Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

FIRST LEGAL CHALLENGE TO PATRIOT ACT

Expand Messages
  • ummyakoub
    CIVIL LIBERTIES AND ARAB GROUPS CHALLENGE PATRIOT ACT SURVEILLANCE Associated Press, 7/30/03 The American Civil Liberties Union and several Arab-American
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 2, 2003
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      CIVIL LIBERTIES AND ARAB GROUPS CHALLENGE PATRIOT ACT SURVEILLANCE
      Associated Press, 7/30/03

      The American Civil Liberties Union and several Arab-American groups
      are mounting a legal challenge to parts of the USA Patriot Act that
      let authorities monitor books people read and carry out secret
      searches.

      The ACLU's Michigan office on Wednesday announced what it called "the
      first-ever direct constitutional challenge to the USA Patriot Act,"
      filing a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Detroit.

      "Ordinary Americans should not have to worry that the FBI is rifling
      through their medical records, seizing their personal papers, or
      forcing charities and advocacy groups to divulge membership lists,"
      said Ann Beeson, lead attorney in the lawsuit...

      The group asked the justices to consider when the government should
      be allowed to monitor telephone conversations and e-mail, then use
      the information to prosecute the monitored personÂ…

      Some of the groups participating in the lawsuit are the Washington,
      D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Muslim
      Community Association of Ann Arbor, Bridge Refugee and Sponsorship
      Services in Knoxville, Tenn., and The Islamic Center of Portland.

      The provisions being targeted allow the federal government wider
      latitude than in the past to seize records, books and papers in
      investigations of international terrorism, the ACLU says.

      "People are worried about their privacy, and when they check out
      books, they want to feel safe," Haaris Ahmad, executive director of
      the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Michigan, told The
      Detroit News. "In a free society, people have freedom of thought..."

      ------------------------------------------
      In the Name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

      FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

      CAIR JOINS FIRST LEGAL CHALLENGE TO PATRIOT ACT

      (WASHINGTON, D.C., 7/30/2003) - The Council on American-Islamic
      Relations (CAIR) today joined five other advocacy and community
      groups in mounting a constitutional challenge to the section of the
      USA Patriot Act that vastly expands the FBI's power to spy on
      ordinary people living in the United States. The lawsuit, litigated
      by the ACLU, names Attorney General John Ashcroft and FBI Director
      Robert Mueller as the defendants.

      At a news conference this morning in Detroit, Mich., representatives
      of the ACLU and the plaintiffs outlined why they believe Section 215
      of the USA Patriot Act is unconstitutional.

      SEE: http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=13249&c=206

      * Under Section 215, the FBI has virtually unlimited power to
      secretly obtain a variety of information about ordinary Americans,
      including medical records, reading habits, religious affiliations,
      and Internet surfing.

      * Section 215 allows the FBI to obtain records and personal
      belongings without having to show "probable cause" or any reason to
      believe that there has been any wrongdoing.

      * A gag order in the law prevents those served with Section 215
      orders from telling anyone that the FBI demanded information, even if
      the information poses no risk to national security.

      * There is no limit to the kinds of information the FBI can get under
      Section 215.

      * Judicial oversight of these new powers is extremely limited. The
      government must merely assert that such a search meets the statute's
      broad criteria.

      "We stand firmly in support of our nation's security," said CAIR
      Board Chairman Omar Ahmad. "Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act does
      not enhance that security, but instead violates the privacy rights of
      all Americans and creates a legal cover for intrusive investigations
      of people who are not suspected of planning or carrying out criminal
      acts. The abuses inherent in this legislation are also unnecessary
      because the government already had the power to investigate criminal
      activity."

      Ahmad noted that many libraries nationwide have reacted to Section
      215 by shredding documents and notifying patrons that their records
      are at risk.

      Along with filing the lawsuit, the ACLU is releasing a new
      report, "Unpatriotic Acts: The FBI's Power to Rifle Through Your
      Records and Personal Belongings Without Telling You," which describes
      how Section 215 violates the Constitution.

      SEE: http://www.aclu.org/SafeandFree/SafeandFree.cfm?ID=13246&c=206

      Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include CAIR, American-Arab-Anti-
      Discrimination Committee (ADC), Muslim Community Association of Ann
      Arbor (MCA), Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services
      (ACCESS), Bridge Refugee and Sponsorship Services, and the Islamic
      Center of Portland, Masjed As-Saber.

      - END -

      CONTACT: Ibrahim Hooper, 202-488-8787 or 202-744-7726, E-Mail:
      cair@...; Rabiah Ahmed, 202-488-8787 or 202-439-1441, E-
      Mail: rahmed@...


      *********************************************************************

      NEWS AND VIEWS DISTRIBUTED HERE ARE THE AUTHOR'S RESPONSIBILITY
      AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE OPINION OF WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE

      To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
      vwns-subscribe@yahoogroups.com

      NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/vwns/
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.