5641Re: [wpmac] SpamSieve vs. legitimate WordPerfect posts?
- Feb 7, 2009I agree that SpamSieve is a terrific product, and very well
supported. I've been using it for about 2 years now; I've probably
gotten about a dozen updates to it without paying any additional
fees. It does a far better job than any other spam filter I've tried,
and is very reasonably priced, especially given the outstanding support.
On Feb 6, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Katherine Noftz Nagel (Kat) wrote:
> BI've been using SpamSieve for several years. It's the best of the
> bunch, in my experience, in terms of the low incidence of false
> positives (mail marked as spam that shouldn't be). If you're
> concerned, just go back into training mode for a while: mark the
> real spam messages, then screen your spam folder for any real list
> messages that might have gotten caught. I sort by subject, then
> scroll down to [wpmac] to check for mistakes. After a few
> corrections, SpamSieve has been dead accurate in separating real
> messages from junk.
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>