Much Ado about Helen Thomas
- These guys are always purple in the face because of indignation or is it constipation?
Much Ado about Helen Thomas
By Israel Shamir and Paul Bennet
Every second headline with the word "Jews" in it also has the word "Outraged". In 0.27 seconds the Google search engine discovered 8,230,000 hits for the search term "outraged Jews". That's fifty times the number of "outraged Frenchmen" per head. The reasons for the Jewish outrage are all over the globe, although the French tend to be outraged closer to home. The Frenchman was outraged because of a photo of a man wiping his butt on the flag of France, while a Jew is outraged after a Vatican priest compared Church troubles with the patented Jewish variety. The sheer number of outraged Jews in headlines is overwhelming. They express outrage over the Turk who said "fuck you" to Israeli demands of surrender, and the reporters jot down every word. They cry "outrageous!" when New Zealand bans kosher slaughter, and it becomes archived as an important article on the Mind & Soul of Judaism. A Croat singer tours the outback and the Australian press holds its breath for the inevitable conclusion: Jewish Outrage.
What is it this week? Helen Thomas.
What's so unique about the "outrageous" remarks uttered by the long time White House correspondent? It was the very same week that Jewish Knesset members had ordered the Palestinian Knesset member from Nazareth to "go back to Gaza", and she was granted no outraged headline, no outraged editorials. It's a rare bird who hasn't been told at some point in their lives to "go back" to wherever he or she came from. It is an unpleasant comment to hear, but as insults go it's pretty weak stuff hardly something to get "outraged" about. Our friends and colleagues in the media have minutely analyzed Helen Thomas' off-the-cuff comments and history for evidence of Anti-Semitism, but it was so obviously the type of trivial one-liner that normal people would brush off without thinking twice that the whole "outrageous" manufactured incident has turned into a bit of a joke. Is there reason within the madness of organized Jewish outrage, a powerhouse that has forced even President Obama to get involved? Might not this unique Jewish ability to become outraged be connected with that other Jewish ability, of becoming rich?
Perhaps we are over solicitous to Jewish needs. Perhaps we misread their cries. Indeed, their purple faces might not indicate indignation it might just be acute constipation. Such discomfort would only make sense, considering how anxious is the life of a common swindler. For example, a typical outraged Jew is Mortimer Zuckerman, a billionaire and media mogul whose ferocious outbursts of rage are featured in his own newspapers, as well as in the newspapers of his cronies. He made his money by real estate speculation; his Harvard tricks contributed to the housing crisis that has made many Americans homeless; since then he has moved on to making Palestinians homeless.
Or consider the super-banksters Goldman Sachs, major supporters of ADL-coordinated spasms of outrage, vengeance, and indignation. Guy Rolnik, editor-in-chief of the leading Israeli financial paper The Marker wrote this recipe for gastric disorder (29.4.2010):
"Like Shakespeare's traitors Rosencrantz and Guildenstern, Goldman Sachs is a fortress of smoke and mirrors, of deception and illusion. Goldman's managers enter top levels of the US Administration a huge octopus that was the model for the Hollywood image of a Corporation that embraces and penetrates all levels of government in conspiracy movies The company was established by two Jews from Germany, and a huge majority of its managers in the past and in the present are and were good and surely wealthy Jews. This is to be regretted, for I suspect that one day, when somebody will list stars and players of the great financial disaster 2008' he will end up with a catalogue strikingly similar to the big Manhattan synagogue contributors' register, - or to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion..."
Such Jews are so rich they hire lesser men like Abe Foxman to express outrage for them. And that he does, like clockwork: not a single day passes without being graced by Foxman's indignation. Did these prominent Jews enrich themselves because they love wealth and fame, or can we detect a deep-seated cry for attention? The Jewish genius Dr. Sigmund Freud associated the infantile psychological urges behind such financial prowess with an early reluctance to part with feces. In other words, are these rich Jews simply full of shit?
Indeed there are exceptions. There are generous Jews who easily part with dough for the Palestinian cause and for other good causes. There are nominal Jews who never got enough money to bother, but nobody listens to their indignation if any. And there are guys like me who are just not good at being outraged, though sometimes one should.
When the Jews were poor, in the beginning of 20th century, they never expressed outrage; rather, they had some fun over their misfortunes. Even a severely beaten, nay, dying Jew would reply to a question whether it hurts with the standard "only when I laugh". Too much money had spoiled them: they became too serious and prone to indignation and constipation. Money should come and go, easy and free. Do not accumulate it and avoid even righteous indignation, it is not healthy.
The Talmud tells the story of R. Judah b. Ila'I, who was always purple in the face. A wise woman from Rome declared that a purple face is a sure sign that the man is either a usurer or a pig breeder. He replied to her: "there are 24 toilets between home and my place of study and I try each one along the way." That Roman lady understood that the habits of a man will inevitably register on his face. The ADL, charged with creating professionally-outraged, purple-faced Jews, might be considered a sort of pig farm financed by usurers.
Now that we have discovered this simple physiological explanation for the continuous stream of Jewish indignation, we no longer have to pay it so much attention. The next time Abe Foxman waxes indignant over Helen Thomas' sharp tongue or (God Forbid) accuses you of Anti-Semitism, we might just take him aside and ask him quietly: have you tried an enema for that?
Edited by Paul Bennet
HELEN THOMAS AND A TRUTH TOO HOT TO HANDLE
by Michael Hoffman
June 8, 2010
On May 27, 2010, during the "American Jewish Heritage Month" celebration at the White House, Orthodox Rabbi David Nesenoff (rabbi@...) asked Helen Thomas, dean of the Washington Press corps, if she had any comments on the Israeli state. Thomas replied, "Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine...Remember, these people are occupied, and it's their land; its not German, its not Poland's." She was then asked where the Judaics should go, to which she replied: "they should go home" to "Poland, Germany." Then, after another question she added, "America and everywhere else." The rabbi videotaped her remarks, and his video quickly achieved Internet notoriety with "viral" status.
"Time" magazine scribe Joe Klein termed her views "odious" and said she should no longer have the privilege, accorded by the White House
Correspondents Association, of a front row center seat. Former George W. Bush Press Secretary Ari Fleischer, a neocon architect of the invasion of Iraq, said,"She should lose her job over this. As someone who is Jewish, and as someone who worked with her and used to like her, I find this appalling." On May 30, Thomas was dropped by her speaker's bureau, Nine Speakers. Walt Whitman High School in Bethesda, Maryland canceled Thomas's commencement address.
Thomas apologized for her remarks on June 4. The Anti-Defamation League said the apology did not go far enough. Hearst News corporation, which has employed Thomas as a columnist for the past 10 years, issued a statement announcing her "retirement," which Hearst said, was "effective immediately."
Thomas has been covering the White House for fifty years, since 1960.
She will mark her 90th birthday on Aug. 4. She was often the only White House reporter asking presidents probing questions about American and Israeli wars.
This writer is not aware of whether Helen Thomas has read Shlomo Sand's "The Invention of the Jewish People" or Paul Wexler's "The Ashkenazic Jews: A Slavo-Turkic People in Search of a Jewish Identity." These books deliver a long overdue knockout punch to the laughable hoax that asserts that today's descendants of the Khazars are the direct "Jewish" descendants of the ancient patriarchs Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. Sand and Wexler document that the home of the Khazar impostor "Jews" is indeed, as Thomas implied, in eastern Europe, not Palestine.
Perhaps Miss Thomas was offering only a woman's intuition, that the
"Jews" of "Israel" are neither; that they have more in common with the Yiddish shetls of eastern Europe than the Biblical land of the Middle East. In either case, in America, candor --when it touches on myths sacred to the ruling class -- is simply not permitted to the working guy or gal. The latter-days Diogenes will quickly be out of a job. Under American capitalism you have freedom of speech as long as you don't care about eating.
Helen Thomas, a crusader for peace and an investigative journalist who refused to rubberstamp Bush's ghastly war in Iraq, as did the entire White House Press corps on March 6, 2003, as documented by Bill Moyers (http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/btw/transcript1.html), is now fodder for pompous discursive lectures on the venality of the goyim camouflaged as human rights lessons, by the likes of columnist Richard Cohen (cohenr@...).
In "What Helen Thomas missed," (Washington Post, June 8, 2010, p. A17), Mr. Cohen views the controversy as an opportunity to libel, from his lofty moral perch, Polish gentiles as thieves, murderers and haters, and General George Patton as an evil "bigot":
"Ah, another teachable moment! This one comes to us from Helen Thomas, the longtime White House reporter and columnist who announced her retirement on Monday. Thomas, of Lebanese ancestry and almost 90, has never been shy about her anti-Israel views, for which, as far as I'm concerned, she is wrong and to which she is entitled. Then the other day, she performed a notable public service by revealing how very little she knew. Asked at a White House event if she had any comments about Israel, Thomas said, 'Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine. . . . Go home. Poland. Germany. And America and everywhere else.'
"Well, I don't know about 'everywhere else,' but after World War II,
many Jews did attempt to 'go home' to Poland. This resulted in the
murder of about 1,500 of them -- killed not by Nazis but by Poles,
either out of sheer ethnic hatred or fear they would lose their (stolen) homes.
"The mini-Holocaust that followed the Holocaust itself is not well-known anymore, but it played an outsize role in the establishment of the state of Israel. It was the plight of Jews consigned to Displaced Persons camps in Europe that both moved and outraged President Harry Truman, who supported Jewish immigration to Palestine and, when the time came, the new state itself.
"Something had to be done for the Jews of Europe. They were still being murdered. In the Polish city of Kielce, on July 4, 1946 -- more than a year after the end of the war -- rumors of a Jewish ritual murder triggered a pogrom in which 42 Jewish Holocaust survivors were killed. The Kielce murders were not, by any means, the sole example of why Jews could not 'go home.' When I visited the Polish city where my mother had been born, Ostroleka, I was told of a Jew who survived Auschwitz only to be murdered when he tried to reclaim his business. In much of Eastern Europe, Jews feared for their lives...
"For that reason, those who had struck out for home soon returned to DP camps and the safety of -- irony of ironies -- Germany. Some of the camps were under the command of Gen. George S. Patton, a great man on the screen, a contemptible bigot in real life....For the surviving Jews of Eastern Europe, there was no going home -- and no staying, either. Europe was hostile to them, not in the least appalled or sorry about what had just happened. Even the American military, in the person of the hideous Patton, seemed hostile... For most of the DPs, America was also out of the question. The United States, in the grip of feverish anti-communism and already unreceptive to immigrants, maintained a tight quota. When the Jewish DPs were polled, an overwhelming majority said they wanted to go to Palestine. They knew life would be tough there, but they would be among their own people -- and relatively safe" (end quote)
Richard Cohen, the mainstream media's fount of moral history, has penned hate speech/group libel disguised as "a teachable moment." Hundreds of other Talmudic supremacists in the media and academia are engaged in the same relentless offensive -- spreading contempt and instilling guilt in the goyim -- entire nations such as "feverish anti-communist" America, or "thieving" Poland where Poles irrationally attack Judaic people because of: "sheer ethnic hatred," "fear they would lose their (stolen) homes" (most of Poland must have been once owned by Judaics) or, that old reliable standby, "rumors of a Jewish ritual murder."
The reader is supposed to sit at the feet of Cohen in wide-eyed awe as this righteous Zionist savant spews his hatred for east European
gentiles and heroes like George Patton. The only good goy in Cohen's
column is 33rd degree Freemason Harry Truman, the president who heated Hiroshima and Nagasaki to several thousand degrees of hell.
Does Mr. Cohen himself exhibit any "sheer ethnic hatred" for Polish
Catholics? Was it really a case of Poles rising against some Judaic
people only due to "rumors" and "hatred," or has Mr. Cohen suppressed
the other half of the story? What is the real history behind the alleged "mini-holocaust" in Kielce in 1946?
According to Judaic author John Sack, "In 1945 many Poles felt (and not without reason) that Jews ran the Office of State Security...the chief of the Office was Jacob Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department heads were Jews."
Sack reported that 75% of the officers of the Communist Secret Police in Silesia were Judiacs ("Jews"). He noted that many Judaics in the
Communist terror apparatus in Poland changed their names to Polish ones, such as General Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski, Capt. Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. Sack, "The New Republic," Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6).
According to Sheldon Kirshner, writing in the "Canadian Jewish News,"
Nov. 5, 1992, p. 16: In Poland, "...a disproportionate number of
Communists were Jews. In 1930, at its peak, 35% of the members of the
party were Jewish. In Communist youth organizations, Jewish membership was even higher, while Communists of Jewish origin occupied most of the seats on the central committee. Communism appealed to some Jews because it opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than any other Polish party...Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years immediately after World War Two, when the party leadership was totally in the hands of the prewar Communist leadership that abhorred anti-Semitism" (end quote).
The mass murder of Polish Catholics at the hands of Judaic Communists is almost never raised. Instead, the attack on Judaics by Polish peasants enraged at the role of Judaics in Communist terror, which occurred at Kielce, will be the focus. The Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal August Hlond (1881-1948), declared that the attack in Kielce occurred because of resentment "due to the Jews who today occupy leading positions in Poland's (Communist) government and endeavor to introduce a governmental structure that the majority of Poles do not wish to have." (Ibid., Kirshner).
As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observed, "The average Pole could not but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the country--Berman and Minc--were both Jewish as was the dreaded security official Rozanski." ("New York Review of Books," Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).
Solomon Morel was commandant of a post-war Communist concentration camp for Germans in Poland. Stalin deliberately put Judaics in charge of such camps. In Poland Morel tortured and murdered thousands of Germans, sometimes with his bare hands (cf. "The Wrath of Solomon," in "The Village Voice," March 30, 1993). Morel found safe haven in the Israeli state, which refused requests to extradite him to stand trial for war crimes in Poland. Sack recounts the facts in his important book, "An Eye for an Eye."
You left out the rest of the story, Mr. Cohen. It's called context.
Helen Thomas uttered truths too hot to handle for our supposed "anything goes" culture. Her fate will be familiar to all Americans who have dared to contradict sanctified Zionist mythology.
MICHAEL HOFFMAN is the editor of "Revisionist History" newsletter and
the author of the massive reference work, "Judaism Discovered."
Hoffman's independent scholarship is supported by donations and the sale of his books, pamphlets, newsletters, recorded lectures and documentary films. http://revisionisthistorystore.blogspot.com
God Bless Helen Thomas
As everyone knows, Helen Thomas, the doyenne of the Washington Press Corps, has gone into retirement after making some heretical remarks about Israel and Israelis. The current wikipedia entry reads in part as follows:
"On May 27, 2010, outside a White House Jewish heritage event, Rabbi David Nesenoff asked if Thomas had any comments on Israel. Thomas replied, "Tell them to get the hell out of Palestine... Remember, these people are occupied, and it's their land." She was then asked where the Israelis should go, to which she replied: "they should go home" to "Poland, Germany,... America and everywhere else." Thomas subsequently issued an apology on her personal web site: "I deeply regret my comments I made last week regarding the Israelis and the Palestinians. They do not reflect my heart-felt belief that peace will come to the Middle East only when all parties recognize the need for mutual respect and tolerance. May that day come soon."
She was perhaps the last representative of a proud tradition of American journalism, of calling it like you see it and damn the torpedoes - in a word, of telling the truth. Presidents have either trusted or feared her, depending on their own proclivities for truth telling, hardly a hallmark of politicians of whatever rank. There she always was, up front and center due to her rank as America's premier representative of the press, ready to ask that one piercing question directed at whatever cover-up, hypocrisy or skullduggery the DC suits were up to at the moment. The most recent example was her pointed question to President Obama, asking President Obama to name all the countries in the Middle East that have nuclear weapons, which was avoided by the President, who claimed to not want to "speculate". Thomas claims that knowledge of Israeli nukes is very public in DC and Obama's answer shows a lack of credibility. She explains the importance of this question for U.S. policy in the region. Finally, she confides that she has not been called on by the President since that day, but that if she does, she will ask him whether or not he has found any more information about nukes in the Middle East since their last encounter.
In preparation for my bar-mitzvah I attended Hebrew School at a place called Temple Emeth in Brookline, MA. Emeth is Hebrew for truth, and I was young enough, 11-12, to be curious what that meant. What I mostly discovered was an ancient cult dedicated to telling old wives tales meant to frighten and cajole its adherents into becoming and remaining loyal members of the tribe. The "truth" indeed. But I do remember that some of the old texts frequently mentioned something called "righteousness," which was somehow supposed to be the bedrock of the whole thing. Of course, no one actually believed in God. The "enlightened" Jews of Europe threw out that retro concept generations ago. Their new faith was Zionism, which can be summed up with the words, "God does not exist, but he gave us the Land." In replacing the old faith with the new, that old notion of "righteousness" conveniently disappeared - the baby got thrown out with the bathwater. What did remain was the actual faith of the Pharisees going back to biblical times, the worship of the Golden Calf, the belief in and absolute devotion to money and power.
She has seen it all, and if there's anyone who knows what the truth is, it is Helen Thomas. She saw the pressure and treachery applied by the Zionist mafia that led to the birth of Israel as an American protectorate in the Middle East. She saw her country that she so loved fall prey to a ruthless fifth column that has turned America into an obedient puppet of what a French diplomat once called "that shitty little state." She watched as the Chicago Jewish political mafia picked out and groomed a nobody for the Presidency, the perfect Uncle Tom with a silken tongue who would smoothly carry out Massa's orders
Who knows what the "rabbi" said to set her off, but whatever it was, she could no longer contain what she (and hundreds of millions of others who have not been duped or seduced by the Zionist) have felt all along, so she said what is so obvious - a bunch of genocidal settler-colonialist Eastern European fascists have no business being in Palestine in any other capacity than as tourists and should just get the hell out.
God bless Helen Thomas.
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
To leave this list, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Please consider contributing to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@... !