Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Charley Reese: Pluses & Minuses

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Pluses but Mostly Minuses Charley Reese December 31, 2005 http://www.antiwar.com/reese/?articleid=8325 Now that President Bush has launched a new propaganda
    Message 1 of 1 , Jan 6, 2006
    • 0 Attachment
      Pluses but Mostly Minuses
      Charley Reese
      December 31, 2005

      Now that President Bush has launched a new propaganda campaign to
      convince Americans that we are winning the war in Iraq, it's a good
      idea to go back to the basics and look at the pluses and minuses of
      this war.

      The minuses we all know. The war was sold on false pretenses, there
      being neither weapons of mass destruction nor ties to al-Qaeda,
      which after all, was responsible for the attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.
      Saddam Hussein's government was secular, and the majority of people
      in Iraq are Shi'ites. Al-Qaeda is a fanatical religious movement
      that is Sunni, which is why you need never fear that al-Qaeda will
      take over Iraq.

      The other minuses are the loss of American prestige, nearly 2,200
      dead, about 16,000 wounded, and $221 billion and counting in money.
      So, that's the downside of the Iraq War. What's the upside?

      Well, for the sake of argument, let's assume we do win the war,
      however strangely the Bush administration might decide to define
      victory. But let's assume we win. The insurgents are defeated. An
      elected government of pro-Iranian Shi'ites is in charge. What are
      the benefits to the American people?

      When a young Marine asked that of Vice President Dick Cheney, he
      reeled off a list of benefits for the Iraqi people, but said not a
      word about Americans. Since victory (stipulated only for the sake of
      argument) is paid for by American blood and American treasure, some
      benefit should accrue to the American people. What?

      I can't think of any. That's too high a price just to feel good that
      we did a bunch of foreigners a favor by relieving them of their
      homegrown dictator. You could argue, I suppose, that after victory
      Americans could visit Iraq as tourists, though on this beautiful
      planet Iraq is not quite – but almost – dead last on the list of
      scenic places to visit. Besides, it will be decades before Iraqis
      get over their hostility to Americans, who since 1991 have made
      their lives miserable with two wars, periodic bombings and cruel

      Americans jolly well won't be safer. The pathetic and infantile
      argument that if the terrorists weren't fighting us in Iraq they'd
      be in New York is not worth talking about. Ninety percent of the
      people fighting us in Iraq are not terrorists, but insurgents who
      resent the occupation of their country by a foreign power. The other
      10 percent are using Iraq as a training ground. After we leave Iraq,
      some of those might attack us in other places, but they would have
      anyway. Just because it's been four years since the 9/11 attacks
      doesn't mean al-Qaeda has given up or even been thwarted by our
      bureaucrats. There was a long time gap between the first attack on
      the World Trade Center and the second. Al-Qaeda is patient.

      That, by the way, is another downside to the Iraq War. Al-Qaeda was
      our enemy, not Iraq, and we have aided al-Qaeda by invading a Muslim
      country as well as diverting resources that could have been directed
      at finding and killing Osama bin Laden.

      As for the original neoconservative belief that a democratic Iraq
      would infect the rest of the Middle East and Israel could live
      peacefully, that was a joke from Day One. The only friends Israel
      and we have in the Middle East are the dictators we pay, in one way
      or another, to be our friends. Popularly elected governments would
      make it quite clear they hate Israel and the U.S.

      I can tell you one positive thing about this war, if the American
      people will learn from it. We should never, ever again allow a bunch
      of academic ideologues and Washington lawyers who don't know crap
      about the real world to gain control of American foreign policy.

      The next American president should ask two questions of all the
      people who present themselves as Middle East experts. Have you lived
      in an Arab country? Do you speak and read Arabic? If the answers are
      no, then he should say, "Hit the road, Jack." Twenty-two hundred
      Americans probably would be alive if Bush had asked those questions
      of his neoconservative warmongers.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.