Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [wpmac] Re: WordPerfect for DOS on Mac OS X

Expand Messages
  • John Kaufmann
    Amen, John. In that brief memory you have encapsulated why WP 5.1/DOS (or the equivalent AOS or Unix versions) remains a classic after 20 years: Opening to a
    Message 1 of 37 , Nov 2, 2010
      Amen, John. In that brief memory you have encapsulated why WP 5.1/DOS
      (or the equivalent AOS or Unix versions) remains a classic after 20
      years: Opening to a blank screen, completely without distractions, you
      can focus on the content (as we do in email), without thinking about the
      formatting - while still being able to format as needed, when needed,
      without limitation. As David McCullough has put it, "To write is to
      think; to write clearly is to think clearly." And as was said of WP
      5.1/DOS: "On a clear screen you can see forever." An aesthetic writing
      experience that users at first found either intimidating or liberating,
      if yours was the latter reaction you probably never lost your love for it.

      That said, (though I now mostly use OpenOffice for work) you have made
      WP/Mac my favorite GUI word processor. But thanks for the evocative
      reminder of why I so much enjoy going back to WP 5.1.

      John K.

      In a message dated 2010.11.03 00:53 -0500, jrethorst wrote:

      > Takes me back . . . I cut my word processing teeth on MacWrite v. 1, and was then quite pleased to discover MS Word 1.0. Footnotes! No clunky ruler in the middle of the page every time you changed formatting. Little did any of us suspect what was headed our way with Word 3.0, which Macworld magazine (remember magazines?) called the buggiest piece of software of all time. Then, to teach a computer skills class, I learned DOS and WP 5.1. My goodness. Professional-caliber word processing with a down-home intuitiveness that inspired comfort and articulation.
      > In the 1990s someone at I think the U. of Delaware studied undergraduate writing on word processors, finding that wp/dos users wrote much better than Mac users. Interpretation was that wp/dos users paid attention to what they wrote, while Mac users were too busy deciding which font etc. GUI was more of a new toy then, of course.
      > I’m tempted to install Ed’s setup on my Mac just for the nostalgia.
      > John R.
      > --- In wordperfectmac@yahoogroups.com, "em315"<em315@...> wrote:
      >> A few visitors to this site have asked about ways to edit WordPerfect for DOS files on a Mac. So I've put together a system that uses the DOSBox emulator to run WordPerfect for DOS 5.1 or 6.2. The system prints to the default OS X printer and creates PDF file.
      >> Because this isn't a WordPerfect Mac topic, I've posted fuller details and a download link in the WPDOS forum at WPUniverse.com:
      > ------------------------------------
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
    • Joseph Bush
      Thanks for clarifying! ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Message 37 of 37 , Dec 16, 2010
        Thanks for clarifying!

        On Dec 16, 2010, at 4:24 AM, em315 wrote:

        > No, because DOSBox only has basic support for the Hercules Graphics
        > Card (for graphic screens) but not for the Ramfont feature on the
        > Hercules Graphics Card Plus. (Ramfont supported italic,
        > strikethrough, small and large sizes, etc., in the text screen, but
        > not proportional fonts; proportional fonts were displayed only in
        > print preview. I still have my old card, but no computer to use it
        > in.)
        > If you want italics on a WPDOS text screen, you can choose the
        > Italic font (but you'll lose bold) in Colors/etc. under Settings/
        > Display. Or you can run WPDOS under Windows with Tame, as described
        > here:
        > http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/wpdos/tamewp.html

        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.