Re: EU Cookie Directive & Effect on Ad Revenues
- Hi all,
I just want to mention that the term "cookie law" or "cookie directive" is
misleading. Yes, cookies are the most common technology for identifying a
visitor, but in fact the directive is about privacy. It does not matter
which technology is used. What is required is getting user consent
regardless of the tracking method (cookie, IP, login, device ID,
fingerprint, ... ...).
Also, I do not think it is helpful to draw a picture where the authorities
might become "cookie nazis", as ourself could quickly be named "tracking
nazis" in return.. I'd rather have a more constructive discussion. (don't
get me wrong Steve, I understood this was only a description and in
quotation marks, not meant as an insult, but imho we should be a little
more careful here)
The intention of the privacy regulation is not senseless. It does not help
us to blame authorities for a lack of technical understanding.
In other words (now I am drawing a picture..): One does not need to know
how a motor is constructed when requiring a speed limit in front of a
Instead we have to explain our profession, our methods, and the reason for
tracking and targeting. All this must be made transparent and controllable
for an end-user. This is certainly challenging, but our industry has
probably not made the very best job in terms of transparency so far. The EU
directive is just a logical consequence of this. Now, it's on us to find
solutions, as well as educating about what we do in an honest and
I am confident that neither the online business will die, nor that we
cannot use and track any data any more. But we need to do some homework..
Vice President Analytics, Europe
Semphonic - Office Berlin
Mobile: +49 173 2008758
> 3b. Re: EU Cookie Directive & Effect on Ad Revenues[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/webanalytics/message/29313;_ylc=X3oDMTJzMnJxMWJyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE1BGdycElkAzEyOTc5MTQxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTAwNTU4MgRtc2dJZAMyOTMxMwRzZWMDZG1zZwRzbGsDdm1zZwRzdGltZQMxMzM4NDgxNTU1> Posted
> by: "ju2ltd" jim@...
> <jim@...?Subject=+Re%3A%20EU%20Cookie%20Directive%20%26%20Effect%20on%20Ad%20Revenues> ju2ltd
> <http://profiles.yahoo.com/ju2ltd> Thu May 31, 2012 3:38 am (PDT)
> Steve - so if a site were to become compliant and a significant number of
> their users opt out of 3rd party cookies will they loose ad revenue?
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Steve Bashiri" <stevebash@...>
> > Will Ad revenue be effected? Yes. Will the EU eCommerce revenue be
> > effected? Yes, in the short term. Will most EU web sites follow this
> > directive to the tee? No. Many governments know how difficult it is to
> > enforce this, and are already back-pedaling on the language of the law.
> > According to Business Insider, the British government has amended its
> > version of the directive to include that it is ok for web sites to obtain
> > user's "implied consent" to be cookied. Lets face it, it's the use of
> > cookie to obtain user behavior and retarget them, that is really the
> > behind all this fuss. And using cookies to accomplish that is not in
> > anytime soon. Even if it was, let's say in EU, and they came hard on all
> > on-line businesses and they turned into cookie Nazis that we all hope
> > won't become, there are other means of tracking user behavior and
> > them. The fact is governments are not as agile as tech businesses, they
> > just don't move fast enough to keep up with the pace of innovation.
> > Business will find it's cheese, no matter where you hide it.
> > Having said all that, the online marketing and Ad industry must take
> > responsibility and proper measures to keep its practices fair to the user
> > community and each other. This self-policing must be organic and come
> > within, or, eventually some regulatory body will impose restrictions on
> > their business. And the next time they may have the consent of the
> > majority.
> > Steve Bashiri