Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Hiroshima Footage Suppressed for Decades

Expand Messages
  • World View
    U.S. Suppressed Footage of Hiroshima for Decades The New York Times August 3, 2005 http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-media-anniversary.html? WASHINGTON
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 4 2:34 PM
    • 0 Attachment
      U.S. Suppressed Footage of Hiroshima for Decades
      The New York Times
      August 3, 2005
      http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/news/news-media-anniversary.html?


      WASHINGTON (Reuters) - As the world prepares to mark the 60th
      anniversary of the dropping of the first atomic bomb on Saturday, some
      American media experts see uncomfortable echoes between the
      suppression of images of death and destruction then and coverage of
      the war in Iraq today.

      As author Greg Mitchell lays out in an article in Editor & Publisher
      this week, in the weeks following the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and
      Nagasaki, U.S. authorities seized and suppressed film shot in the
      bombed cities by U.S. military crews and Japanese newsreel teams to
      prevent Americans from seeing the full extent of devastation wrought
      by the new weapons.

      Tens of thousands died in each attack.

      The U.S. military footage shot in color was classified as secret. It
      remained hidden until the early 1980s and has never been fully aired.
      The Japanese film shot in black and white was declassified and
      returned to Japan in the late 1960s.

      Some of the images captured in the days after the bombings will
      finally be shown on a U.S. cable television channel as part of a
      documentary on Saturday.

      ``Although there are clearly huge differences with Iraq, there are
      also some similarities,'' said Mitchell, co-author of ``Hiroshima in
      America'' and editor of Editor & Publisher.

      ``The chief similarity is that Americans are still being kept at a
      distance from images of death, whether of their own soldiers or Iraqi
      civilians,'' he said.

      In May, the Los Angeles Times released a survey of six months of media
      coverage of the Iraq war in six prominent U.S. newspapers and two
      newsmagazines -- a period during which 559 coalition forces, the vast
      majority American, were killed. It found they had run almost no
      photographs of Americans killed in action. The same publications ran
      only 44 photos to represent the thousands of Westerners wounded during
      that same time.

      ``There's a mixture of censorship and self-censorship. In an
      information age, unfortunately what is missing is truthful and factual
      information,'' said Yahya Kamalipour, a communications professor at
      Purdue University in Indiana and author of ``Bring 'Em On: Media and
      Politics in the Iraq War.''

      Examples of overt censorship are the Pentagon's ban on filming the
      coffins of dead servicemen and women being brought back to Dover Air
      Force Base in Delaware, as well as its continuing legal fight to
      prevent the publication of photographs and videos of detainee abuse in
      Abu Ghraib prison.

      'TOO SHOCKING'

      Self-censorship happens when individual editors decide not to run
      photographs or footage of casualties because they deem them ``too
      shocking'' for readers or because they wish to avoid controversy or
      criticism.

      ``So much of the media is owned by big corporations and they would
      much rather focus on making money than setting themselves up for
      criticism from the White House and Congress,'' said Ralph Begleiter, a
      former CNN correspondent, now a journalism professor at the University
      of Delaware.

      Last October, Begleiter filed a lawsuit to force the Pentagon to
      release military photographs and video of the coffins being returned.

      In April, the Pentagon made public more than 700 images all taken
      before June 2004. Begleiter said it appeared the military had stopped
      taking pictures of casualties being returned to avoid being forced to
      release more images.

      In May 2004, when ABC's Nightline screened the names and photos of 721
      U.S. forces killed in the Iraq war without any commentary, it caused
      furor. One company which owned eight ABC stations ordered them not to
      show the program and some conservatives denounced it as an anti-war
      gimmick.

      One month before, when four U.S. contractors were murdered in Fallujah
      and their charred bodies were strung up from a bridge, most TV
      stations did not use the images. A survey of the 20 top circulating
      newspapers in the United States found only seven put a picture of the
      bodies on their front pages.

      In 1945, U.S. policymakers wanted to be able to continue to develop
      and test atomic and eventually nuclear weapons without an outcry of
      public opinion.

      ``They succeeded but the subject is still a raw nerve. Americans
      remain very divided about nuclear weapons. We'll never know what
      impact the footage, if widely aired, might have had on the nuclear
      arms race and nuclear proliferation that plagues and endangers us
      today,'' Mitchell said.

      *********************************************************************

      WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
      wvns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
      http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.