Jewish Groups Pocket Homeland Security Funds
- Jewish groups hope they can keep homeland security money flowing
By Ron Kampeas
Jewish Telegraph Agency
WASHINGTON, June 28 (JTA) Jewish groups gratefully absorbed more
than half of the homeland security funds last year aimed at protecting
nonprofits and they're campaigning to make sure the money keeps
An array of Jewish groups nationwide is just now beginning to spend
the $14 million of the $25 million mandated by Congress in 2005 to
secure at-risk nonprofit groups. Another $25 million mandated in the
2006 budget is mired in intergovernmental infighting.
The United Jewish Communities, the umbrella body of the North American
Jewish federation system, is lobbying to make sure the $25 million
allocation survives in the Homeland Security Department's 2007 budget,
due to be referred this week to the full Senate.
"We believe there is a critical threat against Jewish community assets
in the United States," William Daroff, the UJC's vice president for
public policy and its top Washington lobbyist, told JTA. "It doesn't
take a brain surgeon to see that Jewish institutions are near the top
of the terrorists' list."
The senators who sponsored the original legislation, Arlen Specter
(R-Pa.) and Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.), are scrambling to make sure the
money survives the mark-up this week from the Appropriations Committee
to the full Senate.
"We must help protect our hospitals, schools, community centers,
synagogues and churches from terrorist violence," Mikulski said in a
statement to JTA. "This is a federal investment in added security to
help protect organizations at risk of terrorist attacks."
Senators are believed to generally favor the legislation, but are
susceptible to lobbying by a White House that strongly favors
retaining executive power in decisions such as where to spend homeland
The $14 million that Jewish groups received in the 2005 budget reached
18 communities: Atlanta; Baltimore; Broward County, Fla.; Boston;
Chicago; Dallas, the Washington metropolitan area; Houston; Los
Angeles; Long Beach, Calif.; Metrowest, N.J.; Miami; New York;
Philadelphia; Portland, Ore.; San Diego; San Francisco; and Seattle.
No organization could apply for more than $100,000, though some
federations received more because they housed multiple applicants on
the same campus. Most states bar the listing of individual groups for
security reasons, but it's known that New York's Jewish community was
by far the leader in receiving funds, getting about $4.5 million of
$6.3 million allocated to nonprofits in the city.
The funds are an unqualified boon, Jewish leaders agree.
"It was a terrific process. It's going to mean a lot to these
programs," said Ron Soloway, managing director of government and
external relations for UJA-Federation of New York. "Even to this day,
we have parents who worry about the safety of institutions"
accommodating their children in pre-school, day care or school.
It has taken until now to sign the contracts for the services because
of the need to ensure that contractors meet Homeland Security
Department standards. The grants are limited to "target hardening," or
physical and material protections. Applications for programs or
salaried employees are not considered.
Jewish organizations asked for barriers, reinforced doors, blast-proof
windows, security cameras, gates and fencing.
Jewish day schools in the Chicago area, for example, installed a film
on windows to prevent shattering in case of a bomb blast.
"Glass shattering is a major cause of injury and death and serious
injury, especially for kids," said Joel Carp, senior vice president of
the Jewish United Fund/Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago.
The original guidelines for applicants, written when Tom Ridge was
department secretary, seem tailored for Jewish groups. Criteria
included nonprofits that were likely to be targeted by State
Department-designated terrorist groups.
"Prior attacks within or outside the United States by international
terrorist organizations against the nonprofit organizations or
entities associated with or similarly situated as the nonprofit" would
qualify a group for the grant.
According to those criteria, all a Jewish organization had to do and
many did, according to Jewish officials was cite the devastating
bombing of the AMIA Jewish center in Buenos Aires in 1994, widely
believed to have been carried out by Hezbollah, a designated terrorist
It's not clear whether those criteria will apply to the 2007
allocation if it survives this week's budget process. Jewish officials
say a disagreement between Congress and the Bush administration has
dogged the disbursement of the $25 million for 2006. Congress wants
local involvement in deciding which nonprofits get the money, and
wants the Homeland Security Department to consider potential threats
as well as known threats.
Jewish groups say it makes sense to keep the decision making local
because the federations have close relations with municipal and state
"We work very well with state agencies," Carp said.
Some 23 Chicago-area Jewish groups, including four synagogues,
received about half of the $3 million allocated to the city.
According to Jewish and congressional officials, Homeland Security
jealously guards its discretion in how the money is spent and wants to
focus on known threats from groups like Al-Qaida, rather than on
groups that might only theoretically be targeted.
That approach is short-sighted in an age when "freelance" terrorists
are popping up everywhere, said one Jewish official involved in
requesting funds. The official cited a message found scrawled this
week in the hold of a ship importing Guatemalan bananas into
California that read, "This nitro is for you Mr. George W. Bush and
your Jewish cronies."
The origin of the threat, which is still under investigation, is
unknown; the potential target might not appear on a list of groups
known to be targeted by established terrorists.
"The problem is getting the department to shift its thinking away from
known threats and to potential threats," the official said.
Spokesmen for the Homeland Security Department did not return calls
Another factor in the concern over whether the money continues to flow
is perceived government bias against nonprofits. Homeland Security
initially sought to protect private interests and government targets.
Nonprofit officials say their crucial role in stemming the devastation
of last year's hurricane season, at times in place of a floundering
government, has proved the value of protecting nonprofits. Jewish
officials cite Jewish hospitals and mental health clinics that deal
with post-traumatic stress as examples of nonprofits deserving
[NOTE: Throughout the entire Katrina fiasco, not a dollar was cut for
the public funding of Jews-only organizations, nor was a single dollar
diverted from the American funding of "Israel's existence" to the
Katrina homeless. -WVNS]
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW