Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Fwd: Re: [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x

Expand Messages
  • HB9ARI, Rudi
    ... De : hb9ari@bluewin.ch Date : 23/09/2013 - 10:21 (GMT) A : f8rz@orange.fr Objet : Re: [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x Hello Jean, I am entirely in agreement
    Message 1 of 1 , Sep 23, 2013
      ----Message d'origine----
      De : hb9ari@...
      Date : 23/09/2013 - 10:21 (GMT)
      A : f8rz@...
      Objet : Re: [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x

      Hello Jean,

      I am entirely in agreement with you Jean !

      My best 73,
      Rudi, HB9ARI

      PS Sorry for the french language use !

      Suite à cette série de messages concernant la puissance,
      il me semblait aussi que l'affichage était en cause !
      Mais faute de connaissances en anglais, je me suis abstenu
      d'envoyer un email.
      Merci de l'avoir fait Jean !

      ----Message d'origine----
      De : f8rz@...
      Date : 23/09/2013 - 09:06 (GMT)
      A : wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
      Objet : [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x


      Hello all...

      Instead of re-opening the boring thread about power, I think we should
      focuse on the waterfall itself.

      Sorry to say that it is not yet what it should/could be.

      Like most of you I used JT65-HF before, and was perfectly satisfied with
      the waterfall, with the help of the "smooth" command, which provides a
      drastic levelling of all the signals.

      If this type of signal processing existed in WSJT-X, it would allow
      seeing comfortably the smallest JT9 signals and the biggest JT65 as well.

      Presenty the choice is seeing correctly the JT9 sigs, - and white cheese
      on the left part of the WF, or having the biggest JT65 ok-and losing
      most of the JT9... (and some of the JT65).
      (note that I say "seeing" and not "decoding", which is a different

      Our beloved designers are necessarily aware of this situation, and I'm
      sure that some day they will give us an enhanced display... (Thanks by
      advance !)

      Best 73 to all

      Jean F8RZ

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.