Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

2 Brits rendered to Bagram

Expand Messages
  • World View
    Britain Acknowledges 2 Detainees Are in U.S. Prison in Afghanistan By Karen DeYoung and Del Quentin Wilber Washington Post http://freedetainees.org/4295 The
    Message 1 of 1 , Mar 1, 2009
      Britain Acknowledges 2 Detainees Are in U.S. Prison in Afghanistan
      By Karen DeYoung and Del Quentin Wilber
      Washington Post

      The British government, after years of denying it had any role in the
      U.S. policy of "extraordinary rendition," acknowledged yesterday that
      two prisoners its military forces turned over to U.S. custody in Iraq
      five years ago were subsequently sent to a U.S. prison in Afghanistan.

      In a statement to Parliament, Defense Secretary John Hutton
      apologized for what he said was "inaccurate information . . . given
      to the House by my department" on previous occasions. The transfer,
      he said, was unknown to his predecessor and came to his attention
      only in December during an internal investigation in response to
      parliamentary questions.

      Hutton said that the rendition involving two Pakistani men, who have
      been in custody at Bagram air base in Afghanistan since 2004,
      violated a U.S.-British memorandum of understanding specifying
      that "no person captured with assistance" from British forces "will
      be removed from the territory of Iraq without prior consultation."

      The Pentagon quickly took responsibility for the lapse. "There was a
      level of formal coordination that should have taken place with
      respect to a transfer of this nature," spokesman Bryan Whitman
      said. "Unfortunately, that did not occur in this case. It was an

      Revelations about the previously unknown renditions brought immediate
      criticism in Britain from political opposition and human rights
      groups and are likely to complicate the Obama administration's
      efforts to persuade European and other governments to accept
      prisoners released from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

      President Obama last month issued an executive order to close the
      Guantanamo facility within a year and began a case-by-case review of
      all 245 prisoners there. But concerns have been raised in this
      country and abroad that similar reviews and rights have not been
      accorded prisoners detained at Bagram — where the United States
      maintains a large prison and is currently building a massive new
      facility — and that some Guantanamo detainees may be transferred

      About 650 prisoners are currently being held at Bagram, at least 20
      of whom — including the two Pakistanis — are believed to be non-
      Afghans captured outside the Afghan war zone.

      Last week, the administration, in a one-paragraph filing in U.S.
      District Court in Washington, said it would continue the Bush
      administration's policy of not granting to Bagram detainees the
      rights that Guantanamo prisoners won in federal courts to challenge
      their confinement.

      Guantanamo detainees won habeas corpus rights in a landmark Supreme
      Court ruling in June, but its provisions were limited to those held
      in Cuba. At a hearing before U.S. District Judge John D. Bates held
      shortly before Obama's inauguration, four Bagram detainees argued
      that they should have the same rights as those held in Guantanamo. A
      Justice Department attorney argued that they did not have the right
      to challenge their confinement because they were "unlawful enemy
      combatants" being held in a war zone "half a world away."

      Bates said it was "anomalous" for the government to say that those
      it "chooses to send to Guantanamo have habeas rights, but those who
      the government chooses to send to Bagram don't have habeas rights."
      His ruling is still pending, but shortly after Obama took office,
      Bates asked the government if it wanted to "refine" its position. In
      its reply Friday, the Justice Department said that it "adheres to its
      previously articulated position."

      The two Pakistanis in the British announcement were not named.
      Hutton's statement said he was told by the United States that the two
      were members of Lashkar-i-Taiba, a Pakistani extremist group with
      ties to al-Qaeda. It also said that "the U.S. government has
      explained to us that they were moved to Afghanistan because of a lack
      of relevant linguists necessary to interrogate them effectively in


      "We have been assured," Hutton said, "that the detainees are held in
      a humane, safe and secure environment meeting international
      standards" and that the International Committee of the Red Cross has
      had regular access to them.

      Correspondent Kevin Sullivan in London and staff researcher Julie
      Tate contributed to this report.



      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:


      Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
      Please consider donating to WVNS today.
      Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.

      To leave this list, send an email to:
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.