8414WE Must Watch and PUBLISH Iowa Count!
- Dec 31, 2007Reporter Chris Bollyn Proves Why WE Must Watch and PUBLISH Iowa Count!
This article focusus on the DEMOCRATIC PARTY process in 2004, which
probably explains how John Kerry went from no where to "winner" in the
Iowa Caucus that year.
Bollyn's article is shocking, and he and his family are now in hiding
outside the USA after being tasered for no reason by two Homeland
Security-trained plain clothes policemen in Hoffman Estates, Illinois
(near Chicago) in 2006. Also see Bollyn's article, "How a Private
Company Counts our Votes on Election Night" linked on the home page of
votefraud.org in the lower left hand blue box.
THIS excellent reporting underscores why all Iowans and NH voters must
support Watch the Vote 2008 and the newly up tally board at:
www.LibertyBroadcastNetwork.org -- In-home correspondents will be
listed for each county in Iowa. Now all we need is for the Iowa Caucus
goers to do one more thing before they go home on Jan 3, Iowa Caucus
nite: make a cell phone call to the in-home correspondent assigned to
your county at www.LibertyBroadcastNetwork.org -- and report the
eye-witness results you saw at your caucus. This is how to checkmate
any chicanery in the GOP Iowa Caucus (or the Democratic).
(The list of in-home correspondents assigned to your county should be
up anytime on LibertyBroadcastNetwork.org. There will also be an open
nationwide conference call on Iowa Caucus nite so people can call in
and ask questions anytime throughout the nite if there is any
uncertainly on what to do or who to call on the actual Caucus nite.)
It is important to note that LibertyBroadcastNetwork.org has set up a
system that goes live IMMEDIATELY on the internet, with updated
tallies. The plan announced by Ron Paul HQ in Iowa appear useless, as
Drew Ivers and the other decision makers there are planning to keep
the tally secret. Without going public -- what keeps the Iowa GOP and
the Big TV Network consortium (now called National Election Pool,
formerly Voter News Service) honest?
Here is the link for the blockbuster article on the counting of the
Iowa Caucuses by Christopher Bollyn:
Here is the content:
ELRON - VOXEO: The Israeli Defense Firm That Tallies the Iowa Caucus
Posted By: ChristopherBollyn
Date: Monday, 31 December 2007
The Israeli Defense Company
That Tallies the Iowa Caucus
By Christopher Bollyn
The Iowa caucus is only a few days away and the nation's attention
will be directed to the results, which signify the beginning of the
U.S. presidential race. But does anyone watch who tallies the results
of the Iowa caucus?
The Iowa caucus results were tallied in 2004 by a company that is
headed by a man whose company was bought by Elron Electronics, the
Israeli defense firm. I suspect that it will be the same this year.
Don't expect to see any grassroots political activists doing the tally
in Iowa. The Israeli defense establishment takes care of that part of
the American "democratic" election process.
In the summer of 2004, I first learned that a foreign and out-of-state
company using Interactive Voice Response (IVR) technology tallied the
Iowa caucus results.
The system used to tally the 2004 Iowa caucus results was provided by
a company called Voxeo, which was apparently based in Orlando,
Florida. (Yellow flag goes up in the mind of those familiar with
Orlando and electronic vote fraud history. See Bollyn article on Wang
The calls from the nearly 2,000 caucus centers in Iowa went to a Voxeo
call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
On January 31, 2005, I wrote to Michelle Bauer, Iowa's Secretary of
State with some questions about the use of Voxeo, a foreign company
located in Florida, to tally the results of the Iowa caucus:
Subject: How was the Iowa Caucus Tallied?
When I visited the headquarters of the Democratic Party in Des Moines
last summer, I learned that the tally of the Iowa caucus had been
"out-sourced" to a company in Atlanta, Georgia.
What this means is that the tallying of the Iowa caucus results was
done over the telephone, using the touch-tone buttons, to enter the
results from each caucus location
I am interested in how this was done, and why. Why did the Democratic
Party allow the crucial tally of the caucus results to be done by a
company in Atlanta? Don't they trust their own math skills?
Can any of you provide any information about this matter?
A person named Mike Milligan wrote back on behalf of Secretary of
Mike Milligan wrote:
The Secretary of State forwarded me the email you sent to then on
Monday, January 31, 2004 [sic] regarding the Iowa Caucuses.
Unfortunately you either received some incorrect information in your
travels or are confused. The Iowa Democratic Party completed all of
the caucus night tabulations in Iowa, in the Des Moines/Polk County
Convention Center, which was the Caucus night HQ. In fact, our tech
staff wrote the software that tabulated the results.
To answer your second to last question, we feel we have a comfortable
grasp of mathematics.
Mike Milligan, Executive Director
Iowa Democratic Party
(515) 244-7292 ex. 676
I wrote this note back to Mr. Milligan:
Dear Mr. Milligan,
I am responding to you about how the caucus results for the Iowa
Democratic Party were tallied on the night of the nation's first
caucus. After checking my sources, I can assure you that it is correct
that an out-of-state telephone/computer system tallied the Iowa
The system used was provided by Voxeo Corporation based in Orlando,
Florida. The calls went from Iowa to a call center in Atlanta, Georgia.
This information was first provided to me last August by John
McCormally, Communications Director for the Iowa Democratic Party in
Des Moines, Iowa.
Today I called Voxeo (800) 305-5771 in Orlando and although I didn't
go into detail, the receptionist confirmed that Voxeo had conducted
the telephone tally of the Iowa Democratic Caucus results.
How is it that you don't know that?
McCormally told me that chairmen were selected in all 1,993 precincts
and these chairmen called in on touch-tone phones and after giving
their PIN number, were able to enter the results from their precinct
using the touch-tone number pad.
I'm not going to go into great detail at this point, but this
procedure of using an out-of-state computer company to tally the
precinct results for the Iowa Democratic Caucus lacks the transparency
and openness that one might expect in this exercise in grass-roots poll.
Clearly, if someone wanted to adjust the results, it would be the
easiest thing to do to do it through this computer system in Orlando,
Florida. The Democrats in Iowa would never be aware of it, regardless
of their math skills, unless the paper results were carefully audited
in an open and honest manner.
THE ISRAELIS & VOXEO
Now, who really is Voxeo, and why are the Iowa caucus results tallied
by them? I don't know if the 2008 Iowa results will be tallied in the
same way, but I wouldn't doubt it.
Voxeo is headed by Jonathan Taylor, who is the company's President and
CEO. This is what his Voxeo webpage says about him:
Jonathan combined his experience in both business operations and
technology innovation to found Voxeo in 1999. Under his guidance,
Voxeo has seen triple-digit revenue growth for four consecutive years
and has been profitable since January, 2004. Prior to Voxeo, Jonathan
founded and helped bring three additional software and infrastructure
service companies to profitability.
From 1995 to 1997, Jonathan was the founder and President of
InterResearch and Development Group (IRdg), Inc. IRdg created and
licensed iPost - the first internet powered OEM unified messaging
solution - to leading telecommunications providers including Ericsson,
Motorola and Unisys. IRdg was acquired by Elron Electronic Industries
(Nasdq: ELRN) subsidiary MediaGate in 1997.
There you have it. Jonathan Taylor's company, which he founded, was
taken over by Elron Electronic Industries, the Israeli defense high
In its early days, Elron focused on defense, particularly electronics
and avionics, as well as the emerging medical and technology sectors.
In 1966, Elron founded Elbit, which combined the expertise of the
Ministry of Defense-Research Institute in special computer design with
Elron's experience in electronic product design, manufacture and
This is important information that Americans need to know and which
they will not find in the Zionist-controlled media in the United
States. It needs to be understood that the entire election process in
the United States is a fraud. More than that, it is a fraud that is
being perpetrated by the Israeli defense establishment on the naïve
and gullible American public.
The sine qua non of an honest and transparent election process is the
open counting of the votes by the voters themselves in each polling
station in front of the open eyes of other citizens and members of the
media. Any compromise in this most fundamental and essential process
which acts to remove the citizenry from the vote-counting process
simply cannot be accepted.
This is what Americans MUST get back to, in every polling station in
the nation: paper ballots that are hand counted in front of the public.
Nothing else will do to protect their democratic franchise in the
United States - NOTHING.
* * * * * * *
Christopher Bollyn is an independent journalist who needs the support
of his readers. If you value his research and writing, please send a
donation via PayPal to:
bollyn @ bollynbooks.com or shop @ bollynbooks.com
"Florida Election Stolen -- Computer Programmer Reveals Scheme to
Steal 2000 Vote" Christopher Bollyn, 21 December 2004
WORLD VIEW NEWS SERVICE
To subscribe to this group, send an email to:
NEWS ARCHIVE IS OPEN TO PUBLIC VIEW
Need some good karma? Appreciate the service?
Please consider donating to WVNS today.
Email ummyakoub@... for instructions.
To leave this list, send an email to: