Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Arabs shouldn't have to apologize

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Mansour El-Kikhia: Arabs shouldn t have to apologize 07/29/2005 San Antonio Express-News I am fed up with the ceaseless requests by columnists, religious
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 7, 2005
    • 0 Attachment
      Mansour El-Kikhia: Arabs shouldn't have to apologize
      07/29/2005
      San Antonio Express-News


      I am fed up with the ceaseless requests by columnists, religious
      personalities and other American public figures for Arabs and Muslims
      to apologize for terrorist acts committed by thugs and murderers in
      the name of Islam.

      As far as I am concerned, the final straw came a couple of weeks ago
      when the Council on American-Islamic Relations, or CAIR, paid for a
      national advertisement repudiating terrorism in the name of Islam.

      As soon as the advertisement was broadcast on America's media, I read
      a column by one of the nation's most ardent Islam-phobic columnists,
      Cal Thomas, now also a FOX News personality, which plowed into CAIR's
      reconciliation efforts. Long before 9-11, Thomas' writings were full
      of venom for Arabs and Muslims. He represents a despicable and
      ignorant attitude that, unfortunately, a sizable segment of America
      has come to share. There is nothing American Muslims can do to satisfy
      this group short of packing up and leaving the United States.

      I disagree with what CAIR did, and I also disagree with this groveling
      and begging for forgiveness, as though American Arabs and Muslims are
      responsible for those atrocities. CAIR knows better, and those running
      it know that Islam rejects all acts of violence outside self-defense.
      Arab and Muslim Americans are responsible for neither the twin towers
      nor the London subway bombings, and as Americans they should never
      accept responsibility for actions they did not instigate, commit or
      condone.

      Furthermore, in spite of the fact they are constantly condemned for
      one thing or another, they â€" like other Americans â€" are victims of
      these murderers. Does anyone think they are pleased to have their
      movements and telephone conversations monitored or that coercive and
      freedom-depriving laws are tailored for them? Does anyone in his or
      her right mind really believe that being an Arab American or a Muslim
      is pleasant in America today?

      The United States has lost 3,000 souls to terrorist thugs, but that
      figure is miniscule compared to the 60,000 Algerians or the 25,000
      Iraqis who also have died at their hands. These thugs don't
      differentiate between Muslim and non-Muslim, Arab and non-Arab when
      they plant a bomb or enter a village at night and murder everyone.

      It is rejection of U.S. and British policies in the Middle East, not
      Islam, that has promoted terrorism against America. And for the
      benefits of those who do not know, 95 percent of Middle Easterners are
      Muslims. Hence, it is only natural that those opposing the United
      States and Britain in the region would be Muslims. In India, they
      would have been Hindu; in Latin America or Northern Ireland, they
      would have been Catholic.

      More important, it was the British and the United States that drew
      first blood. The Middle East didn't come to America or go to Britain;
      rather, America and Britain went to the Middle East. Both powers used
      and abused regimes, toppling some and keeping others in power. They
      never thought that the people they were helping suppress were human
      beings with needs, beliefs and emotions. They didn't care as long as
      their interests were served.

      America's experience in the Middle East is no different from its
      Southeast Asia stint, and look at the mess it left in that region.

      However, while the calamity of Vietnam, Laos and Kampuchea might be
      rationalized by the Cold War or even a domino theory, there is nothing
      to rationalize the invasion of Iraq except ideological stupidity. The
      United States illegally invaded and decimated a country that did not
      threaten its security and, in the process, unleashed one of the most
      vile and ruthless insurgencies the region has ever seen. And as it did
      in Vietnam, when the going got tough, it is planning to pull out. The
      result will be a protracted instability and turmoil that no country in
      the region can escape.

      Future turmoil in the region is exactly what the instigators of the
      Iraq invasion have planned all along. They had made their desire for
      strife in the Middle East known long before the invasion of Iraq. Yet
      they underestimated the consequences of their lunacy and set into
      motion processes and events that will make the United States less
      secure and threaten the lives of Americans for many years to come.

      *********************************************************************

      WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
      wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
      http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.