Defence University in
      Washington DC.

      The witnesses largely corroborated Mr Mujahid's story, with some
      qualifications. Mr Jalali, the former interior minister, said Mr
      Mujahid had been fired over allegations of corruption and bullying -
      not for attacking the government. Mr Haider, the former defence
      official, said Mr Mujahid had contributed 30 soldiers to a major
      operation against al-Qaida in March 2002. "He is completely
      innocent," he said.

      Other Afghans agreed. General Ali Shah Paktiawal, Interpol director
      of the Afghan national police, said: "Some people have given false
      information about him and that's why this problem has come up."

      Their testimonies do not necessarily exonerate Mr Mujahid but at the
      very least raise serious questions about the case against him. An
      Afghan government delegation that recently visited Guantánamo
      estimated that half of the 94 Afghan detainees were not guilty of
      serious crimes and should be released. They did not release any names.

      In Gardez, Haji Muhammad Hasan, 65, keeps a stack of Red Cross
      letters as the only proof of his son's whereabouts. "I feel
      completely helpless," he said in despair. Beside him the detainee's
      shy sons - aged three, four and five - waited for news of a father
      they could hardly recall.

      Lies and old rivalries had sent many innocent Afghans to Guantánamo,
      said Taj Muhammad Wardak, a former governor of Paktiya. "You can
      investigate these people here. There is no need to send them to
      Guantánamo," he said. "It is a great sadness between our countries
      that will last for many years."



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.