128RE: [wuhu_software_group] Re: Replacement for Heavyweather.
- Aug 2 7:02 AMAs I said, my skills are limited and C/C++ is not a strength.
What history does LaCrosse have for making mods at users request? If they
don't do it as a matter of course then waiting for them is likely to be a
waste of time (I use a Meade LX200GPS scope in my observatory and the
company does listen to users and makes changes to the scopes
software/firmware on a regular basis)
Writing the file once a minute isn't really the problem is it? It's the
Maximum Gust speed that seems to have been ignored (unless the gust occurred
inside that 9 second update time) or was it rejected as eronious data?
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of wuhu_software
Sent: Tuesday, 2 August 2005 11:17 PM
Subject: [wuhu_software_group] Re: Replacement for Heavyweather.
Unfortunately WUHU is currently only able to collect the weather data
from the station via HeavyWeather output. The Heavyweather
application is currently writing the currdat.lst file once per minute
(even in wired mode that updates the Heavyweather display every 9
seconds). It may update the data on the screen, but that
is not available to us. This is a horrible limitation to have,
especially when we are interested in events of a very short duration
like wind gust data.
As an example I experienced a severe storm last month. The winds were
calm prior to a wind gust that came through the area. I would
estimate the winds were at least 50-60 mph. Many large trees in the
area fell, including a large one that narrowly missed my home. When I
checked the recorded weather gust data, the highest wind that I was
able to catch was 25 mph. Very disappointing.
For this reason I posted a message about writing a replacement for
Heavyweather. Ideally, it would be able to read the weather data
every 9 seconds or so (as Heavyweather does), and also output this
data to currdat.lst. It would also be desireable to have a nice user
interface with gauges, graphs, and so on.
The only road block I see with writing a replacement is the support
for the 36xx series. The 23xx series protocol has been successfully
decoded and the source code is available in C from the open2300
source code project (see links).
The alternative to re-writing Heavyweather is to contact LaCrosse and
ask them for a couple of updates.
1) Faster update rates for currdat.lst. As mentioned, Heavyweather is
writing this file only once per minute. I have already requested this
2) Better error checking on the weather data. The data sent to
currdat.lst may or not be checked for errors. My guess is that it is
I am a bit leery of waiting for LaCrosse to modify their application.
If the weather enthusiasts are not complaining, there is little
motivation to do so.
--- In email@example.com, "David Higgins"
> I have very limited programming skills (I can program in MS VB) butaccurate
> would like to assist anyway I can. I am most interested in
> and timely wind gust information whether it be graphical or not butloss
> a line chart is perhaps the most useful for me - one line for
> average and one line for gust (or any other means of indicating a
> David Higgins
> Canberra, Australia
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "wuhu_software"
> <wuhu_software@y...> wrote:
> > All,
> > I am interested in writing a replacement for Heavyweather for the
> > Windows platform. The current heavyweather software writes to the
> > currdat.lst file only once per minute, even though the data is
> > collected every 8 seconds in wired mode. This can result in a
> > wind gust data.
> > I had submitted a request to the authors of Heavyweather asking
> > to write the currdat.lst file whenever the weather data changes
> > rather than once per minute although I do not have much
> > that they will do so.The
> > The other day I experienced a severe storm with high winds. I
> > estimate that the wind speed was at least 60 mph at it's peak.
> > unit was only able to capture speeds at 25 and 22 mph over a 10Yahoo! Groups Links
> > minute period. If the station were updating at 8 seconds, I would
> > have probably accurately captured the peak windspeed.
> > Since the Heavyweather application cannot accurately capture
> > changing wind speeds, I would like to write a replacement for the
> > Heavyweather application.
> > Although I could use open2300 to extract data from the unit, the
> > consequence would be a loss of the graphical user interface with
> > gauges and controls.
> > The other possibility is to just display the weather data in a
> > jane text form on WUHU. This would not be as pretty as
> > but it would get the job done.
> > If anyone has some programming experience and would like to help
> > writing a replacement for Heavyweather, let me know.
> > Thanks.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.8/61 - Release Date: 1/08/2005
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>