Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Uri Avnery: Skin of the Bear:

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Sunday, July 25 2004 @ 07:54 AM EDT Paradoxically, the Palestinian factions, of all people, seem to believe Sharon s announcement about his intention to leave
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 1, 2004
      Sunday, July 25 2004 @ 07:54 AM EDT

      "Paradoxically, the Palestinian factions, of all people, seem to
      believe Sharon's announcement about his intention to leave Gaza .."

      By Uri Avnery
      The Palestine Chronicle

      I am writing this with an aching heart. I have postponed writing it as
      long as I could.

      In Jewish tradition, there is a searing phrase: "The Temple was not
      destroyed but for gratuitous hatred." It sums up the events in
      beleaguered Jerusalem, in the year 70 AD, when the town was surrounded
      by the Roman legions. While Titus' soldiers were maintaining the siege
      and the population was beginning to starve, inside the town ferocious
      battles took place between various factions of zealots, who killed
      each other and burnt each other's last stores of wheat.

      Something like this is now taking place in the Palestinian
      territories. While the occupation forces are tightening the siege and
      carrying out "targeted killings", battles between the Palestinians
      themselves have broken out, with militants shooting at each other,
      targeting leaders and burning headquarters.

      Occupation generals, politicians and commentators in Israel follow the
      events with glee or click their tongues sanctimoniously: "Didn't we
      tell you? The Palestinians can't rule themselves, there is no one to
      talk with, we have no partner for peace. When they are left to
      themselves, anarchy reigns." On many Israeli tongues the Greek word
      "chaos" (pronounced with an American accent) was rolling.

      Since the Sharon government is responsible for the present situation
      in Gaza in the first place, it resembles the son who kills both his
      parents and pleads in court: "Have mercy! I am an orphan!"

      Paradoxically, the Palestinian factions, of all people, seem to
      believe Sharon's announcement about his intention to leave Gaza. What
      is happening there is, first of all, a fight about the skin of the
      bear that has not yet been caught.

      Everybody talks about "reforms", a word dear to the Americans, but the
      battle is about power and control.

      Muhammad Dahlan's faction hopes to take possession of the Gaza Strip
      before Sharon's promised withdrawal. Sharon's people are open about
      their preference for this group. The Americans support them in order
      to suit Sharon, and the Egyptians support them to please the Americans.

      The rival faction supports Mussa Arafat who was sent by his relative,
      Yasser Arafat, to control the security apparatus. He may not be the
      most popular appointee, but the leader in far-away Ramallah appointed
      his most trusted lieutenant in order to fend off the danger he fears
      most: that the Gaza Strip will cut itself off from the West Bank and
      become a kind of autonomous Bantustan under Israeli-American-Egyptian

      This is what is happening on the surface. But the events also have
      deeper roots in the present Palestinian situation, which consists of
      an existential contradiction.

      On the one side, the Palestinian war of liberation is far from over.
      It is at its height. It can well be said that never has the very
      existence of the Palestinians – both as a nation and as individuals –
      been in greater danger than now.

      On the other hand, on the West Bank and in the Gaza Strip there has
      come into being a kind of mini-state that requires a state-like
      administration: security, economy, education, justice, welfare and so on.

      The surreal situation in Gaza reflects this contradiction: while Mussa
      Arafat, Muhammad Dahlan and the other Fatah leaders fight each other
      for control of the Palestinian Authority and its security organs, a
      brutal war is going on between the occupation forces and the Tanzim,
      Hamas and Jihad militants.

      The leader of the Palestinian war of liberation is Yasser Arafat.
      Among the Palestinians, no one contests that. He is the only person
      able to safeguard the unity of the Palestinian people. He is the only
      leader with a wide strategic grasp of all the geographic and
      functional aspects of the dispersed Palestinian people. He has the
      attributes necessary for a leader in such a situation: an uncontested
      personal authority, physical courage, the ability to make decisions
      and a talent for manoeuver. Palestinians call him the `Father of the
      Nation" and compare him with George Washington, David Ben-Gurion and
      Nelson Mandela.

      The criticism of Arafat, prevalent mostly among the intellectual and
      political elite - concerns his functioning as the chief of the
      "mini-state". Unlike the Prime Minister of Israel, Arafat is not
      suspected of personal corruption. He is being blamed for the fact that
      the Palestinian Authority is too much like the other Arab regimes,
      suffering from concentration of power, proliferation of security
      apparatuses, corruption, cronyism and the undue influence of big families.

      As a Palestinian member of parliament told me recently: "Arafat leads
      the national struggle, and all of us support him. But he neglects the
      domestic order, and against that we protest."

      However, Sharon is not fighting against Arafat to encourage him to
      delegate power or because he has seven different security formations
      (the United States has 15 intelligence agencies, four military
      services and an untold number of police organizations.) He is fighting
      against Arafat because his elimination will cause the disintegration
      of the Palestinian nation into splinters and thus clear the way for
      ethnic cleansing. Arafat is very much aware of this danger and, in
      comparison, all the diseases of the Palestinian Authority seem to him

      The strategy of Sharon and his generals is simple and brutal: to
      destroy the Palestinian Authority, turn life in the occupied
      territories into hell, disintegrate Palestinian society and drive the
      survivors from the country, not in one dramatic sweep (as in 1948) but
      in a slow, continuous, creeping process.

      Up to now, this has not succeeded. In spite of inhuman conditions, the
      Palestinian society has held on in a manner that arouses wonderment.
      The events of the last few weeks look to Sharon and the army chiefs
      like signs of collapse. I believe they are wrong and that the
      Palestinian society will draw back from the abyss.

      It is reasonable to expect that the prisoner in the Mukata'ah, who has
      already led his people out from so many existential crises, will do so
      again. I sincerely hope so, because Arafat is the only person who can
      make peace with us. We will know no peace, as long as our neighbors do



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.