Re: [wsjtgroup] Re: how much power is appropriate on 6 meters JT9?
- On 6/13/2013 10:26 AM, Thomas F Giella W4HM wrote:
> 1500 watts, even 100 watts would more than likely wipe out the waterfallWhen that happens, the receiving station may need a better receiver.
> for most ham's on the receiving end.
There are detailed reviews of the technical capabilities of most
currently available transceivers on the ARRL website, as well as on Rob
I agree completely with Lance -- the WSJT modes are WEAK SIGNAL modes,
NOT QRP modes. Signals can be weak because the propagation path is
difficult, or because the stations involved have poor antennas, or
because they CHOOSE to run QRP. One of the principal uses of WSJT modes
is to work paths that have VERY high losses, and need the combination of
high power, great antennas, and the noise immunity of these modes to
have a chance of making a QSO.
A station running high power as two obligations -- to stay out of the
way of others already using a given frequency, and by keeping their
transmitted signal CLEAN. Most rigs that get blown away be strong
signals also put out dirty signals -- that is, they take up more than
their share of bandwidth.
To have a clean signal, we must have a clean transceiver, a clean power
amp, and we must carefully tune the power amp for minimum distortion.
This is an obligation. Running QRP is a CHOICE, not a requirement.
73, Jim K9YC