Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fwd: Re: [wsjtgroup] RE: No decode

Expand Messages
  • HB9ARI, Rudi
    ... De : hb9ari@bluewin.ch Date : 11/10/2013 - 19:31 (GMT) A : yahoogroups@joekatz.com Objet : Re: [wsjtgroup] RE: No decode Joe, Thank you for the reply. The
    Message 1 of 1 , Oct 11, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      ----Message d'origine----
      De : hb9ari@...
      Date : 11/10/2013 - 19:31 (GMT)
      A : yahoogroups@...
      Objet : Re: [wsjtgroup] RE: No decode


      Thank you for the reply.

      The levels manually decoded with double-clicking are between -5 and -24 dB; after looking in my log,
      i've many "automatically" reports in the -22 to -24 dB; i'm sure they were decoded ok because i've never
      answered to a manually decoded (CQ) message.

      I will continue to find a "solution".

      73 QRO,
      Rudi, HB9ARI

      ----Message d'origine----
      De : yahoogroups@...
      Date : 11/10/2013 - 18:28 (GMT)
      A : wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
      Objet : [wsjtgroup] RE: No decode


      What are the db level reports of those message?  Are they close to -22 or less? I've found WSJT-X doesn't try to decode those, while JT65-HF does (using the KVASD higher complexity error correction algorithm).

      ---In wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com, <hb9ari@...> wrote:


      Sometimes, the JT9 messages are not decoded
      "automatically"; these same messages, when i double click on the traces
      are perfectly decoded. What is the explanation ?
      At the same sequence, all decodable JT65 messages are decoded

      Thank you for your reply.

      73 QRO,
      Rudi, HB9ARI

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.