Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Disengagement Without Justice

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Disengagement Without Justice Tuesday, August 02, 2005 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/28/AR2005072800517.html Gaza Withdrawal The
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 7 1:43 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      Disengagement Without Justice
      Tuesday, August 02, 2005
      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/28/AR2005072800517.html


      Gaza Withdrawal The unilateral Israeli disengagement from the Gaza
      Strip is set to take place in roughly two weeks. Although the
      Palestinians in Gaza will no doubt be happy about the fact that Jewish
      colonies such as Nezarim, Gush Katif, Neve Dekalim, Morag, Erez, etc.
      will become Palestinian controlled land, Palestinians such as
      journalist Laila El-Haddad question what this disengagement has to do
      with either peace or justice.

      El-Haddad, a Palestinian mother of one and journalist, was recently
      forced to wait at the northern border of Gaza for eight hours in an
      attempt to visit the West Bank, before being denied entry simply
      because she was from Gaza. Haddad was told by an Israeli soldier that
      simply because she was a Palestinian from Gaza she is "considered a
      security threat first, a journalist second."

      Will this mentality change just because a few thousand people are
      moved a few miles north?

      Israel still reserves the right to re-enter Gaza for security reasons,
      and the current withdrawal does not include Israeli forfeiture of
      power over the seaports, the airport, or the borders. Another issue
      without any certain answer is how Palestinians may move between Gaza
      and the West Bank. While there are discussions under way between the
      Israelis and Egyptians, Israelis and the Palestinian Authority, James
      Wolfensohn and all parties, and the US State Department and all
      parties, there has been little concrete progress as far as how the
      disengagement will actually be carried out.

      In all of the confusion surrounding the withdrawal, El-Haddad argues
      that the "politico-strategic maneuver" of Sharon should be seen for
      just that. El-Haddad sees little concern from the Israeli or American
      goverments about preventing the occupation of Gaza from becoming the
      "prison" of Gaza. The concrete steps that must be implemented to
      prevent this include tranferring control of borders, seaports, and
      airports to Palestinians, or perhaps, in the case of the Philadelphi
      area between Gaza and Egypt, to Egyptians.

      El-Haddad also argues that the situation should be seen as a
      whole--the continued construction of the Separation Wall and of Jewish
      colonies in the West Bank cannot be forgotten simply because of the
      evacuation of a few thousand illegal settlers.

      As El-Haddad sums up the situation so simply, "while disengagement
      will bring some relief for Gazans, it is by no means the end of the
      Israeli occupation."

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/28/AR2005072800517.html

      *********************************************************************

      WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
      wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
      http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.