Bruce Brackin <bbrackin@...
> I have a question/suggestion to the group. Would it be worthwhile to
> add a 'de' to message #1? Several have sent reports but not sure who
> was calling vs being called. Adding the 'de' would help much like the
> single 26 and 2626 setting order of calls in message #2. It would
> probably help more on 6m where b/s can be better than direct at times.
> Would not take a second to add it for RH. I'm going to try it tomorrow.
A great idea! I'm going to use it also. And, personally, I think that
the report sequence 'CCCCC RR CCCCC RRRR' should be changed to:
'CCCCC RR RR CCCCC'. That way when you get a partial message like
'26 K9SQL' you know who is doing the sending. I suppose this could be
confused with a partial multi-tone 'R26 K9SQL', but I'm just a noobie,
so what do I know ;-)
Bob Poortinga K9SQL
Bloomington, Indiana US