Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Bob Finch: America Vanquished

Expand Messages
  • World View
    It is ironic that anti-racists are willing to challenge the Jewish establishment s view of the holocaust but not the issue of Jewish world domination , writes
    Message 1 of 1 , Apr 2, 2006
      "It is ironic that anti-racists are willing to challenge the Jewish
      establishment's view of the holocaust but not the issue of Jewish
      world domination", writes Bob Finch in this second powerful essay. He
      goes well beyond our usual complaints. He does not stop at his
      critique of Zionism, he is not being attracted by the holocaust
      debate. He takes up the punch line of Shamir's Vampire Killers: "it is
      not a myth which sustains the Jewish state – it is Jewish global
      power. It is power which sustains myths". Bob Finch goes for jugular,
      for the absolutely forbidden question of Jewish power from our
      non-racist position. While good people bewail the multibillion
      subsidies provided by America to the Jewish state, Bob Finch states
      unashamedly: "But these are not subsidies. They are tribute payments
      that the vanquished pay to their conquerors." He calls upon us to deal
      with this question of power instead of secondary one, how it is used.
      It is also refreshing that Finch avoids such cliché euphemism as
      "Israel Lobby" or "Israeli influence", but refers us to the true
      culprit – the organised Jewry. He concludes: "It has become absurd to
      believe that the JOS is an American colony. On the contrary, America
      now resembles a Jewish colony. America is not merely ruled by a Jewish
      elite, it has become the biggest prize in the global Jewish empire." -
      Israel Shamir

      Note: JOS stands for "Jews-Only State"

      America Vanquished
      By Bob Finch

      Historically, holocaust denial has been a political tactic used
      primarily by extreme right wing political parties. However, a small
      number of anti-racists have gone beyond criticisms of the racist
      policies of the Jews-Only state in Palestine (JOS) to question various
      aspects of Jewish holocaust propaganda. These commentators believe
      such propaganda is used politically to justify the oppression of
      Palestinians so they hope that holocaust questioning might help to
      undermine this oppression. Norman Finkelstein exposed the fabrications
      and extortionate practices of what he's called the Jewish holocaust
      industry, `There's no business like Shoah business'. Lenni Brenner has
      highlighted Zionist collaboration with the Nazis in the mass slaughter
      of Jews during the second world war (see `Zionism in the Age of the
      Dictators' and also `51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis').

      Since Ariel Sharon became the JOS's prime minister in 2001, the
      oppression of Palestinians has reached such heights of obscenity that
      an increasing number of anti-racists have joined the fray against
      Jewish holocaust propaganda. Some have raised questions about
      particular facts believed to have taken place during the second world
      war. Others have questioned the so-called Jewish holocaust on
      conceptual grounds e.g. that the holocaust is a racist concept for
      focusing solely on the slaughter of Jews. Some anti-racists have
      expressed doubts about the wisdom of enshrining the establishment view
      of the Jewish holocaust in law and then making it a criminal offence
      to challenge such a view. In 1963, Hannah Arendt, one of the foremost
      scholars of totalitarianism, estimated in `Eichmann in Jerusalem' that
      the Nazis killed between four and a half million to six million Jews.
      If she was alive today and uttered such a view it is possible she
      would be deemed a "holocaust denier" and even thrown in prison.
      Arendt's punishment for expressing such a view in the mid-1960s was
      condemnation, and then ostracism, by Jewish communities around the
      world but only the most extreme Zionists would have doubted her
      historical scholarship or thought she deserved imprisonment.

      There is no doubt the JOS has used holocaust propaganda to legitimize
      its racist treatment of Palestinians. The Jewish holocaust industry
      has exploited holocaust propaganda to extort huge sums of money from
      European countries which were then used to fund racist causes in the
      JOS. Anti-racists are rightly and justly raising questions about the
      strong links between what happened during the age of totalitarianism
      and what the JOS has been doing to Palestinians over the last sixty years.

      It is paradoxical, however, that whilst some anti-racists are now
      willing to engage in holocaust questioning, the one issue they do not
      address, the last remaining Jewish taboo, is Jewish political power.
      The only well known anti-racist who has confronted this issue is Ralph
      Nader, "The subservience of our congressional and White House puppets
      to Israeli military policy has been consistent. They're almost all
      puppets. There are two sets: Congressional puppets and White House
      puppets. When the chief puppeteer (Sharon) comes to Washington, the
      puppets prance." (Pat Buchanan `Ralph Nader: Conservatively Speaking'
      The American Conservative
      http://www.amconmag.com/2004_06_21/cover.html June 21, 2004). Nader
      has never repeated this statement or elaborated upon it or sought to
      use it as the basis for policies to counter such distortions of
      political power. Perhaps the reason for this is that nobody came to
      his defence when the Jewish lobby accused him of anti-semitism. It has
      been quietly dumped into the dustbin of history. (But even Nader
      considers Sharon, the PM of JOS, `the chief puppeteer' instead of
      seeing him as a minor official in the bigger setup. ISH)

      Anti-racists, like virtually everyone else in the western world,
      maintain that America is the world's hyper-power. From this
      perspective, the JOS can be seen only as an American colony -
      dependent on America's military, technological, and economic, support
      for survival. Anti-racists are willing to risk being condemned as
      anti-semites for challenging the racist nature of the JOS. They are
      willing to endure condemnation for casting the merest conceptual or
      empirical shadow over the establishment view of the so-called Jewish
      holocaust. But, they are not willing to challenge the Jewish taboo
      over the idea of Jewish political power in the western world, "It is
      an old canard that Jews control America and American foreign policy,"
      Foxman said. "During both world wars, anti-semites said that Jews
      manipulated America into war." (Jeffrey Blankfort `A War for Israel'
      http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html April 2004).
      But what better way is there of camouflaging Jewish world domination
      than behind such a hoary old canard? Indeed, the fact that this taboo
      has become an accepted norm throughout the western world is yet one
      more piece of evidence pointing to the existence of Jewish world
      domination. It is ironic that anti-racists are willing to challenge
      the Jewish establishment's view of the holocaust but not the issue of
      Jewish world domination even though, politically, their reasons for
      doing the former also apply to the latter.

      Andrew Winkler's article 'Deadly Chess Game' is a classic of this
      genre. Winkler believes "Iran is also threatening the moral and
      ideological base of Israel: the 'Holocaust Myth'." He encourages the
      left to re-examine the propaganda of the Jewish holocaust because he
      believes this would threaten the survival of the JOS. "If
      world-opinion came to believe, as an increasing number of historians
      claim, that the Holocaust was nothing but a propaganda lie, designed
      pre-dominantly for the purpose of mounting support for the creation of
      a Jewish state in Palestine, it would become impossible for the US
      government to continue pumping billions of Dollars in military and
      financial aid into its de-facto colony Israel and backup Israel's
      brutal oppression of the Palestinian people through the ruthless abuse
      of its veto right in the UN Security Council." (Andrew Winkler 'Deadly
      Chess Game' http://therebel.org/ Feb 16th 2006).

      Whilst Winkler is willing to engage in holocaust questioning because
      it politically undermines the JOS he continues to support the
      conventional idea of the JOS as an American colony. This stance leads
      him to a somewhat distorted conclusion, "The Jewish State wouldn't
      even exist, if it weren't for the combined effort of the Zionist
      lobby, US government and Stalin, of making the world believe in the
      Holocaust." The so-called Jewish holocaust is certainly used
      politically around the world to evoke political sympathies for the JOS
      but it is not a myth which sustains this apartheid regime – it is
      Jewish global power. It is power which sustains myths. Without power
      myths cannot survive. The prevalence of a myth is a pointer to the
      power which sustains it. Is it not a little bizarre to believe that
      the "Zionist lobby" would spend time and money promoting a myth in the
      hope of winning the world's approval for the survival of the JOS, when
      it can manipulate America into providing the JOS with military and
      political protection irrespective of world opinion?

      The idea of the JOS as a mere American satellite or colony dates back
      to October 1973 when president Richard Nixon airlifted military
      supplies to the beleaguered Jewish army to save it from defeat by Arab
      armies. At the time, this rescue was commonly perceived as America
      coming to the aid of an ally. It was this highly dramatic event which
      led to the image of the JOS as an American colony. Since then this
      view has become a commonly accepted opinion throughout the western
      world. It has been given the seal of approval by western academia.
      Zionists love the image because although it seems to demean the
      stature of the JOS, it once again allows the JOS to present itself
      and, by proxy, Jews around the world, as innocent victims.

      The best known intellectual exponent of the proposition that JOS is an
      American colony is Noam Chomsky. His promotion of this view helped to
      justify its acceptance by those on the left, the anti-apartheid
      movement, the anti-war movement, and even by liberals. Chomsky is the
      chief Rabbi of the left who absolves the JOS of guilt and
      responsibility for its apartheid regime and its military belligerence
      against neighbouring countries. The implication of seeing the JOS as
      an American colony is that America has ordered the JOS to do
      everything for which it has become despised, so all blame and all
      responsibility must be placed on Americans not the JOS. Thus
      Chomskyism proposes that the American government was to blame when
      Ariel Sharon invaded the Lebanon because it forced him to fight a war
      he did not want to fight! The clever racist assumption that Chomsky
      allows to fester here is that what he means by `America' is a country
      ruled by White Anglo Saxon Protestants (WASPs). Since he refuses to
      countenance the idea of Jewish power in America, let alone Jews
      controlling American politics, the only people who could be
      responsible for ordering Sharon to engage in violence, terrorism, and
      warfare at every opportunity are American WASPs!

      Given Chomsky's intellectual stature and authority, few on the left
      have dared to challenge his preposterous, immoral and racist, views.
      Jeffrey Blankfort is one of the few – see for example `The Israel
      Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions'
      http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html c.2004). See
      also Réseau Voltaire's interview of Blankfort (`The Chomsky/Blankfort
      February 20, 2006).

      According to Blankfort, Chomsky's "attempt to portray the US-Israel
      relationship as mirroring that of Washington's relations to its client
      regimes in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Nicaragua, has no basis in
      reality." Blankfort argues, "Also, there were no Salvadoran,
      Nicaraguan or Guatemalan lobbies of any consequence in Washington to
      lavish millions of dollars wooing or intimidating members of Congress;
      no one in the House or Senate from any of those client countries with
      possible dual- loyalties approving multi-billion dollar appropriations
      on an annual basis; none owning major television networks, radio
      stations, newspapers or movie studios, and no trade unions or state
      pension funds investing billions of dollars in their respective
      economies. The closest thing in the category of national lobbies is
      that of Miami's Cuban exiles, whose existence and power the left is
      willing to acknowledge, even though its political clout is miniscule
      compared to that of Israel's supporters." (Jeffrey Blankfort `The
      Israel Lobby and the Left: Uneasy Questions'
      http://www.leftcurve.org/LC27WebPages/IsraelLobby.html c.2004). It is
      ludicrous to regard the JOS as if it was little different from a
      country like Honduras which is dominated by an American multi-national
      corporation producing a single monocultural crop. Hondurans do not own
      a substantial proportion of the American media and pump out an endless
      stream of Honduran propaganda on behalf of national interests of the
      Honduran state. They do not posses a hugely wealthy lobby which bribes
      members of congress into passing legislation supporting Honduras's
      foreign policies. There are not huge numbers of Honduran intellectuals
      in America producing policy papers outlining new foreign policies for
      America which, completely coincidentally, are the same as Honduras's
      foreign policies. There are not large numbers of Hondurans serving in
      the Bush administration. It has to be concluded that it is impossible
      to see the JOS as an American colony.

      This is not the place to outline the history of the Jewish takeover of
      American politics and the rise of Jewish global domination. Suffice it
      to say the JOS has used its nuclear weapons or military power to
      blackmail America into giving it whatever support it needs and that
      the Jewish lobby has manipulated various American administrations into
      fighting proxy Zionist wars. It was pointed out above that America's
      airlifting of military supplies to the JOS during the October 1973 war
      gave rise to the now commonly accepted view of the JOS as an American
      colony. But this interpretation of the airlift is erroneous. Nixon was
      confronted with the choice of protecting a country with no oil or an
      Arab world with a super abundance of oil. To all those left wingers
      who have for decades blithely insisted that America is interested in
      the Middle East solely because of oil such a decision should have been
      a no-brainer. There is no conceivable reason based on America's
      national interests why Nixon should have chosen to support the JOS
      rather than the Arab world. (Please do not suggest that America saw
      the JOS as essential because the Jews provided political and military
      services for America it could not provide for itself. Any number of
      Arab regimes could also have provided exactly the same services if
      asked. Saddam Hussein was all too willing to carry out services for
      America - but when he expected Americans to pay for these services
      they decimated his army). The most plausible reason for Nixon's
      decision is that the JOS used its nuclear weapons to blackmail Nixon
      into providing it with military assistance even though he knew such a
      decision ran counter to America's interests. Nixon must have known the
      Arab world would retaliate by establishing an oil embargo that would
      severely damage America's economic and national interests. And this is
      precisely what happened. The embargo pushed America and the global
      economy into an economic recession that lasted nearly a decade. The
      JOS blackmailed Nixon into sacrificing American interests for the sake
      of the interests of the JOS. "the decision to give $2.2 billion in
      emergency military aid during the October War triggered an Opec oil
      embargo that inflicted considerable damage on Western economies."
      (John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt `The Israel Lobby'
      http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd 2006). In
      other words, America spent $2.2 billion in military aid which then
      cost it hundreds of billions of dollars in lost economic development.
      This pattern of American sacrifice has been repeated ad nauseam ever
      since. What the 1973 airlift really symbolizes is the JOS's power to
      extract whatever it needs from America to boost its own interests even
      at America's expense.

      It is often mentioned that America provides a huge annual subsidy to
      the JOS. Over the decades this has amounted to something in the region
      of $150 billion. "Since the October War in 1973, Washington has
      provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing that given to any
      other state. It has been the largest annual recipient of direct
      economic and military assistance since 1976, and is the largest
      recipient in total since World War Two, to the tune of well over $140
      billion (in 2004 dollars)." (John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt `The
      Israel Lobby' http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March
      23rd 2006). But these are not subsidies. They are tribute payments
      that the vanquished pay to their conquerors.

      Since the October 1973 war Jewish power in America has grown
      immensely. Jews now constitute America's ruling elite. There is no
      longer any necessity for the JOS to use its nuclear weapons or
      military power to blackmail America into fighting wars on its behalf.
      Jewish political power in America is now so dominant it can
      politically manipulate the country into wars for the benefit of the
      JOS – even if these wars are contrary to America's national interests.
      Over the last decade and a half, America's Jewish ruling elite has
      manipulated America into two proxy Zionist wars. The first was to
      remove Saddam from Kuwait and the second was the invasion of Iraq. A
      third one against Iran is pending even though such a war could lead to
      the political, economic, and military, collapse of the United States.
      "When a parasite invades, it hides as long as it can, sucking the
      vital juices and draining the energy of its host. Yet there is a limit
      to what the host can tolerate: eventually, it either builds up an
      immunity to the depredations of its "guest," or it is sucked dry and
      exhausted to the point of near-death. Having used up nearly all
      available military and economic resources in Iraq, the U.S. has a
      choice: it can either build up an immunity to Israeli influence, even
      a partial one, or it can let itself be turned into a dry husk, a
      casualty of Tel Aviv's ambitions." (Justin Raimondo `Spy With a Heart
      of Gold?' http://www.antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=8441 January 25,
      2006). The JOS and the Jewish lobby in America doesn't care how much
      it costs America to fight proxy Zionist wars or how many American
      troops are injured or killed as long as these wars boost the regional
      power of the JOS in the Middle East.

      Over the last decade or so the Jewish colonization of the American
      political system has been comprehensive. The JOS's defence strategy
      has been adopted by America. Its foreign policies have been adopted by
      America. The JOS's contempt for international institutions and
      international law has become a critical part of American politics. Its
      enemies have now become America's enemies even though they pose not
      the slightest threat to America. The racism endemic in the JOS has now
      become rife throughout American politics. This amazing political
      transformation did not happen because a group of WASPs sat down and
      looked into a crystal ball to determine which policies would maximize
      America's interests over the long term. These policies were introduced
      by Jews living in America who put the interests of the JOS first. They
      were then pushed through the American political system by the combined
      weight of the Jewish lobby, the Jewish dominated media, and the
      increasing proportion of Jews in successive presidential
      administrations. "With the assault on Iraq," wrote the distinguished
      historian, David Hirst, "the U.S. was not merely adopting Israel's
      long-established methods - of initiative, offence and pre-emption - ;
      it was also adopting Israel's adversaries as its own..." (quoted in
      Jeffrey Blankfort `A War for Israel'

      http://www.leftcurve.org/LC28WebPages/WarForIsrael.html April 2004).

      At its annual conference this year AIPAC boasted that over the
      previous year it had managed to persuade the American Congress into
      passing one hundred pieces of legislation for the JOS. "AIPAC helps
      pass more than 100 pro-Israel legislative initiatives a year through
      more than 2,000 meetings with members of the U.S. Congress, according
      to AIPAC statistics." Despite the fact that two of AIPAC's most
      important employees are currently on trial for treason against the
      United States, America's politicians turned out in force to pay homage
      to their AIPAC paymasters, "AIPAC's influence was underscored by the
      seeming multitude of government leaders in attendance at the
      conference, the biggest in its 52-year history. This year, half the
      Senate, a quarter of the House and many White House administration
      officials, including vice president Dick Cheney, participated."
      (Denyse Tannenbaum `"European media is questioning Israel's right to
      exist"' www.ejpress.org/article/6686 March 10th 2006).

      The JOS is a racist rogue state and, over the last decade and a half,
      it has transformed America into a rogue hyper-power with increasing
      racist tendencies. It has become absurd to believe that the JOS is an
      American colony. On the contrary, America now resembles a Jewish
      colony. America is not merely ruled by a Jewish elite, it has become
      the biggest prize in the global Jewish empire. It is quite true that
      the American military remains the world's only hyper-power but it is
      America's ruling Jewish elite which controls America's military not
      WASPs. Many of America's WASP military leaders are aghast at the idea
      of being ordered to attack Iran and yet this is precisely the
      direction in which the American military is being pushed by the Jewish
      dominated congress and Bush administration.

      It is the Jewish elite's takeover of the American political system and
      its ability to use America's military hyper-power for the benefit of
      the JOS that gives rise to Jewish global domination. However, Jewish
      world domination is far from complete. For a time Russia was
      controlled by a Jewish elite with allegiance to the JOS but Putin
      managed to wrestle back control of his country for the sake of the
      Russian people although whether he'll be able to fight off the next
      Jewish political assault is far from certain. In Britain, the ruling
      elite is composed of Jews and the landowning aristocracy. The
      aristocrats own much of the countryside whilst the Jewish elite owns
      much of the country's high streets. Whilst the former dominates over
      domestic issues, the latter dominates in foreign affairs.

      There is little evidence that Jews started the second world war. But
      currently there are many Jewish commentators trying to provoke world
      war three (or world war four depending on which commentator you are
      listening to). During its lifetime, the JOS has created millions of
      victims in Palestine, Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, and Iraq, and it
      is about to create a whole lot more if it manages to manipulate its
      American colony into a long war against Iran, Syria, and rest of the
      Moslem world in the Middle East. Under these circumstances, it would
      be folly for political commentators to spend so much time researching
      events surrounding the racist Jewish holocaust that they fail to
      notice that Jewish political power is promoting a new catastrophe not
      merely against six million Palestinians but the Moslem world in the
      Middle East.

      It is almost certainly true that Jews were nothing like as much
      victims of totalitarianism as the racist concept of the Jewish
      holocaust suggests – after all roughly 20 million Russians died during
      this time, far more than the number of Jews. If anti-racists continue
      to focus on the so-called Jewish holocaust, albeit in the hope of
      undermining legitimacy for the JOS, they will perpetuate the fixation
      on Jews as victims – the scope of their argument being confined to
      determining what sort of victim the Jews were. The Jewish people
      suffered terrible losses during the second world war but, since then,
      the JOS has brought about a huge loss of life and, given the chance,
      it will bring about even greater losses in the future. It has to be
      suggested that stopping the next world war is more important than
      dissecting the bowels of the last world war.

      The way in which Jews have acquired economic, media, and political,
      power in America and other western countries since the end of the
      second world war until they are now able to push the world's military
      hyperpower to the brink of a third world war, is an issue on which
      almost no research has been done. (A new work on this issue has just
      been published as this article was being written - John Mearsheimer
      and Stephen Walt `The Israel Lobby'
      http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n06/print/mear01_.html March 23rd 2006). In
      comparison, the amount of research into the so-called Jewish holocaust
      is huge. Surely ascertaining how Jews living in America acquired
      political power in America, and what they are going to do with it, is
      a more urgent priority than politically exploiting events that
      happened 60 years ago?

      By far and away the most important political issue at present is
      Jewish world domination. What matters is not the second world war
      brought about by the German master race but the third world war
      currently being instigated by the Jewish master race. Times have
      changed. The JOS is now far more powerful militarily than the nazis
      ever were. The JOS is creating so many millions of victims it is
      drawing ever closer to the total achieved by the nazis. Jews around
      the world currently agitating for the third world war are just as much
      racist supremacists as the nazis who provoked the second world war.
      Blair and Bush are modern day Chamberlains giving succour to the
      world's new nazis – the Jewish master race.

      There are many facts and figures in the works of Jeffrey Blankfort
      that could contribute towards making the case for Jewish world
      domination. He does not use such a phrase – he talks only of the
      Israelization of America's Middle East policies. His focus has been
      primarily on the Jewish lobby in America so he has overlooked the
      critical role of the JOS's nuclear and military blackmail in
      transforming America's foreign policies. He has also failed to
      appreciate the role the JOS is playing in fostering a Greater
      Kurdistan to help break the Arabs' grip on the Middle East. But he has
      inadvertently raised an important issue in any understanding of the
      nature of Jewish world domination. Is the world's global Jewish elite
      so attached to capitalism and profiteering that it has become entirely
      rootless with no political loyalties to any particular country? Or is
      it so committed to Zionism that it would be willing to sacrifice
      profits and perhaps even capitalism itself if this ensured the
      political and military supremacy of the JOS in the Middle East and
      beyond? This issue bears upon whether there will be a war against
      Iran. If the global Jewish elite is like the former then it will avoid
      an attack on Iran because such a war could seriously damage the global
      economic system. If, however, it is like the latter then it will
      demand a war because no matter how much the world, or the capitalist
      system, or America, might be damaged it would be a huge boost to
      Jewish supremacism in the Middle East. "If there are truly elites who
      are pulling the strings in Washington and control Tel Aviv, as we are
      often told, there will be no attack because those elites would
      certainly be aware of the consequences it will have for the
      free-market capitalist system that they cherish. If there is an
      attack, it will be yet another proof that Washington is Israel's most
      important occupied territory, despite the efforts of a handful of
      brave individuals there to expose and bring a halt to the
      Israelization of US Middle East policy. I don't like the concept of
      elites, but I do not think there will be an attack and that the drum
      beats are designed to scare Iran because there are no other realistic
      options available. Nevertheless, beware the Ides of March." (Jeffrey
      Blankfort `War within Range? Another Neocon beats the drums for war
      and says it will happen in 10 weeks' jblankfort@... c. Jan
      7th 2006). In other words, does the Jewish global elite have a
      god-given sanctuary in Palestine or does it not care about this
      Judaically sacrosanct land?

      This article does not present the case for Jewish world domination. It
      suggests the time has long since passed when the idea of Jewish world
      domination should be deemed to be preposterous or treated as morally
      abhorrent. There is plenty of evidence pointing in the direction of
      Jewish world domination. For example: the willingness of American
      politicians to criticize the president of the United States but their
      total reluctance to criticize the JOS. Western governments' acceptance
      of the JOS as a western, liberal, secular democracy rather than
      criticizing it for being a racist state. It is more absurd to believe
      that America is the world's hyperpower and that the JOS is just an
      American colony than it is to believe in Jewish world domination. This
      article seeks to change political priorities from the so-called Jewish
      holocaust of the past to the Jewish inspired catastrophe of a third
      world war. The so-called war against terrorism is a racist war
      initiated by Jewish supremacists designed to boost Jewish world
      domination. We can either live in world that seeks to combat racism or
      in a world where Jewish racism is accepted as a normal part of
      everyday life. In the latter case Jews would rule the world.

      Bob Finch



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.