Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Request for NOAA climate record feature

Expand Messages
  • KNHBRIST1
    A quick look and it looks great, I did notice the red zeros indicating a console reset. Shutting down for the night will check back in when I get home from
    Message 1 of 103 , Apr 7, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      A quick look and it looks great, I did notice the red zeros indicating a console reset.
      Shutting down for the night will check back in when I get home from work tomorrow night.
      Thanks for all you do for us Don.
      Steve


      --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don Lafferty <don@...> wrote:
      >
      > Okay I think I've got all the bugs we found.
      >
      > http://donlafferty.com/NOAAReportMaker0003.zip
      >
      > Once I'm (fairly) sure of that I'll start adding some of the fluff it needs
      > and I'll look at doing the yearly report.
      >
      > I can also look at importing the CSV files John posted the link too.
      >
      > I found a file in my archive that is about 4 years long. It's almost 1 GB
      > in size.
      >
      > Don
      >
      >
      > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Don Lafferty <don@...> wrote:
      >
      > > Yes I've noticed that on a few files. It's obviously a bug in the code.
      > > I'll take a look and see what's doing it.
      > >
      > >
      > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 4:56 PM, KNHBRIST1 <steve_03222@...> wrote:
      > >
      > >> **
      > >>
      > >>
      > >> Don, also of note is that it shows May 2013 and when I open May it shows
      > >> one entry with various symbols.
      > >> Steve
      > >>
      > >>
      > >> --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, "KNHBRIST1" <steve_03222@>
      > >> wrote:
      > >> >
      > >> > Great,Let me know if I can any more testing.
      > >> >
      > >> > Steve
      > >> >
      > >> > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don Lafferty <don@> wrote:
      > >> > >
      > >> > > Yeah I didn't see any recorded on your page so I figured that was the
      > >> case.
      > >> > >
      > >> > > I added logic to ignore if rainfall has been reset but I also make
      > >> the cell
      > >> > > have a red letter.
      > >> > >
      > >> > >
      > >> > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 3:24 PM, KNHBRIST1 <steve_03222@> wrote:
      > >> > >
      > >> > > > **
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > > No rain days in February here, only snow and I do not have a heater
      > >> on my
      > >> > > > LaCrosse rain gauge. It is possible that I reset at that time as I
      > >> did have
      > >> > > > rain in January. I keep it covered when snowing. I reset each
      > >> month, not
      > >> > > > always on th e1st although I try...LOL
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > > Steve
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don Lafferty <don@>
      > >> wrote:
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > > Yes my earlier logic stopped looking once it saw a 0 in the
      > >> month. The
      > >> > > > new
      > >> > > > > logic just keeps looking but ignores records with a timedate
      > >> stamp of 0.
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > > I also see the Rain in Feb is messed up. That's kind of odd in
      > >> that you
      > >> > > > > didn't have any measured precipitation in Feb when I look at your
      > >> > > > > Wunderground page. Did you possibly reset the rain total around
      > >> Feb 4th
      > >> > > > or
      > >> > > > > 5th?
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 3:09 PM, KNHBRIST1 <steve_03222@> wrote:
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > **
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > Don, That work fine. Not sure what is going on though the #
      > >> rtecords on
      > >> > > > > > the days that were missing before are in th e9,000's only one
      > >> was in
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > 8,000's
      > >> > > > > > Shows all days now and no 30th of FEB
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > Steve
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don Lafferty <don@>
      > >> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > I don't understand why there are bad points but maybe Heath
      > >> can shed
      > >> > > > some
      > >> > > > > > > light on it.
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > At any rate I've made some changes.
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > http://donlafferty.com/NOAAReportMaker0002.zip
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > If you right click on any of the monthly reports you have a
      > >> choice to
      > >> > > > > > > remove the selected tab or show a column that has a count of
      > >> the
      > >> > > > records
      > >> > > > > > in
      > >> > > > > > > a given measurement. On your file they were typically a bit
      > >> over 9000
      > >> > > > > > > measurements per day. If you have a day that has a small
      > >> amount of
      > >> > > > > > > measurements in the record it's probably not a reliable
      > >> record.
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > I only included the actual program file in this one. Just
      > >> copy over
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > other one.
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > Don
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 2:18 PM, KNHBRIST1 <steve_03222@>
      > >> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > **
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > I wonder why it has bad datapoints?
      > >> > > > > > > > I don;t touch it at all, just have WUHU generate the file.
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > Steve
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don Lafferty
      > >> <don@>
      > >> > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > I got it and it's helping a lot. The file has some date
      > >> entries
      > >> > > > that
      > >> > > > > > are
      > >> > > > > > > > > basically = 0 so I've got to deal with that possibility.
      > >> I'm
      > >> > > > > > figuring out
      > >> > > > > > > > > how many bad data points it has now.
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 1:43 PM, KNHBRIST1 <steve_03222@>
      > >> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > **
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > OK, looks like it went as a zipped. Tried something
      > >> call Yahoo
      > >> > > > drop
      > >> > > > > > > > box,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > but that didn;t seem to go so well.......LOL
      > >> > > > > > > > > > Let me know if you get it.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > Steve
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don
      > >> Lafferty <don@
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > To zip it you should be able to right click on it and
      > >> choose
      > >> > > > > > Send ->
      > >> > > > > > > > to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > Compressed Folder.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > How large is it? It should be about 1/10 the size
      > >> once it's
      > >> > > > > > zipped.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > Do you know how to ftp a file? You would need an ftp
      > >> client
      > >> > > > (or
      > >> > > > > > do
      > >> > > > > > > > > > command
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > line but unless you're a major geek like me ;) you
      > >> would
      > >> > > > need a
      > >> > > > > > > > program).
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 1:24 PM, KNHBRIST1
      > >> <steve_03222@>
      > >> > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > **
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Looks like i can not send it Don and I have no clue
      > >> how or
      > >> > > > if I
      > >> > > > > > > > can FTP
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the file.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I don't seem to hae an option to zip it.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Steve
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com,
      > >> "KNHBRIST1"
      > >> > > > > > > > <steve_03222@>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Don I will send the file. I don;t have HWpro on
      > >> this
      > >> > > > computer
      > >> > > > > > > > and I
      > >> > > > > > > > > > can
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > not seem to find a version that will open the .dat
      > >> file. I
      > >> > > > was
      > >> > > > > > > > gonna
      > >> > > > > > > > > > check
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > to see if it was my file or not.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com, Don
      > >> Lafferty
      > >> > > > > > <don@>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Han,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can just unzip the file anywhere that's
      > >> convenient
      > >> > > > for
      > >> > > > > > > > you. I
      > >> > > > > > > > > > would
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggest making a folder under My Documents and
      > >> name it
      > >> > > > NOAA
      > >> > > > > > > > Report
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Maker.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently it doesn't need the other files in
      > >> the zip
      > >> > > > but
      > >> > > > > > when
      > >> > > > > > > > I add
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > PDF and
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > printing ability it will.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve: The calculation for heating and cooling
      > >> days is
      > >> > > > > > here:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > >
      > >> http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/cdus/degree_days/ddayexp.shtml
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Basically you add the high and low temps and
      > >> divide by
      > >> > > > 2
      > >> > > > > > then
      > >> > > > > > > > if
      > >> > > > > > > > > > it's
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > above
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 65 you subtract 65 from it and that's your
      > >> cooling
      > >> > > > days. If
      > >> > > > > > > > it's
      > >> > > > > > > > > > below
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > subtract it from 65 and that's your heating
      > >> days.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So if your high and low added up to 140 you
      > >> would get
      > >> > > > 70
      > >> > > > > > when
      > >> > > > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > divided
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > it by 2 and then subtract 65 from it to give
      > >> you a
      > >> > > > cooling
      > >> > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > of
      > >> > > > > > > > > > 5.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Glad to hear it seems to be working. If a day
      > >> or many
      > >> > > > days
      > >> > > > > > are
      > >> > > > > > > > > > missing
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > will skip them if they are in the middle or end
      > >> of the
      > >> > > > > > month.
      > >> > > > > > > > If
      > >> > > > > > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > are
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > missing at the beginning of the month it should
      > >> make
      > >> > > > blank
      > >> > > > > > > > lines.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > I'm
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > not
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > sure how I want to handle that. I'm thinking
      > >> just
      > >> > > > ignore
      > >> > > > > > days
      > >> > > > > > > > that
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > have no
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > data rather than make blank ones?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not quite sure how you got a 30th day in
      > >> February but
      > >> > > > if
      > >> > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > can
      > >> > > > > > > > > > send
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > me
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > the file or I can give you a location to ftp it
      > >> to I'll
      > >> > > > > > figure
      > >> > > > > > > > it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > out.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Han
      > >> Brouwer-Keij <
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > han.brouwer-keij@> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > **
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I downloaded it and have no problems. Didn't
      > >> follow
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > whole
      > >> > > > > > > > > > tread.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Like
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to know where to install the files.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > greatings,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Han
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7-4-2013 21:11, Don Lafferty wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If anyone is interested in trying out an Alpha
      > >> > > > version
      > >> > > > > > of the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > NOAA
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Report
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maker you can get it here.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> http://donlafferty.com/NOAAReportMaker0001.zip
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When you download it your browser is probably
      > >> going
      > >> > > > to
      > >> > > > > > tell
      > >> > > > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > it's
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > questionable and suggest you discard it. If
      > >> that
      > >> > > > bothers
      > >> > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > then you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > probably don't want to be involved in testing
      > >> this.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After you download it unzip it somewhere on
      > >> your hard
      > >> > > > > > drive.
      > >> > > > > > > > The
      > >> > > > > > > > > > zip
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > file has the program and several DLL files
      > >> that will
      > >> > > > be
      > >> > > > > > > > needed
      > >> > > > > > > > > > later
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > when I
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > add PDF support.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I would put the files in a folder that you
      > >> can easily
      > >> > > > > > find. I
      > >> > > > > > > > > > use one
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in the My Documents folder usually.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After you have it unzipped click on File/Open
      > >> File
      > >> > > > and a
      > >> > > > > > file
      > >> > > > > > > > > > dialog
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will pop up. Navigate to your WUHU folder and
      > >> find
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > .dat
      > >> > > > > > > > file
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > that has
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > a name similar to HW Pro History.dat or
      > >> similar. Make
      > >> > > > > > sure
      > >> > > > > > > > it's
      > >> > > > > > > > > > NOT
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WUHU History.dat file as that will not work.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You must have clicked the Weather Pro
      > >> Compatible
      > >> > > > History
      > >> > > > > > file
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > (LaCrosse
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > format) in your setup to create one of these
      > >> files.
      > >> > > > If
      > >> > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > hadn't
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > done
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that before make sure you do it and then let
      > >> WUHU
      > >> > > > create
      > >> > > > > > a
      > >> > > > > > > > few
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > records
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > before you read the file.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am looking for feedback on a few things.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) Does it work for you and if not what error
      > >> > > > messages
      > >> > > > > > do you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > get?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2) If it works what do you think about the
      > >> format? I
      > >> > > > > > will be
      > >> > > > > > > > > > adding
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > more
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > info to each of the tabs that are created but
      > >> for now
      > >> > > > > > it's
      > >> > > > > > > > just
      > >> > > > > > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > monthly
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > data.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3) Any other suggestions you have.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for trying it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Don Lafferty
      > >> <don@>
      > >> > > > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Yes that's the way I'm doing it now.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:41 AM, wuhu_software
      > >> > > > > > > > <wuhu_software@
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> I am not sure actually. I am guessing that
      > >> was
      > >> > > > > > supposed to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > represent the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> new rainfall since the last measurement. It
      > >> is
      > >> > > > really
      > >> > > > > > > > > > un-necessary
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > as you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> can just subtract the last measurement
      > >> total with
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > latest
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > measurement to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> determine the "new" rainfall amount.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> --- In wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com,
      > >> Don
      > >> > > > > > Lafferty
      > >> > > > > > > > <don@
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ><don@>wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Heath,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Yes thank you for the file. I've been
      > >> using it.
      > >> > > > The
      > >> > > > > > issue
      > >> > > > > > > > > > with
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > rain as
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > far as I can tell is it doesn't actually
      > >> record
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > amount of
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > rain for
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> just
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > a single measurement. I didn't see any
      > >> numbers in
      > >> > > > > > > > > > NewRainfall in
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > any of
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > the files (I think anyways). Did I miss
      > >> it?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > It looks like TotalRainfall is whatever
      > >> the
      > >> > > > console
      > >> > > > > > is
      > >> > > > > > > > > > holding
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > as the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> total.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Should I revisit NewRainfall?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 8:00 AM, H. Smith
      > >> > > > > > <wuhu_software@
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ><wuhu_software@>wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > **
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Don,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > I did send that file via FTP.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > It does save every measurement.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Heath
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > ------------------------------
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > *From:* Don Lafferty <don@> <don@>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > *To:*
      > >> wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > *Sent:* Friday, April 5, 2013 12:00 PM
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > *Subject:* Re: [wuhu_software_group] Re:
      > >> > > > Request
      > >> > > > > > for
      > >> > > > > > > > NOAA
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > climate
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> record
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > feature
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Do you know how many months it covers?
      > >> Mine is
      > >> > > > > > huge yet
      > >> > > > > > > > > > only
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > covers 5
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > months.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Does that file get written at each
      > >> measurement
      > >> > > > > > received
      > >> > > > > > > > > > from
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> console?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > I've been using a Davis Pro 2 for the
      > >> last few
      > >> > > > > > months
      > >> > > > > > > > and
      > >> > > > > > > > > > it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > reports
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> every
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > few seconds. Before that I had a WMR968
      > >> and it
      > >> > > > was
      > >> > > > > > > > > > something
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > like
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> every 8
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > seconds. I know most LaCrosse don't
      > >> report
      > >> > > > nearly
      > >> > > > > > as
      > >> > > > > > > > often.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > At any rate if you could zip it and ftp
      > >> it to
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > location
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I'll send
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> you.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Thanks
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 8:27 AM,
      > >> wuhu_software
      > >> > > > > > > > > > <wuhu_software@
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > ><wuhu_software@>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > **
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > I have about a 157 MB file, not yet
      > >> zipped.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > Let me know how you would like to
      > >> receive it.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > --- In
      > >> wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com,
      > >> > > > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > Lafferty
      > >> > > > > > > > > > <don@
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > I need the largest copy of a
      > >> HWProHistory.dat
      > >> > > > > > file
      > >> > > > > > > > that
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > someone is
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > willing
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > to send me. It will have to be zipped
      > >> or rar
      > >> > > > or
      > >> > > > > > even
      > >> > > > > > > > 7z
      > >> > > > > > > > > > but
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > if you
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> have
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > one that has been keeping history for
      > >> a year
      > >> > > > or
      > >> > > > > > more
      > >> > > > > > > > I
      > >> > > > > > > > > > would
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > like
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> a copy.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > My largest is 150 MB but has only
      > >> been going
      > >> > > > for
      > >> > > > > > > > about 5
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > months.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > If you have one and are willing to
      > >> send it
      > >> > > > to me
      > >> > > > > > or
      > >> > > > > > > > put
      > >> > > > > > > > > > it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > on an
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> ftp
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > server
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > let me know and I'll give you my email
      > >> > > > address.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Thanks
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Don
      > >> Lafferty
      > >> > > > > > <don@>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > I'm sorry I should have mentioned
      > >> that was
      > >> > > > > > just a
      > >> > > > > > > > > > status
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > update.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> It
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > currently doesn't do anything
      > >> useful. As
      > >> > > > soon
      > >> > > > > > as it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > does
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > I'll
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> make it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > available.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Han
      > >> > > > > > Brouwer-Keij <
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > han.brouwer-keij@> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> **
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Where to download?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Han
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> On 5-4-2013 0:30, Don Lafferty
      > >> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> I've got a simple working program
      > >> that
      > >> > > > will
      > >> > > > > > read
      > >> > > > > > > > a WS
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > 3600 file
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> into
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > an
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> array structure.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> I have a file that's been going
      > >> since
      > >> > > > > > November of
      > >> > > > > > > > last
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > year and
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> it's
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> almost 150 MB in size with over 2.5
      > >> > > > million
      > >> > > > > > > > records.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> How large can that file get?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> My program reads the data in very
      > >> quickly
      > >> > > > ( ~
      > >> > > > > > 13
      > >> > > > > > > > > > seconds
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> read the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> full 150 MB file) so a large file
      > >> doesn't
      > >> > > > > > really
      > >> > > > > > > > cause
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > problems
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> but
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > 2.5
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> million records is only 5 months.
      > >> I can
      > >> > > > > > imagine if
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > someone has
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> a file
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> that's been filling for several
      > >> years.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Oh yeah, what's the key to the wind
      > >> > > > direction?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > Everything
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > else
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> makes
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> sense.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Don
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:55 PM,
      > >> > > > wuhu_software
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > <wuhu_software@
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > ...>wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> Marcel,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> There is a lot more than meets
      > >> the eye
      > >> > > > and it
      > >> > > > > > > > will
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > remain just
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> as
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > simple
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> and easy no matter what is added
      > >> in the
      > >> > > > > > future.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> --- In
      > >> > > > wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > "marcelcanine"
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> <marcelcanine@> <marcelcanine@>
      > >> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > I would like to comment on this.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > The thing I like best about
      > >> WUHU is
      > >> > > > that
      > >> > > > > > it is
      > >> > > > > > > > > > small
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > simple
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> and
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> reliable. I run it on a netbook
      > >> and it
      > >> > > > simply
      > >> > > > > > > > runs
      > >> > > > > > > > > > for
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > months
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > sometimes
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> without me having to touch it. I
      > >> read
      > >> > > > where
      > >> > > > > > other
      > >> > > > > > > > > > more
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> complicated
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > do it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> all programs like Weather Display
      > >> and
      > >> > > > Virtual
      > >> > > > > > > > Weather
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > station
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> seem
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > to be
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> always be crashing or locking up.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > Please try to keep WUHU as
      > >> close to it
      > >> > > > as
      > >> > > > > > > > possible.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > There are
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > plenty
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> of programs out there that can be
      > >> used by
      > >> > > > > > people
      > >> > > > > > > > who
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > want the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > program to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> publish web sites and create all
      > >> kinds of
      > >> > > > > > fancy
      > >> > > > > > > > > > reports.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > Some
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> of us
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > just
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> want a simple program to upload to
      > >> > > > > > established
      > >> > > > > > > > sites
      > >> > > > > > > > > > that
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> works with
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > little
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> maintenance.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > --- In
      > >> > > > wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com
      > >> > > > > > ,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > "wuhu_software"
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> <wuhu_software@> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Steve,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > It would be a nice feature to
      > >> have
      > >> > > > but
      > >> > > > > > like
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > everything
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> else it
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > takes
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> time. With a full-time job my
      > >> time is
      > >> > > > > > limited to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > weekends
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> only. A
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > feature
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> like this could easily consume a
      > >> day to
      > >> > > > > > implement
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > properly.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > As to implementing it, this
      > >> could
      > >> > > > easily
      > >> > > > > > be
      > >> > > > > > > > > > added as
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > a
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> feature
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > for
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> analyzing the history files,
      > >> especially
      > >> > > > if
      > >> > > > > > you
      > >> > > > > > > > have
      > >> > > > > > > > > > them
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> broken up
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > by month
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> automatically (easy to do). Since
      > >> the
      > >> > > > data is
      > >> > > > > > > > already
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > loaded
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> at that
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > point,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> it would just be a matter of
      > >> running
      > >> > > > through
      > >> > > > > > a
      > >> > > > > > > > few
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > routines to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > create the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> line by line output.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > This could also be done as a
      > >> separate
      > >> > > > > > > > executable
      > >> > > > > > > > > > that
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> takes the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> history files as input.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > If anyone out there is a
      > >> software
      > >> > > > > > developer
      > >> > > > > > > > and
      > >> > > > > > > > > > so
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> inclined as to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> pitch in with such an effort, I
      > >> can
      > >> > > > supply
      > >> > > > > > > > details
      > >> > > > > > > > > > about
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > how to
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > implement
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> this.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Thanks.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > --- In
      > >> > > > > > wuhu_software_group@yahoogroups.com,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > "Rogo"
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > <steve.rogowski@>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> wrote:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Hello...
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > First off this WUHU
      > >> software is
      > >> > > > > > awesome. I
      > >> > > > > > > > just
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > set up a
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > weather
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> station and it made looking at and
      > >> > > > uploading
      > >> > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > data so
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > easy.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > I used WeatherLink (From
      > >> Davis)
      > >> > > > for a
      > >> > > > > > short
      > >> > > > > > > > > > bit. I
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > liked
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > NOAA
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> report feature where it would
      > >> summarize
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > month (by
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > day) and
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> year
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > (by
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> month). Does WUHU offer something
      > >> like
      > >> > > > this
      > >> > > > > > > > already?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > If
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > not,
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> would
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > you be
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> inclined to add such a report
      > >> feature (to
      > >> > > > > > create
      > >> > > > > > > > PDF
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > files for
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > archiving)?
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks!
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Steve
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> The day Microsoft starts making
      > >> vacuum
      > >> > > > > > cleaners
      > >> > > > > > > > is the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > day they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Gecontroleerd door AVG -
      > >> www.avg.com
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Versie: 2013.0.3267 /
      > >> Virusdatabase:
      > >> > > > > > 3162/6224 -
      > >> > > > > > > > > > datum van
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> uitgifte:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> 04/04/13
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Gecontroleerd door AVG -
      > >> www.avg.com
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> Versie: 2013.0.3267 /
      > >> Virusdatabase:
      > >> > > > > > 3162/6224 -
      > >> > > > > > > > > > datum van
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> uitgifte:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >> 04/04/13
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > The day Microsoft starts making
      > >> vacuum
      > >> > > > > > cleaners is
      > >> > > > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum
      > >> > > > cleaners
      > >> > > > > > is
      > >> > > > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum
      > >> > > > cleaners is
      > >> > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > they start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum
      > >> cleaners
      > >> > > > is
      > >> > > > > > the
      > >> > > > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The day Microsoft starts making vacuum
      > >> cleaners is
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum
      > >> cleaners is
      > >> > > > the
      > >> > > > > > day
      > >> > > > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Versie: 2013.0.3272 / Virusdatabase:
      > >> 3162/6230 -
      > >> > > > datum
      > >> > > > > > van
      > >> > > > > > > > > > uitgifte:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 04/07/13
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geen virus gevonden in dit bericht.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Gecontroleerd door AVG - www.avg.com
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Versie: 2013.0.3272 / Virusdatabase:
      > >> 3162/6230 -
      > >> > > > datum
      > >> > > > > > van
      > >> > > > > > > > > > uitgifte:
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 04/07/13
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners
      > >> is the
      > >> > > > day
      > >> > > > > > they
      > >> > > > > > > > > > start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is
      > >> the day
      > >> > > > they
      > >> > > > > > start
      > >> > > > > > > > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the
      > >> day they
      > >> > > > start
      > >> > > > > > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > > > --
      > >> > > > > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the day
      > >> they start
      > >> > > > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > > > >
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > > >
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > > > --
      > >> > > > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the day they
      > >> start
      > >> > > > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > > > >
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > >
      > >> > > >
      > >> > >
      > >> > >
      > >> > >
      > >> > > --
      > >> > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the day they start
      > >> > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >> > >
      > >> >
      > >>
      > >>
      > >>
      > >
      > >
      > >
      > > --
      > > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the day they start
      > > making something that doesn't suck.
      > >
      >
      >
      >
      > --
      > The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the day they start
      > making something that doesn't suck.
      >
    • Steve Rogowski
      Probably. But I was able to grab them from version 9. Now printing works well. Thanks, Steve
      Message 103 of 103 , May 12, 2013
      • 0 Attachment
        Probably. But I was able to grab them from version 9. Now printing works well.

        Thanks,
        Steve


        On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Don Lafferty <don@...> wrote:
         

        Yes you need the files that were in the earlier versions.  Perhaps I should include them each time?


        On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Steve Rogowski <steve.rogowski@...> wrote:
         

        Don,

        Nice! It picked up data for both April and May now.

        I especially appreciate being able to edit the data before generating the webpage. I had a day with bad rainfall data and was able to correct it and the monthly total in your GUI. The only figure I could not correct was the max daily rainfall calculated at the bottom.

        I was unable to print, I don't know if that feature was supposed to work in this version. Got an error when attempting print preview and print...perhaps I am just missing some files?

        Thanks,
        Steve



        On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Don Lafferty <don@...> wrote:
         

        There's a new version that has the changes to the columns suggested by Steve (Rogo) and a decent web page maker.  If you use the web page then make sure you put the noaastyle.css in the same folder as you put the html file.  You can change lots of things using the CSS file.


        Don




        --
        The day Microsoft starts making vacuum cleaners is the day they start making something that doesn't suck.


      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.