Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Globalists Created Wahhabi Terrorism

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Four militants killed in shootout in S. Arabia ... RIYADH, Jan 9: Four wanted militants were killed on Sunday in a shootout with security forces in a desert
    Message 1 of 1 , Feb 15, 2005
      Four militants killed in shootout in S. Arabia
      RIYADH, Jan 9: Four wanted militants were killed on Sunday in a
      shootout with security forces in a desert area in Saudi Arabia,
      where the government is battling a wave of attacks by Al Qaeda
      linked militants, the interior ministry said.

      The gunfight resulted in "the death of four... members of the
      deviant group," a term used to describe Al Qaeda sympathizers, a
      ministry spokesman said in a statement carried by SPA news


      Globalists Created Wahhabi Terrorism to Destroy Islam and Justify a
      Global State
      by David Livingstone

      The 'House' of Saud — no more Islamic than Billy Graham

      Following the dictates of Hegelian dialectic, the Globalists have
      created two antagonizing forces, the "Liberal-Democratic" West,
      against Terrorism, or "political Islam", to force us into the
      acceptance of their final alternative, a New World Order.

      The West and Islam have had a long era of compatibility, but this
      history has been denied to foster the myth of a "Clash of
      Civilizations". In order to inflame the sentiments of the West
      against Islam, our attention has been focused on the specter of
      fanatical Wahhabism, and more specifically, its most notorious
      exponent, Osama bin Laden.

      However, as outlined in an excellent article by Peter Goodgame, The
      Globalists and the Islamists, the Globalists have had a hand in
      shaping and financing all the terrorist organizations of the
      twentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Hamas
      of Palestine and the Afghan Mujahideen. But the history of their
      duplicity dates farther back still, to the 18th Century, when
      British Freemasons created the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia itself,
      to further their imperialistic objectives.

      That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for
      shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a
      Turkish work, Mir'at al-Haramain, by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-
      1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of
      deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with
      the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century.

      The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known
      document by the name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in
      series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel, and later in a
      prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to
      the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English
      and other languages.

      The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for
      his government, which sent him to the Middle East to discover ways
      to undermine the Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to
      promote were racism and nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication
      and tempting Muslim women to uncover themselves.

      But most important was the strategy to "insert heresies into
      Muslims' creedal tenets and then criticize Islam for being a
      religion of terror." To this purpose, Hempher located a particularly
      corrupt individual by the name of Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab.

      To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it
      is first necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims,
      regardless of their race or nationality, to see themselves as
      brothers in faith. The killing of another Muslim was strictly

      However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the
      British hoped to pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish
      brothers. The only way to do so was to find a loophole in Islamic
      law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as apostates.

      Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to
      insinuate this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula.
      Basically, Wahhab contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act
      of offering prayers to saints, their Turkish brethren had forfeited
      their faith, and therefore, that it was permitted to kill all who
      refused to adhere to his reforms, and to enslave their women and
      children. But that included the entire Muslim world, except for his
      small misguided band of followers.

      But the Wahabbi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of
      the Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from
      Jewish merchants from Iraq. Orthodox jurists of the time branded the
      Wahhabis as heretics and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance.
      Nevertheless, the Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for
      their pretended faith by indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and
      non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then set about destroying all the
      holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the Prophet's treasure,
      which included holy books, works of art and innumerable priceless
      gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The
      leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had
      destroyed were used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals.

      The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in
      1818, but the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal
      I. The movement was then somewhat restored until once again
      destroyed at the end of the nineteenth century.

      After WWI, the former regions of the Ottoman Empire were divided
      into varying puppets regimes. For aiding to undermine the Ottoman
      authority in the region, Ibn Saud was duly rewarded with the
      creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932. One year later, in
      1933, the Saudis granted oil concessions to California Arabian
      Standard Oil Company (Casoc), affiliate of Standard Oil of
      California (Socal, today's Chevron), headed by Rothschild agent, and
      chief among [US] Illuminati families, Rockefeller. Since that time,
      Saudi Arabia has been the most important ally to the West in the
      Middle East, not only providing ready access to its plentiful oil
      reserves, but also in tempering Arab aggression against Israel. Due
      to the evident hypocrisy of the regime, it has been necessary to
      suppress the ensuing dissent with brutality. Another important
      aspect has been preventing scholars from speaking of "politics",
      that is, to criticize the regime.

      In The Two Faces of Islam, Stephen Schwartz writes, "Their tastes
      led them to taverns, casinos, brothels ... They bought fleets of
      automobiles, private jets, and yachts the size of warships. They
      invested in valuable Western art they did not understand or like and
      which often offended the sensitivities of Wahhabi clerics. They
      spent as they wished, becoming patrons of international sexual
      enslavement and the exploitation of children."

      The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be
      espousing Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have
      evolved a version of Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the
      religion, at the expense of helping to understand broader political
      realities. Their manner has encouraged a literal interpretation of
      Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to exploit the Koran
      to justify the killing of innocents.

      Ultimately, the profusion of Rothschild financed petro-dollars in
      the coffers of the Saudi family has made it possible for them to
      propagandize their bastardized version of Islam to other parts of
      the world, most notably to America, where they purportedly subsidize
      up to 80 percent of the mosques in the country, a version of Islam
      that substitutes political awareness for dogmatic insistence on
      ritualistic fanaticism.

      In 1999 King Fahd of Saudi Arabia attended the Bilderberg meeting,
      presumably to discuss his role in furthering the interests of world
      government, along with other such luminaries as Yasser Arafat and
      the Pope. Evidently, the Saudi family are part of the deceptive
      ploys of the Illuminati network. Their complicity in the
      accumulation of petro-dollars has gone into the financing of global
      terrorism, from Afghanistan to Bosnia, merely for the purpose of
      fomenting the necessary animosity of the world against Islam.


      David Livingstone is the author of The Dying God: The Hidden History
      of Western Civilization.


      Note added by Peter Meyer, 2005-02-13 CE: There are some who
      vigorously dispute the author's statement in the article above that
      the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam was created by the British (in order to
      divide and conquer). The Ahmadiyya Movement today has many members,
      mostly in Pakistan, but many also in the UK and some in Israel. One
      Ahmadi wrote to say that David Livingstone's allegation is refuted
      by the author of the article Ahmadiyyat and the British. As with all
      controversial issues discussed or mentioned on this website the
      interested reader must make the effort to inform himself so as to
      come to a sound conclusion. A web search on "Mirza Ghulam Ahmad"
      or "Ahmadiyya Movement" will bring up plenty of websites, pro- and
      anti-. We note, however, the interesting comment at Qadiyanism: A
      Brief Survey that "Qadiyanis ... established good liaison with the
      State of Israel immediately after its establishment and Israel gave
      them full protection" (whatever that means). On this matter, see the
      contradictory claims of Ahmadis in Israel and Ahmadis and the State
      of Israel. Clearly the disputes involving the Ahmadis are complex.
      These pro- and anti-Ahmadiyya disputes actually remind one of the
      original purpose of Wahhabi'ism: to sow discord among Muslims and to
      bring Islam into disrepute. Same old "divide and conquer" strategy
      in a new guise? Perhaps, though in this case it is unclear who
      exactly is fomenting the discord.

      [NOTE: This article is a good introduction to the problem. However
      the author makes the mistake of lumping all Saudis into one belief
      system. In actuality, Saudi Arabia is in the midst of a civil war
      between sects of Wahhabis: pro-US ruling class and anti-US renegade
      sons. The Saudi military includes many Palestinian refugees. Saudi
      Arabia is an ethnic Arab nation state. Philosophically, Wahhabi vs.
      Sufi is like Protestant vs. Catholic. Al-Wahhab was against
      mysticism, against saint-veneration, against graven images, against
      frivolity. It was originally a reform movement within Islam.

      American Islam is for the most part Wahhabi in the Protestant sense.
      They do not fixate on any one political ideology although they tend
      to be very in love with the American constitution. My observation is
      that they are a group of people who are very excited about the idea
      of democracy, especially if it can be practiced in a way that
      expresses their cultural identity [for example they are anti-
      abortion]. Since they come from countries with authoritarian regimes
      where seriously practicing Muslims are tortured in the dungeons of
      the king, this concept of learning how to have Town Meetings,
      learning how to communicate with other ethnic groups so that people
      will respect and listen to you, how to agree and disagree
      appropriately, etc. are in some ways new experiences that they have
      to struggle to learn within the context of being American
      immigrants. They have the tradition of the "shura" to fall back on,
      which is the practice of mutual consultation within the mosque. The
      closest thing Americans have to shura is called a "cooperative." The
      mosque has always been the stronghold of resistance against
      authoritarian regimes. This is where free speech is practiced. That
      is why the Saudi regime writes pre-approved sermons every Friday and
      the Islamic leader (imam) is forced to read the "official sermon" or
      go to prison. -WVNS]]



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.