Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

10434Re: [wsjtgroup] Re: WSJT-X v1.0 r3323: Ambiguous entries in ADIF log file when QSO crosses 00:00 UTC

Expand Messages
  • Carol & Fred Darrah
    Jun 6, 2013
    • 0 Attachment
      When I start a QSO in JT9 mode the date is entered first. The next figure is the time I respond to the call, or give a report. If the date or time is not what you think is right you have the ability to change the items before you log the contact. Where is the the problem for some operators and not others?
      Fred  N9GUE

      --- On Wed, 6/5/13, g4wjs <bill.8@...> wrote:

      From: g4wjs <bill.8@...>
      Subject: [wsjtgroup] Re: WSJT-X v1.0 r3323: Ambiguous entries in ADIF log file when QSO crosses 00:00 UTC
      To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@...>, wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Wednesday, June 5, 2013, 8:51 PM


      --- In wsjtgroup@yahoogroups.com, "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@...> wrote:
      > > Separating time and date into two fields is not acceptable since it
      > > appears one refers to the start time and the other the end date!
      > It's not a matter of separating time and date into two fields, it is a
      > matter of capturing them at the same time. Currently time is captured
      > when the report is sent (message 2 or message 3 is generated) whilst
      > date is captured when the QSO is completed (the "Log QSO" button is
      > clicked). Since the two events differ by *at least* 2 or 3 minutes,
      > any QSO that crosses "midnight" will record the wrong date in
      > wsjtx_log.adi.

      Sorry Joe, I can't agree with you there. Separating date and time into two fields is exactly why were are where we are with this issue.

      A stand-alone date field belongs in a train or bus timetable, not as an absolute time-stamp in a log record. I don't know if the issue lies with an ambiguous ADIF specification or with a defect in the WSJT-X code, but either way if some way of combining the date and time in a single field had been used we probably wouldn't be having this discussion.

      > 73,
      > ... Joe, W4TV

    • Show all 6 messages in this topic