RE: [wtl] Re: Re: Why wtl? Why not .Net/C#
- Hi Andrew,
> 2) Server side functionality could be reperesented as a collection ofInteresting, I'll check it out. I want to allocate thousands of objects
> stateless functions (good and classic design) exposed to the
> outer world.
> During invocation of such function memory allocation can be performed
> upfront (in most cases) - one chunk of memory where all
> object will be
> placed. Upon exit of the function it is enough to just
> delete/free this
> chunk as one block without need to call particular
> destructors. So server
> side software could use very simple and fast memory
> management. In GC world
> such allocation schema happens automaticly. Allocation there
> is extremely
> simple and collection of garbage happens (as a rule) after
> function exit.
> (GC is not a must to use such schema . You can implement
> it by hands.
> E.g. Apache server uses memory pools for that.
> Implementation is available also as a standalone package:
> APR - http://apr.apache.org/)
that I will be disposing of all at once.
I have experienced GC-related UI-freeze back in 1980's with the Amstrad
CPC64's implementation of Basic (the Amstrad was a poor cousin to the
Commodore 64, more popular in the UK, less popular here in Australia, and I
think unheard of in the US).