Fwd: Re: [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x
De : hb9ari@...
Date : 23/09/2013 - 10:21 (GMT)
A : f8rz@...
Objet : Re: [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x
I am entirely in agreement with you Jean !
My best 73,
PS Sorry for the french language use !
Suite à cette série de messages concernant la puissance,
il me semblait aussi que l'affichage était en cause !
Mais faute de connaissances en anglais, je me suis abstenu
d'envoyer un email.
Merci de l'avoir fait Jean !
De : f8rz@...
Date : 23/09/2013 - 09:06 (GMT)
A : firstname.lastname@example.org
Objet : [wsjtgroup] WATERFALL wsjt-x
Instead of re-opening the boring thread about power, I think we should
focuse on the waterfall itself.
Sorry to say that it is not yet what it should/could be.
Like most of you I used JT65-HF before, and was perfectly satisfied with
the waterfall, with the help of the "smooth" command, which provides a
drastic levelling of all the signals.
If this type of signal processing existed in WSJT-X, it would allow
seeing comfortably the smallest JT9 signals and the biggest JT65 as well.
Presenty the choice is seeing correctly the JT9 sigs, - and white cheese
on the left part of the WF, or having the biggest JT65 ok-and losing
most of the JT9... (and some of the JT65).
(note that I say "seeing" and not "decoding", which is a different
Our beloved designers are necessarily aware of this situation, and I'm
sure that some day they will give us an enhanced display... (Thanks by
Best 73 to all