RE: [webloggerusergroup] Group Name (was Re: Bay Area Weblogger Group: What's Next?)
- I think OPEN describes the club well and it's very slick. But, when
coming up with a name for the organization, we should be prepared for
people who will search for that name on google. OPEN isn't going to
work as well as "Bay Area Weblogger Group" in that sense.
From: markkraft@... [mailto:markkraft@...]
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 8:51 AM
Subject: [webloggerusergroup] Group Name (was Re: Bay Area Weblogger
Group: What's Next?)
Glad you thought the ideas were of use, although I don't think you
entirely got my first point.
Yes, peapod is a flop-com. That is a valid point. However, what I
wanted to get away from, especially for those who come at this from a
journal or diary perspective, is using the term weblog. I don't think
it is inclusive enough. It is a term that will turn some LiveJournal
users off, assuming they even know what a weblog is in the first
place, which, of course, most people don't.
Fortunately, I just thought of a better name that I would favor over
P-Pod any day of the week...
How about "Online Publishing Enthusiasts Network" or OPEN. It not
only spreads the net wide, it also has a very friendly acronym that
really, to me, conveys exactly what this group is all about.
--- In webloggerusergroup@y..., "Diane" <dereese@m...> wrote:
> --- In webloggerusergroup@y..., markkraft@y... wrote:
> > Many comments:
> And many with which I agree, btw...
> > 1> Group name. It should be as vendor-neutral and as inclusive as
> > reasonably possible.
> Excellent idea.
> > After thinking about names, I have a favorite to suggest that I
> > think would be catchy, inclusive, and allow us to go from general
> > to specific rather than predefining ourselves too specifically
> > wishing it were easier to backtrack later.
> I'm with you so far...
> > I think we should call our user groups Peapods (P-POD), an
> > for Personal Publishers Offline Discussion.
> Eeeeek! No, please. Peapod was an online grocery delivery service
> which competed with Webvan (before its demise) in many areas and is
> now in abbreviated operation on the east coast between CT and VA.
> While I was one of the few people who tried single-handedly to keep
> Webvan in business, I can't imagine naming our group after a
> delivery service (even inadvertently).
> For the reasons Mark mentioned above, I rather liked the Weblog
> Interest Group suggestion made at the meeting. We can have wigs
> rather than pods, eh?
> > 2> Meeting location. I don't think moving the meeting location
> > around the bay is a good idea if you want to encourage
> Your points are all valid on this one. Here's one perspective:
> I got a lot of energy out of this week's IRL meeting and plan to
> continue to attend, I have two school-aged kids at home and a
> who travels a lot. There ain't no way in creation I can finish my
> workday, pick up the kids, feed them, start them on homework, and
> then get on a train to SF on a weeknight with the ability to return
> home in time to get them in bed before 11 (!). It just ain't never
> gonna happen: I can't EVER go to SF on a weeknight, for ANYthing.
> Now, situationally-single parents with school-aged kids might not
> the audience this meeting is targeting (see Mark's comment on
> Nielsen), in which case, I defer, and will only come on alternate
> months, since I recognize that others have different yet just as
> valid constraints on their time and travel. The alternate-months
> thing just isn't the same as being a regular member, and is likely
> serve to fragment the group.
> > I would suggest
> > a place near the train and near the San Mateo Bridge.(Hayward
> > Hillsdale, etc.)
> If this suggestion works for people with needs different from mine,
> I'm all in favor of it. If not, maybe instead of SIGs based on
> interest, we need to admit that a single Bay Area group might not
> Thanks for the thoughts, Mark, they're good ones. (I also agree
> your meeting structure points, but why bother with *too* much "me
> Diane Reese
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
- On another forum, Julian Bond posted a link to an experiment by Cory
Doctorow (http://www.craphound.com/fourblogs/). That gave me an idea. With
less than five minutes of work, I threw together a sample (but very much
live) page that displays four weblogs from their RSS feeds using canned
blogger as columnist.