Re: [sowpods] choosing the WSC participants
- View Source* Ikawa Joseph Victor (ikawaj@...) [050711 00:53]:
> Why are mediocre players pooled with champions?Certainly an issue WESPA (if it lives) can, and ought to, take up.
Several players (myself included) agree that the variability of talent
at the WSC is too large right now. The main obstacle to reducing this
variability is the fact that the world is very big and that,
consequently, it's rather expensive to get players from faraway places
together for meaningful face-to-face "qualifier" games.
> There should be regional slots for qualification to the WSC one wouldAn interesting suggestion.
> suggest and if Thailand will dominate the whole of the Asian team - so
> be it.
However, "Asian qualifier events" are quite impractical for much the
same reason: Asia is very big.
-AC from USA
(not on WSC'05 team)
- View SourceFrom: "Ikawa Joseph Victor" <ikawaj@...>
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:52 AM
> The current WSC has a very poor selection process as several countrieslike Nigeria and Thailand with superb Scrabbling ability have only limited
slots against certain countries which have questionable levels of Scrabble.
Indeed after the last WSC someone stated that one of the contestants had
such bad spread" the worst spread I have seen in my life" he said. If one
observes the performance by the country of origin for that participant over
time it is truly wanting in quality.
I'd like to set the record straight on that one. The country concerned could
not find one of its top players who was willing to go to the WSC in KL. I
believe the low rated player who did eventually represent that country was
the only person interested in going. It's not that player's fault that there
are country allocations and it is therefore a little unfair to criticise
their performance. Everyone present who knew the facts of the situation
expected the player in question to finish last - including that player.