Globalists Created Wahhabi Terrorism
- Four militants killed in shootout in S. Arabia
RIYADH, Jan 9: Four wanted militants were killed on Sunday in a
shootout with security forces in a desert area in Saudi Arabia,
where the government is battling a wave of attacks by Al Qaeda
linked militants, the interior ministry said.
The gunfight resulted in "the death of four... members of the
deviant group," a term used to describe Al Qaeda sympathizers, a
ministry spokesman said in a statement carried by SPA news
Globalists Created Wahhabi Terrorism to Destroy Islam and Justify a
by David Livingstone
The 'House' of Saud no more Islamic than Billy Graham
Following the dictates of Hegelian dialectic, the Globalists have
created two antagonizing forces, the "Liberal-Democratic" West,
against Terrorism, or "political Islam", to force us into the
acceptance of their final alternative, a New World Order.
The West and Islam have had a long era of compatibility, but this
history has been denied to foster the myth of a "Clash of
Civilizations". In order to inflame the sentiments of the West
against Islam, our attention has been focused on the specter of
fanatical Wahhabism, and more specifically, its most notorious
exponent, Osama bin Laden.
However, as outlined in an excellent article by Peter Goodgame, The
Globalists and the Islamists, the Globalists have had a hand in
shaping and financing all the terrorist organizations of the
twentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, Hamas
of Palestine and the Afghan Mujahideen. But the history of their
duplicity dates farther back still, to the 18th Century, when
British Freemasons created the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia itself,
to further their imperialistic objectives.
That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for
shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a
Turkish work, Mir'at al-Haramain, by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-
1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of
deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with
the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century.
The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known
document by the name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in
series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel, and later in a
prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to
the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English
and other languages.
The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for
his government, which sent him to the Middle East to discover ways
to undermine the Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to
promote were racism and nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication
and tempting Muslim women to uncover themselves.
But most important was the strategy to "insert heresies into
Muslims' creedal tenets and then criticize Islam for being a
religion of terror." To this purpose, Hempher located a particularly
corrupt individual by the name of Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab.
To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it
is first necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims,
regardless of their race or nationality, to see themselves as
brothers in faith. The killing of another Muslim was strictly
However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the
British hoped to pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish
brothers. The only way to do so was to find a loophole in Islamic
law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as apostates.
Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to
insinuate this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula.
Basically, Wahhab contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act
of offering prayers to saints, their Turkish brethren had forfeited
their faith, and therefore, that it was permitted to kill all who
refused to adhere to his reforms, and to enslave their women and
children. But that included the entire Muslim world, except for his
small misguided band of followers.
But the Wahabbi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of
the Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from
Jewish merchants from Iraq. Orthodox jurists of the time branded the
Wahhabis as heretics and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance.
Nevertheless, the Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for
their pretended faith by indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and
non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then set about destroying all the
holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the Prophet's treasure,
which included holy books, works of art and innumerable priceless
gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The
leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had
destroyed were used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals.
The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in
1818, but the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal
I. The movement was then somewhat restored until once again
destroyed at the end of the nineteenth century.
After WWI, the former regions of the Ottoman Empire were divided
into varying puppets regimes. For aiding to undermine the Ottoman
authority in the region, Ibn Saud was duly rewarded with the
creation of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 1932. One year later, in
1933, the Saudis granted oil concessions to California Arabian
Standard Oil Company (Casoc), affiliate of Standard Oil of
California (Socal, today's Chevron), headed by Rothschild agent, and
chief among [US] Illuminati families, Rockefeller. Since that time,
Saudi Arabia has been the most important ally to the West in the
Middle East, not only providing ready access to its plentiful oil
reserves, but also in tempering Arab aggression against Israel. Due
to the evident hypocrisy of the regime, it has been necessary to
suppress the ensuing dissent with brutality. Another important
aspect has been preventing scholars from speaking of "politics",
that is, to criticize the regime.
In The Two Faces of Islam, Stephen Schwartz writes, "Their tastes
led them to taverns, casinos, brothels ... They bought fleets of
automobiles, private jets, and yachts the size of warships. They
invested in valuable Western art they did not understand or like and
which often offended the sensitivities of Wahhabi clerics. They
spent as they wished, becoming patrons of international sexual
enslavement and the exploitation of children."
The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be
espousing Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have
evolved a version of Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the
religion, at the expense of helping to understand broader political
realities. Their manner has encouraged a literal interpretation of
Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to exploit the Koran
to justify the killing of innocents.
Ultimately, the profusion of Rothschild financed petro-dollars in
the coffers of the Saudi family has made it possible for them to
propagandize their bastardized version of Islam to other parts of
the world, most notably to America, where they purportedly subsidize
up to 80 percent of the mosques in the country, a version of Islam
that substitutes political awareness for dogmatic insistence on
In 1999 King Fahd of Saudi Arabia attended the Bilderberg meeting,
presumably to discuss his role in furthering the interests of world
government, along with other such luminaries as Yasser Arafat and
the Pope. Evidently, the Saudi family are part of the deceptive
ploys of the Illuminati network. Their complicity in the
accumulation of petro-dollars has gone into the financing of global
terrorism, from Afghanistan to Bosnia, merely for the purpose of
fomenting the necessary animosity of the world against Islam.
David Livingstone is the author of The Dying God: The Hidden History
of Western Civilization.
Note added by Peter Meyer, 2005-02-13 CE: There are some who
vigorously dispute the author's statement in the article above that
the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam was created by the British (in order to
divide and conquer). The Ahmadiyya Movement today has many members,
mostly in Pakistan, but many also in the UK and some in Israel. One
Ahmadi wrote to say that David Livingstone's allegation is refuted
by the author of the article Ahmadiyyat and the British. As with all
controversial issues discussed or mentioned on this website the
interested reader must make the effort to inform himself so as to
come to a sound conclusion. A web search on "Mirza Ghulam Ahmad"
or "Ahmadiyya Movement" will bring up plenty of websites, pro- and
anti-. We note, however, the interesting comment at Qadiyanism: A
Brief Survey that "Qadiyanis ... established good liaison with the
State of Israel immediately after its establishment and Israel gave
them full protection" (whatever that means). On this matter, see the
contradictory claims of Ahmadis in Israel and Ahmadis and the State
of Israel. Clearly the disputes involving the Ahmadis are complex.
These pro- and anti-Ahmadiyya disputes actually remind one of the
original purpose of Wahhabi'ism: to sow discord among Muslims and to
bring Islam into disrepute. Same old "divide and conquer" strategy
in a new guise? Perhaps, though in this case it is unclear who
exactly is fomenting the discord.
[NOTE: This article is a good introduction to the problem. However
the author makes the mistake of lumping all Saudis into one belief
system. In actuality, Saudi Arabia is in the midst of a civil war
between sects of Wahhabis: pro-US ruling class and anti-US renegade
sons. The Saudi military includes many Palestinian refugees. Saudi
Arabia is an ethnic Arab nation state. Philosophically, Wahhabi vs.
Sufi is like Protestant vs. Catholic. Al-Wahhab was against
mysticism, against saint-veneration, against graven images, against
frivolity. It was originally a reform movement within Islam.
American Islam is for the most part Wahhabi in the Protestant sense.
They do not fixate on any one political ideology although they tend
to be very in love with the American constitution. My observation is
that they are a group of people who are very excited about the idea
of democracy, especially if it can be practiced in a way that
expresses their cultural identity [for example they are anti-
abortion]. Since they come from countries with authoritarian regimes
where seriously practicing Muslims are tortured in the dungeons of
the king, this concept of learning how to have Town Meetings,
learning how to communicate with other ethnic groups so that people
will respect and listen to you, how to agree and disagree
appropriately, etc. are in some ways new experiences that they have
to struggle to learn within the context of being American
immigrants. They have the tradition of the "shura" to fall back on,
which is the practice of mutual consultation within the mosque. The
closest thing Americans have to shura is called a "cooperative." The
mosque has always been the stronghold of resistance against
authoritarian regimes. This is where free speech is practiced. That
is why the Saudi regime writes pre-approved sermons every Friday and
the Islamic leader (imam) is forced to read the "official sermon" or
go to prison. -WVNS]]
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW