Re: [wpmac] WP/Mac on Intel-based Macs
- Yeah, I had heard that there would be no classic environment on the
new ones, so I purposely bought one of the last PPC minis when the
intel minis came out. I''m sure glad I did! But I'm confident that
there will be some kind of package available from someone in the near
future (that's less complicated to set up than Basilisk). Meanwhile,
I'm glad WP runs so well on my mini in classic mode--actually, a
little better than it did on my iMac running OS 9.2.
On May 9, 2006, at 7:26 AM, samanthalynn001 wrote:
> <snip>.......and now that I've got one of the last PPC Minis I'm
> looking towards
> *his* eventual successor having to be Intel someday).
It's confusing, but not as bad in practice:
1) If you want to use it in a Classic Application, it has to be in
System Folder| Fonts. Equally, it has to be a Mac Font. In OSX,
Windows fonts work, too.
2) Don't do anything with the folder System| Library| Fonts. Leave it alone.
3) If you are the only user of your Mac, whether you use Library|
Fonts or ~| Library| Fonts is irrelevant. If you share it, fonts in
your Home Folder Library are only available to you.
4) In practice, WP has a very limited set of fonts while I have over
400 available under OSX applications spread around all four font
>--- In email@example.com, "Don V. Zahniser" <irntooth@...> wrote:
>> See <http://www.lowendmac.com/musings/06/0509.html>
>> for a potential problem relating to duplicate fonts.
>There are fonts all over the place on my machine. The
>standard OSX install has put them in four places:
>Library/Fonts (108 files)
>System (Mac OS 9)/Library/Fonts (17)
>System Folder/Fonts (54, some of which I added)
>The last is what we know as the classic System Folder.
>Fonts in the newer dfont file format are OSX-only I think,
>but otherwise I wonder why there are so many font folders,
>which takes priority when there are duplicates, and which
>folder you should add fonts to. The lowendmac.com article
>describes finding and disabling a duplicate but doesn't go
>further than that.
>Yahoo! Groups Links