Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Lockerbie evidence was faked

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked by MARCELLO MEGA http://news.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=1855852005 Aug. 28, 2005 A FORMER Scottish police chief has
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 8, 2005
      Police chief- Lockerbie evidence was faked


      Aug. 28, 2005

      A FORMER Scottish police chief has given lawyers a signed statement
      claiming that key evidence in the Lockerbie bombing trial was fabricated.

      The retired officer - of assistant chief constable rank or higher -
      has testified that the CIA planted the tiny fragment of circuit board
      crucial in convicting a Libyan for the 1989 mass murder of 270 people.

      The police chief, whose identity has not yet been revealed, gave the
      statement to lawyers representing Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi,
      currently serving a life sentence in Greenock Prison.

      The evidence will form a crucial part of Megrahi's attempt to have a
      retrial ordered by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
      (SCCRC). The claims pose a potentially devastating threat to the
      reputation of the entire Scottish legal system.

      The officer, who was a member of the Association of Chief Police
      Officers Scotland, is supporting earlier claims by a former CIA agent
      that his bosses "wrote the script" to incriminate Libya.

      Last night, George Esson, who was Chief Constable of Dumfries and
      Galloway when Megrahi was indicted for mass murder, confirmed he was
      aware of the development.

      But Esson, who retired in 1994, questioned the officer's motives. He
      said: "Any police officer who believed they had knowledge of any
      element of fabrication in any criminal case would have a duty to act
      on that. Failure to do so would call into question their integrity,
      and I can't help but question their motive for raising the matter now."

      Other important questions remain unanswered, such as how the officer
      learned of the alleged conspiracy and whether he was directly involved
      in the inquiry. But sources close to Megrahi's legal team believe they
      may have finally discovered the evidence that could demolish the case
      against him.

      An insider told Scotland on Sunday that the retired officer approached
      them after Megrahi's appeal - before a bench of five Scottish judges -
      was dismissed in 2002.

      The insider said: "He said he believed he had crucial information. A
      meeting was set up and he gave a statement that supported the
      long-standing rumours that the key piece of evidence, a fragment of
      circuit board from a timing device that implicated Libya, had been
      planted by US agents.

      "Asked why he had not come forward before, he admitted he'd been wary
      of breaking ranks, afraid of being vilified.

      "He also said that at the time he became aware of the matter, no one
      really believed there would ever be a trial. When it did come about,
      he believed both accused would be acquitted. When Megrahi was
      convicted, he told himself he'd be cleared at appeal."

      The source added: "When that also failed, he explained he felt he had
      to come forward.

      "He has confirmed that parts of the case were fabricated and that
      evidence was planted. At first he requested anonymity, but has backed
      down and will be identified if and when the case returns to the appeal

      The vital evidence that linked the bombing of Pan Am 103 to Megrahi
      was a tiny fragment of circuit board which investigators found in a
      wooded area many miles from Lockerbie months after the atrocity.

      The fragment was later identified by the FBI's Thomas Thurman as being
      part of a sophisticated timer device used to detonate explosives, and
      manufactured by the Swiss firm Mebo, which supplied it only to Libya
      and the East German Stasi.

      At one time, Megrahi, a Libyan intelligence agent, was such a regular
      visitor to Mebo that he had his own office in the firm's headquarters.

      The fragment of circuit board therefore enabled Libya - and Megrahi -
      to be placed at the heart of the investigation. However, Thurman was
      later unmasked as a fraud who had given false evidence in American
      murder trials, and it emerged that he had little in the way of
      scientific qualifications.

      Then, in 2003, a retired CIA officer gave a statement to Megrahi's
      lawyers in which he alleged evidence had been planted.

      The decision of a former Scottish police chief to back this claim
      could add enormous weight to what has previously been dismissed as a
      wild conspiracy theory. It has long been rumoured the fragment was
      planted to implicate Libya for political reasons.

      The first suspects in the case were the Syrian-led Popular Front for
      the Liberation of Palestine - General Command (PFLP-GC), a terror
      group backed by Iranian cash. But the first Gulf War altered
      diplomatic relations with Middle East nations, and Libya became the
      pariah state.

      Following the trial, legal observers from around the world, including
      senior United Nations officials, expressed disquiet about the verdict
      and the conduct of the proceedings at Camp Zeist, Holland. Those
      doubts were first fuelled when internal documents emerged from the
      offices of the US Defence Intelligence Agency. Dated 1994, more than
      two years after the Libyans were identified to the world as the
      bombers, they still described the PFLP-GC as the Lockerbie bombers.

      A source close to Megrahi's defence said: "Britain and the US were
      telling the world it was Libya, but in their private communications
      they acknowledged that they knew it was the PFLP-GC.

      "The case is starting to unravel largely because when they wrote the
      script, they never expected to have to act it out. Nobody expected
      agreement for a trial to be reached, but it was, and in preparing a
      manufactured case, mistakes were made."

      Dr Jim Swire, who has publicly expressed his belief in Megrahi's
      innocence, said it was quite right that all relevant information now
      be put to the SCCRC.

      Swire, whose daughter Flora was killed in the atrocity, said last
      night: "I am aware that there have been doubts about how some of the
      evidence in the case came to be presented in court.

      "It is in all our interests that areas of doubt are thoroughly examined."

      A spokeswoman for the Crown Office said: "As this case is currently
      being examined by the SCCRC, it would be inappropriate to comment."

      No one from the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland was
      available to comment.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.