Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

RE: [wsjtgroup] antennas compared

Expand Messages
  • drlee6530
    Seems to me a wast of money for 1/2 DB. I do not change unless it is too old an does not work or I find I have more money than brains, but1/2 DB yoe will not
    Message 1 of 2 , Sep 5, 2007
    • 0 Attachment
      Seems to me a wast of money for 1/2 DB. I do not change unless it is too
      old an does not work
      or I find I have more money than brains, but1/2 DB yoe will not even
      knowtice any difference!

      Dr Dana-Renee Lee PhD

      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
      > [mailto:wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of wa1vta01452
      > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2007 7:41 PM
      > To: wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
      > Subject: [wsjtgroup] antennas compared
      >
      >
      > Hi,
      >
      > could anyone out there tell me whether an M2 18XXX, 36 ft
      > boom, would materially improve reception over my present KLM
      > 16LBX with 28 ft boom? I am not convinced that the
      > additional 1/2db or so, and almost same E-plane side-lobe
      > pattern (-17db on the LBX and -19db on the
      > 18XXX) would make a significant difference particularly in
      > EME. Any thoughts are appreciated...If I should be asking
      > this somewhere else, pls let me know.
      >
      > Tom
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > To unsubscribe, send an email to:
      > wsjtgroup-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      >
      > Activity Periods http://www.ykc.com/wa5ufh/
      > NAHSMS Contest Page http://www.ykc.com/wa5ufh/Rally/NAHSMS.htm
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.