Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Sending mentally ill soldiers back to Iraq

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Reckless disregard for soldiers welfare and for Iraqi lives Sending mentally ill soldiers back to Iraq By Stephen Soldz
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 2 5:27 PM
      Reckless disregard for soldiers' welfare and for Iraqi lives

      Sending mentally ill soldiers back to Iraq
      By Stephen Soldz

      03/27/06 "ICH" -- -- As the US military has difficulties recruiting
      and retaining soldiers for its never-ending war of occupation in Iraq,
      the armed services are resorting to increasingly desperate means of
      coping. The Stop-Loss option in soldiers' contracts has allowed
      soldiers to be kept in uniform months or years after their term of
      service has expired. The National Guard has been sent overseas to a
      previously unprecedented extent. And military standards have been
      lowered, so that drug or alcohol abuse, pregnancy, and poor fitness no
      longer necessarily lead to dismissal of new recruits.

      Now word comes that "mentally ill" troops are being sent back to Iraq.
      [See: Some troops headed back to Iraq are mentally ill] This article
      refers to "a little-discussed truth fraught with implications," but
      the implications discussed all have to do with the effects on the
      soldiers being returned, and these soldiers' "effectiveness in
      combat." In many instances, being returned to combat, and to a state
      of constant tension, will exacerbate the soldier's problems, the
      article -- correctly -- suggests.

      The article indicates that the military is putting pressure on mental
      health professionals treating these soldiers to minimize the extent of
      their problems and to declare them fit for return to Iraq and combat.
      For example, some Army doctors are reporting that they are being told
      to diagnose combat-stress reaction instead of the more serious
      post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Further, the article reports
      that professionals treating emotionally disturbed soldiers "are under
      pressure" to approve their redeployment to Iraq. I have written about
      the moral issues involved in mental health treatment of soldiers in
      Iraq [To Heal or To Patch: Military Mental Health Workers in Iraq].
      The issues are similar for those treating the soldiers when they
      return if the professionals play any role in deciding whether or not
      the soldiers should return to combat. The mental health professionals
      are not in a position to make unbiased judgments as to a soldier's
      readiness to return to combat when their own status and advancement in
      the military may depend upon how they exercise that judgment.

      One "implication" not even mentioned in the article is that sending
      "mentally ill" soldiers back into combat puts not only the soldiers'
      own mental health at risk, but endangers Iraqis as well. What is the
      quality of decision-making by highly stressed soldiers, whether they
      suffer from "PTSD" or only from "combat-stress reaction"? These
      soldiers are armed with lethal weapons and are often in a position to
      make split-second life-or-death decisions. After all, "stress" is
      often used as a defense when other armed authorities, such as police,
      are caught engaging in abusive or even murderous behavior. Surely the
      effects of stress can only be magnified on soldiers who spend a year
      or more being assigned to a country where they can never feel entirely

      We know from the memoirs of US soldiers in Iraq how alienated from
      Iraqis they feel. Thus, Colby Buzzell, in his My War: Killing Time in
      Iraq describes being "hit with the realization that I'm on the other
      side of the planet far away from home, and that I'm a stranger in a
      really strange land" (p. 297).

      These strangers feel so alienated from Iraqis that they have a number
      of names for them. As Kayla Williams tells us in Love My Rifle More
      Than You: Young and Female in the US Army:

      "[W]e called them hajjis, but we also called them sadiqis… or
      habibis…. We called them towelheads. Ragheads. Camel jockeys. The
      fucking locals. Words that didn't see our enemy as people – as
      somebody's father or son or brother or uncle" (p. 200; emphasis in

      Of course, it isn't only "the enemy" that terms like these describe,
      and who aren't seen as people. Ordinary Iraqis of all stripes are
      characterized as the "hajjis" or "the fucking locals."

      Not surprisingly, in such a climate of alienation combined with
      pervasive never-ending danger, even mentally "healthy" soldiers have
      emotional difficulties. For example, Jason Christopher Hartley, author
      of the memoir Just Another Soldier: A Year on the Ground in Iraq,
      describes attempting to refuse leave:

      "[I]n all honesty, I did it because I didn't want to leave Iraq. One
      of the ways to cope with being in combat is to go crazy just a tiny
      bit and learn to enjoy the work… I was afraid that if I left, it would
      be difficult to get back into the `combat is fun' way of thinking when
      I returned" (p. 279).

      If Hartley, by all indications a mentally healthy soldier, was only
      able to survive by going a bit crazy and, in his case, cultivating a
      love of combat, what happens to an emotionally disturbed soldier
      returned to that crazy-making environment? Does (s)he cower in terror,
      perhaps shooting at stimuli little more dangerous than his or her
      shadow, even if those stimuli happen to be Iraqi civilians? Or does
      (s)he perhaps cultivate an even greater love for combat, shooting at
      Iraqis as an expression of a game necessary to transform the pervasive
      fear? Undoubtedly each of these paths is chosen by some. Either
      possibility will increase the odds of adding to the massive Iraqi
      civilian casualties being generated by this war of occupation,
      estimated at about 100,000 in September 2004 and considerably higher
      at this point. [See my 100,000 Iraqis Dead: Should We Believe It? and
      When Promoting Truth Obscures the Truth: More on Iraqi Body Count and
      Iraqi Deaths and Les Roberts: The Iraq War: Do Iraqi Civilian
      Casualties Matter?]

      Soldiers in Iraq routinely make split-second decisions whether to
      shoot or not, such as at the innumerable checkpoints or when on
      convoy. We already know from a study published in the July 1, 2004 New
      England Journal of Medicine [Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan,
      Mental Health Problems, and Barriers to Care: see their Table 2] that
      14% of Army soldiers and 28% of Marines returning from Iraq reported
      "being responsible for the death of a noncombatant." To deploy
      mentally unstable soldiers [not to mention those with drug or alcohol
      problems] likely will increase these horrific numbers. This policy of
      returning potentially unstable soldiers to combat in Iraq is, thus,
      not only a serious threat to the mental health of the soldiers, but a
      threat to occupied Iraqis. This policy, already reprehensible because
      of the danger it poses to the long-term mental health of the US
      troops, is also in its reckless disregard for Iraqi lives yet another
      example of the innumerable war crimes being committed against the
      Iraqi people.

      Stephen Soldz is psychoanalyst, psychologist, public health
      researcher, and faculty member at the Institute for the Study of
      Violence of the Boston Graduate School of Psychoanalysis. He is a
      member of Roslindale Neighbors for Peace and Justice and founder of
      Psychoanalysts for Peace and Justice. He maintains the Iraq Occupation
      and Resistance Report web page and the Psyche, Science, and Society blog.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.