Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

9/11 Prosecutor Faces Federal Prosecution for Lying to Jury

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 3, 2006
      Detroit Free Press

      Richard Convertino, whose 14-year career as a star federal prosecutor
      earned him commendations for winning high-profile cases, now faces
      federal prosecution himself, accused Wednesday of lying to a jury to
      win terrorism convictions in the first trial to result from the
      federal 9/11 probe.

      A federal grand jury indicted Convertino, 45, and State Department
      security officer Harry Raymond Smith III, 49, who had been assigned to
      the U.S. Embassy in Amman, Jordan, charging them with misleading a
      jury in the 2003 terrorism trial in Detroit.

      Convertino, who resigned last May to enter private practice, flatly
      denied the accusations, reiterating his claims that he is being
      targeted for criticizing the Justice Department about its commitment
      to the war on terrorism. He is suing his former superiors.

      "This indictment is purely vindictive. ... If they believe they can
      scare me off, they've picked the wrong guy to be their scapegoat," he

      Smith's lawyer, Matthew Leitman of Troy, also denied the charges and
      noted his client's service to his country.

      Both men are accused of lying about the existence of photographs that
      could have damaged the prosecution's case in the terror trial, which
      resulted in two convictions that were later set aside at the request
      of Convertino's bosses.

      Had the photos been presented at trial, they could have undercut
      claims that a sketch found in the terror defendants' apartment was
      intended to be used for an attack on a Jordanian military hospital.

      The indictment also says Convertino lied to a judge about a drug
      defendant's cooperation in this and other terrorism investigations so
      that Convertino could get a substantial reduction in the man's sentence.

      Convertino and Smith are charged with conspiring to obstruct justice
      and make false declarations, obstruction of justice and making a
      materially false declaration before a court.

      If convicted, Convertino -- who prosecuted Detroit mob cases and NBA
      star Chris Webber for lying to a grand jury about money he received as
      a college player -- could face 30 years in prison and a $1-million
      fine. Smith could face 20 years in prison and a $750,000 fine. No
      arraignments were set.

      Photos in question

      The case revolves around the convictions in June 2003 of two North
      African immigrants, Karim Koubriti, 27, and Abdel-Ilah Elmardoudi, 40,
      for conspiring to provide support to terrorists.

      A year later, the charges were dismissed at the request of the U.S.
      Attorney's Office, which said Convertino withheld key evidence and
      allowed witnesses, including Smith, to mislead the jury.

      During the terrorism trial, the prosecution maintained that a sketch
      found in Koubriti's flat was a terrorist targeting diagram of a
      military hospital in Amman, Jordan. In support of that theory, Smith
      testified that the sketch was consistent with what he, Convertino and
      FBI case agent Michael Thomas found when they toured the site. Thomas
      was given immunity to testify before the grand jury.

      When defense lawyers asked Smith whether he had taken any photos of
      the site, Smith said no. Wednesday's indictment, however, said Smith
      took photos of the site in March 2002, but they didn't turn out, so he
      asked a colleague to reshoot them. The indictment said the photos were
      turned over to Convertino, who failed to correct Smith's testimony or
      disclose the photos.

      Although witnesses at the trial said a dead tree was depicted in the
      sketch, the photos showed no such landmark, records show. That could
      have raised doubts that the sketch was of the hospital.

      Convertino also is accused of misleading U.S. District Judge Julian
      Cook in July 2003 about the extent of cooperation that drug suspect
      Marwan Farhat provided to the government. The indictment didn't name
      Cook and Farhat.

      Farhat, who pleaded guilty to drug charges, was in line for a 9- to 11
      1/4 -year sentence. Convertino persuaded a reluctant Cook to sentence
      Farhat to eight months, which was covered by the time he had served in
      jail, and seal the records.

      This week, a defense lawyer charged in court papers that Convertino
      engineered other huge sentencing reductions on behalf of drug dealers
      who assisted the government, then had the proceedings sealed to hide
      what he had done. He has denied those accusations.

      Deputy federal defender Richard Helfrick, who represents Koubriti,
      said his client -- who was later indicted in alleged insurance fraud
      -- was pleased to learn of the indictment and plans to be there when
      Convertino is arraigned. Koubriti is out on bond pending the fraud trial.

      Meanwhile, Imad Hamad, regional director of the American-Arab
      Anti-Discrimination Committee, said the indictment is proof the system
      sometimes catches its mistakes.

      "I don't think anything can make up for the injury that was caused to
      the innocent men who were caught in the middle of this prosecution,"
      he said.

      Contact DAVID ASHENFELTER at 313-223-4490.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.